%0 Journal Article %T Factual Causation in International Investment Arbitration: Functions and Criteria %J Public Law Studies Quarterly %I University of Tehran %Z 2423-8120 %A Sobhi, Hossein %A Amini, Mansour %A Abedian, Mir Hossein %D 2023 %\ 03/21/2023 %V 53 %N 1 %P 139-161 %! Factual Causation in International Investment Arbitration: Functions and Criteria %K bad business judgment %K concurrent causation %K factual causation %K general economic situation of the host state %K human intervention factor %K third party act %R 10.22059/jplsq.2021.320398.2720 %X The causal link is of great importance in international investment disputes, as it acts as an intermediary between the liability of the host state and the evaluation of damages. This paper, seeks to identify the factors that can be considered as the sole cause of the investor's loss despite the commission of a wrongful act by the host state, and, on the other hand, seeks to identify an accurate test for establishing the causal link in case of concurrent causation. Concerning factors affecting causation, the paper concludes that the incorrect business decisions of the investor, the general economic situation of the host state, and bona fide third parties can be regarded as factors that can break the causal link between the wrongful act and loss. Regarding the criteria for establishing factual causation, considering the possibility of human intervention betwixt the breach of the investment treaty and investor's loss, it is recommended that in case of concurrent causation, arbitral tribunals employ the NESS test instead of the but-for test, since the former can better help the tribunals in determining the factual causes of harm. %U https://jplsq.ut.ac.ir/article_87315_568d62221cc46ad2284827437e005a35.pdf