TY - JOUR ID - 88537 TI - The preliminary objection concerning "Third Country Measures" in the Judgment of the International Court of Justice in the Jurisdiction, 2021 JO - Public Law Studies Quarterly JA - JPLSQ LA - en SN - 2423-8120 AU - Mousavi Mirkalayee, Sayed Taha AU - Mohamadzadeh, Savalan AD - Former Assistant Prof., Department of Public Law and International Law, Faculty of Judicial Law, University of Judicial Sciences and Administrative Services, Tehran, Iran AD - MA. in (International Law), Faculty of Judicial Law, University of Judicial Sciences and Administrative Services, Tehran, Iran Y1 - 2023 PY - 2023 VL - IS - SP - 1 EP - 20 KW - Third Country Measures KW - USA KW - Iran KW - International Court of Justice(ICJ) KW - Judgment on the Jurisdiction DO - 10.22059/jplsq.2021.329735.2872 N2 - Following the sanctions by the US, on July 16 2018 Iran filed in the ICJ an application instituting proceedings against the US pursuant to Article 21(2)of the Treaty of Amity. The proceeding led to the issuance of a Judgment February 3 2021 and declaring jurisdiction of the court to settle the dispute. During the proceedings, the US as a defendant, challenged the court's jurisdiction and raised some preliminary objections, including "Third Country Measures". The main question is how was reflected in the Judgment of the ICJ, February 3 2021, the "Third Country Measures" as one of the defendant’s preliminary objections? The paper concludes descriptively-analytically that inferred from the Court's Judgment, in order to examine the violation of the Treaty of Amity, it is important to determine the jurisdiction based on the US action about sanctions, not on the manner of implementation that could be the US or any other state. UR - https://jplsq.ut.ac.ir/article_88537.html L1 - https://jplsq.ut.ac.ir/article_88537_75fcfa002e12aac4baa81be45cbd31ec.pdf ER -