<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Faculty of Law and Political Science</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Public Law Studies Quarterly</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2423-8120</Issn>
				<Volume>50</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2020</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>21</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Protection of the Children&#039;s Rights within the Framework of the United Nations Peacebuilding Commission</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Protection of the Children&#039;s Rights within the Framework of the United Nations Peacebuilding Commission</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>1287</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>1306</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">77175</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22059/jplsq.2019.272257.1890</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Zohreh</FirstName>
					<LastName>Shafiee</LastName>
<Affiliation>MA. in International Law,, Department of Public and International Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran, Iran</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0003-4712-5655</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Pouria</FirstName>
					<LastName>Askary</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Prof., Department of Public and International Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Allameh Tabataba&amp;#039;i University, Tehran, Iran</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0002-7054-3049</Identifier>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2018</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>25</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>The importance of respecting children&#039;s rights in peace-building processes to achieve a sustainable peace raises the question of whether the UN Peacebuilding Commission, as the responsible organ for peace-building affairs of the UN, has taken into account children&#039; rights and the key role of this issue in the realization of peace? The purpose of this study is to clarify the need to pay more attention to children&#039;s rights in peace-building processes. The article has dealt with the presentation of a reasonable relationship between these two variables by utilizing previous studies and several United Nations reports and has analyzed the reports to investigate the commission performance. The data analysis indicates the attention of commission to some of the children’s rights. Of course, this attention is not due to considering the violation of children&#039;s rights as one of the causes of conflict, but because of the widespread effects of the conflict on them.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">The importance of respecting children&#039;s rights in peace-building processes to achieve a sustainable peace raises the question of whether the UN Peacebuilding Commission, as the responsible organ for peace-building affairs of the UN, has taken into account children&#039; rights and the key role of this issue in the realization of peace? The purpose of this study is to clarify the need to pay more attention to children&#039;s rights in peace-building processes. The article has dealt with the presentation of a reasonable relationship between these two variables by utilizing previous studies and several United Nations reports and has analyzed the reports to investigate the commission performance. The data analysis indicates the attention of commission to some of the children’s rights. Of course, this attention is not due to considering the violation of children&#039;s rights as one of the causes of conflict, but because of the widespread effects of the conflict on them.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Children's rights</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Sustainable Peace</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Peace-Building</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Peacebuilding Commission</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Faculty of Law and Political Science</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Public Law Studies Quarterly</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2423-8120</Issn>
				<Volume>50</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2020</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>27</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Legal Requirements of the Resistive Economy in the &quot;Legislative Phase&quot; with the emphasis on Principle 44 of the Constitution</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Legal Requirements of the Resistive Economy in the &quot;Legislative Phase&quot; with the emphasis on Principle 44 of the Constitution</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>1307</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>1329</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">76188</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22059/jplsq.2019.269081.1852</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Kiamrs</FirstName>
					<LastName>Jahangir</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Prof., Faculty of Law and Political Science,  University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000000314212592</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Vali</FirstName>
					<LastName>Rostami</LastName>
<Affiliation>Associate Prof., Faculty of Law and Political Science,  University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Bahaddin</FirstName>
					<LastName>Tari</LastName>
<Affiliation>Ph.D. Student in Public Law,  ,University of Twhran Aras International Campus</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2018</Year>
					<Month>11</Month>
					<Day>29</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>The resistive economy has been noticed as a fundamental strategy to change the economy movement of the country by the Supreme Leader of the Revolution. Imposing unlawful unilateral sanctions in order to put pressure on the Islamic Revolution which has imposed restrictions on the country&#039;s economic development, on the one hand, and the necessity to integrate and relationship between the general policies of the resistive economy and the specialized areas of public law in order to achieve social and economic growth and justice, welfare and dynamism based on production and employment on the other hand, clarify the necessity of investigating the legal requirements of the resistive economy. The research question is that what are the legal requirements of the legislative phase of resistive economy? In answer to this question, the research findings, which have been done in a descriptive-analytical manner, indicate that the legal requirements of the resistive economy in the legislative phase are the adoption of effective, transparent, coherent and revised laws that make the necessary efficiency in order to enable the creation of public relations between the authorities and the public as a key solution for the implementation of a resistive economy and legal requirements.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">The resistive economy has been noticed as a fundamental strategy to change the economy movement of the country by the Supreme Leader of the Revolution. Imposing unlawful unilateral sanctions in order to put pressure on the Islamic Revolution which has imposed restrictions on the country&#039;s economic development, on the one hand, and the necessity to integrate and relationship between the general policies of the resistive economy and the specialized areas of public law in order to achieve social and economic growth and justice, welfare and dynamism based on production and employment on the other hand, clarify the necessity of investigating the legal requirements of the resistive economy. The research question is that what are the legal requirements of the legislative phase of resistive economy? In answer to this question, the research findings, which have been done in a descriptive-analytical manner, indicate that the legal requirements of the resistive economy in the legislative phase are the adoption of effective, transparent, coherent and revised laws that make the necessary efficiency in order to enable the creation of public relations between the authorities and the public as a key solution for the implementation of a resistive economy and legal requirements.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">legal requirements</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">resistive economy</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">general policies</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Legislation</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Constitution</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Faculty of Law and Political Science</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Public Law Studies Quarterly</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2423-8120</Issn>
				<Volume>50</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2020</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>21</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Transboundary Environmental Impact Assessment in International Environmental Law</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Transboundary Environmental Impact Assessment in International Environmental Law</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>1331</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>1355</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">76859</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22059/jplsq.2020.299162.2355</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Asma</FirstName>
					<LastName>Salari</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Prof., Department of Law, Zabol University, Zabol, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2020</Year>
					<Month>03</Month>
					<Day>08</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Environmental impact assessment is an obligation belongs to international environmental law sphere in order to protect the environment which asks States to determine the likely impacts of a proposed activity or project on the environment of another country or countries. The International Court of Justice has introduced it as a requirement under general international law in Pulp Mills case and San Juan case pursuant to ITLOS’s explicit recognition of customary status of the EIA. Jurists have different opinions on the EIA, like; the way of becoming a customary rule and especially on the content of it. Based on the descriptive-analytical methodology with the help of library sources, the present article tried to deduce the process of consolidation, customary status and content of this obligation through international judgments/awards and documents and concluded that this customary obligation establishes when there is a risk of significant adverse transboundary impact. If there is such a risk, assessment is done. So, there are three stages; the preliminary assessment measuring the possibility of transboundary harm, conducting the assessment and the post-project assessment that provides valuable information for similar subsequent activities and the validity of assessments.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Environmental impact assessment is an obligation belongs to international environmental law sphere in order to protect the environment which asks States to determine the likely impacts of a proposed activity or project on the environment of another country or countries. The International Court of Justice has introduced it as a requirement under general international law in Pulp Mills case and San Juan case pursuant to ITLOS’s explicit recognition of customary status of the EIA. Jurists have different opinions on the EIA, like; the way of becoming a customary rule and especially on the content of it. Based on the descriptive-analytical methodology with the help of library sources, the present article tried to deduce the process of consolidation, customary status and content of this obligation through international judgments/awards and documents and concluded that this customary obligation establishes when there is a risk of significant adverse transboundary impact. If there is such a risk, assessment is done. So, there are three stages; the preliminary assessment measuring the possibility of transboundary harm, conducting the assessment and the post-project assessment that provides valuable information for similar subsequent activities and the validity of assessments.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Transboundary Environmental impact assessment</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">international environmental law</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">International Court of Justice</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Customary Rule</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Espoo Convention</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Faculty of Law and Political Science</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Public Law Studies Quarterly</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2423-8120</Issn>
				<Volume>50</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2020</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>21</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Analysis of the Scope of the Right to Demand for Real Estate Prices Located at Municipal Development Projects after Optional Implementation of Correctional Edge by the Owners</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Analysis of the Scope of the Right to Demand for Real Estate Prices Located at Municipal Development Projects after Optional Implementation of Correctional Edge by the Owners</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>1357</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>1377</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">77605</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22059/jplsq.2019.269220.1855</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Seyed Mohammad Sadegh</FirstName>
					<LastName>Tabatabaei</LastName>
<Affiliation>Associate Professor of Law, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Manouchehr</FirstName>
					<LastName>Tavassoli Naeini</LastName>
<Affiliation>Associate Professor of Law Department, Faculty of Administrative and Economic Sciences, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Seyed Yaser</FirstName>
					<LastName>Hoseini</LastName>
<Affiliation>Ph.D student in Isfahan University of Law, Isfahan University, Isfahan, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2018</Year>
					<Month>11</Month>
					<Day>09</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Implementation of development plans, where requires the possession of the citizens&#039; lands, sometimes encountered property owners resistance and lack of compliance with these plans that ultimately ends with the compulsion of the competent authorities and the intervention of the executed agents with duress. But sometimes owners take action on the implementation of the plan and optional retreat with discretion and willingly. In this case, the right to claim for value by him has sometimes been questioned and denied by lawyers and courts. Judicial review also shows that most of them are deprived of claim for value and proof their rights and the municipalities have taken over part of their property for free. The present study seeks to examine the reasoning grounds of this category of courts and lawyers to argue on proving the right of this category of owners.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Implementation of development plans, where requires the possession of the citizens&#039; lands, sometimes encountered property owners resistance and lack of compliance with these plans that ultimately ends with the compulsion of the competent authorities and the intervention of the executed agents with duress. But sometimes owners take action on the implementation of the plan and optional retreat with discretion and willingly. In this case, the right to claim for value by him has sometimes been questioned and denied by lawyers and courts. Judicial review also shows that most of them are deprived of claim for value and proof their rights and the municipalities have taken over part of their property for free. The present study seeks to examine the reasoning grounds of this category of courts and lawyers to argue on proving the right of this category of owners.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Correctional edge</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">possession</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Right to Claim for Value</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Municipality</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Optional retreat</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Faculty of Law and Political Science</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Public Law Studies Quarterly</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2423-8120</Issn>
				<Volume>50</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2020</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>States&#039; Obligations to Create Gender Equality in Education</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>States&#039; Obligations to Create Gender Equality in Education</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>1401</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>1421</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">77597</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22059/jplsq.2019.281639.2013</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Maryam</FirstName>
					<LastName>Seyed Hatami</LastName>
<Affiliation>Ph.D. in Public International Law, Department  of  Public &amp; International  Law,  College  of Law  and  Political  Science,  Science  and  Research  Branch,  Islamic  Azad  University,  Tehran,  Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Nasrin</FirstName>
					<LastName>Mosaffa</LastName>
<Affiliation>Prof., Department of International Relations, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2019</Year>
					<Month>05</Month>
					<Day>19</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>The right to education is one of the fundamental human rights that all persons should enjoy without discrimination. This right has been emphasized in various human rights documents. Thus, gender inequality in education is explicit breach of this right. The present paper, seek to relevant human rights frameworks consisted of international treaties, reports of human rights bodies and States practices, concludes that the nature of the commitment to educational equality is de juré, that breach of this will create international responsibility for countries. These obligations do not have a negative nature, but rather direct and regulate the behavior of States in balance with their positive nature. In fact, these commitments not only overcome the barriers women face in exercising this right, but also provide the grounds for their realization and while identifying the problem of gender inequality, fights it. In all legislative and executive fields, countries committed on the creation of defined frameworks for the elimination of discrimination and guarantee the women&#039;s rights in education.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">The right to education is one of the fundamental human rights that all persons should enjoy without discrimination. This right has been emphasized in various human rights documents. Thus, gender inequality in education is explicit breach of this right. The present paper, seek to relevant human rights frameworks consisted of international treaties, reports of human rights bodies and States practices, concludes that the nature of the commitment to educational equality is de juré, that breach of this will create international responsibility for countries. These obligations do not have a negative nature, but rather direct and regulate the behavior of States in balance with their positive nature. In fact, these commitments not only overcome the barriers women face in exercising this right, but also provide the grounds for their realization and while identifying the problem of gender inequality, fights it. In all legislative and executive fields, countries committed on the creation of defined frameworks for the elimination of discrimination and guarantee the women&#039;s rights in education.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">gender equality</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Gender discrimination</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">State Obligations</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">right to education</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Sustainable Development Goals</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Faculty of Law and Political Science</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Public Law Studies Quarterly</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2423-8120</Issn>
				<Volume>50</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2020</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>21</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>From Geneva to San Remo; Developments of Humanitarian Law on Armed Conflicts at Sea</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>From Geneva to San Remo; Developments of Humanitarian Law on Armed Conflicts at Sea</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>1379</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>1399</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">77601</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22059/jplsq.2019.274813.1915</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Seyed Ali</FirstName>
					<LastName>Hosseiniazad</LastName>
<Affiliation>Ph.D. Student in International Law,, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Allameh Tabatabaei University, Tehran, Iran</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0002-9154-1536</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mahshid</FirstName>
					<LastName>Ajeli Lahiji</LastName>
<Affiliation>Ph.D. Student in International Law,, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Allameh Tabatabaei University, Tehran, Iran</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0001-9238-810X</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Majid</FirstName>
					<LastName>Zahmatkesh</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2019</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>27</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Humanitarian laws applicable to the marine armed conflicts have not been faced with any development after 12 August 1949 through the conventional norms unlike land armed conflicts. However, some parts of the First Protocol, inter alia, the whole of its fourth part apply to the marine armed conflicts. Developments and progresses had been emerged in the context of modern technology and naval warfare have shown that the law of armed conflicts at sea need development and codification, because most of its instruments were created in the 20th century and were almost old. Through analyzing the customary norms, and some aspects of international soft law, specially The San Remo Manual, can be found that despite the absence of new conventional norms in this context, but the humanitarian law applicable on the armed conflicts at sea has had a sort of developments that most of them are about precautions in attacks, concept of the military objectives, military activities in different areas of the Sea, aircrafts and protection of marine environments.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Humanitarian laws applicable to the marine armed conflicts have not been faced with any development after 12 August 1949 through the conventional norms unlike land armed conflicts. However, some parts of the First Protocol, inter alia, the whole of its fourth part apply to the marine armed conflicts. Developments and progresses had been emerged in the context of modern technology and naval warfare have shown that the law of armed conflicts at sea need development and codification, because most of its instruments were created in the 20th century and were almost old. Through analyzing the customary norms, and some aspects of international soft law, specially The San Remo Manual, can be found that despite the absence of new conventional norms in this context, but the humanitarian law applicable on the armed conflicts at sea has had a sort of developments that most of them are about precautions in attacks, concept of the military objectives, military activities in different areas of the Sea, aircrafts and protection of marine environments.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">The San Remo Manual</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Development and Codification</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Naval Warfare</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Humanitarian law</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Armed conflicts</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Faculty of Law and Political Science</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Public Law Studies Quarterly</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2423-8120</Issn>
				<Volume>50</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2020</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>21</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Obstacles and Challenges in Applying Civil Liability of Government in Iran</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Obstacles and Challenges in Applying Civil Liability of Government in Iran</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>1423</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>1440</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">77173</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22059/jplsq.2019.266420.1829</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Ayat</FirstName>
					<LastName>Mulaee</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Prof., Department of Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2018</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>29</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>The theory of civil liability of government is from the generators of democracy in the modern age which was raised in the nineteenth and twentieth century, many countries were accepted. In the paper, it has been analyzed the obstacles and challenges to the legal institution of government civil liability in the context of note 1 of article 10 of the Act on the Establishment and Procedure of the Administrative Justice Court, by using descriptive-analytical method. Briefly, the conclusion is that the main challenge is at three levels: &quot;theoretical belief in the system of the Judiciary&quot;, &quot;legal acts&quot; and &quot;the weakness of the doctrine of public law in Iran about the government civil liability as a legal institution&quot;. As a result, citizens have to go to general courts to determine the amount of damages. This situation is a clear indication of the failure of the idea of ​​civil liability of government.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">The theory of civil liability of government is from the generators of democracy in the modern age which was raised in the nineteenth and twentieth century, many countries were accepted. In the paper, it has been analyzed the obstacles and challenges to the legal institution of government civil liability in the context of note 1 of article 10 of the Act on the Establishment and Procedure of the Administrative Justice Court, by using descriptive-analytical method. Briefly, the conclusion is that the main challenge is at three levels: &quot;theoretical belief in the system of the Judiciary&quot;, &quot;legal acts&quot; and &quot;the weakness of the doctrine of public law in Iran about the government civil liability as a legal institution&quot;. As a result, citizens have to go to general courts to determine the amount of damages. This situation is a clear indication of the failure of the idea of ​​civil liability of government.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Privatization in the Judiciary</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">damage</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Public Law Doctrine</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Article 10 of the Act on the Establishment and Procedure of the Administrative Justice Court</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Civil Liability of Government</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Faculty of Law and Political Science</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Public Law Studies Quarterly</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2423-8120</Issn>
				<Volume>50</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2020</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>The Concept of International Solidarity and its Impact on the Structure of Modern International Law</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>The Concept of International Solidarity and its Impact on the Structure of Modern International Law</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>1441</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>1461</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">77595</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22059/jplsq.2019.276075.1928</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Abdollah</FirstName>
					<LastName>Razzaghy</LastName>
<Affiliation>Ph.D. Candidate in International Law, University of Tehran, Kish International Campus, Kish, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Farideh</FirstName>
					<LastName>Shaygan</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Prof.,Law Department of University of Tehran, Kish International Campus, Kish, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2019</Year>
					<Month>02</Month>
					<Day>14</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>The evolution of international law led to the transition from coexistence to cooperation among independent States, but since the second half of the 20th century, a new concept emerged in some international law documents which regard international community and international law from different angle, focusing on priority of common interests and values. The study of legal rules and new international documents reflect their impact by the principle of international solidarity, such that it may be contended that the modern international law is passing through the State-centered stage to another arena, viewing the international community as a whole. The limitation of the States sovereignty in favor of the interests of the international community as a whole, including all human beings, due to the principle of solidarity, can ultimately lead to a structural transformation in the international legal system in order to prioritize the interests and values of the international community and make it objective reality.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">The evolution of international law led to the transition from coexistence to cooperation among independent States, but since the second half of the 20th century, a new concept emerged in some international law documents which regard international community and international law from different angle, focusing on priority of common interests and values. The study of legal rules and new international documents reflect their impact by the principle of international solidarity, such that it may be contended that the modern international law is passing through the State-centered stage to another arena, viewing the international community as a whole. The limitation of the States sovereignty in favor of the interests of the international community as a whole, including all human beings, due to the principle of solidarity, can ultimately lead to a structural transformation in the international legal system in order to prioritize the interests and values of the international community and make it objective reality.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Modern International Law</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Hierarchical Structure of International Law</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">International Solidarity</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Integrity of International Law</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Faculty of Law and Political Science</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Public Law Studies Quarterly</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2423-8120</Issn>
				<Volume>50</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2020</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution as an Example of Unwritten Article of Constitution</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution as an Example of Unwritten Article of Constitution</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>1463</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>1485</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">77573</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22059/jplsq.2019.256361.1724</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Seyed Naser</FirstName>
					<LastName>Soltani</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Prof., Department of Public Law, College of Farabi, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2018</Year>
					<Month>04</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>After the process of codification of the Constitution, with all its complexities of review, a number of unwritten procedures and rules are formed around each principle of the Constitution or even separately which are occasionally appeared as the conditions and bounds for the principle of the Constitution. Such rules are sometimes so prominent and superior that are able to alter the competence of the public authorities. Representing a true, precise image of constitutional system would not be possible without explaining such rules. Therefore, a methodological drawback can be indicated in the current description of the Constitution. Moreover, considering this issue is important in the sense that it can enlighten the more profound layers of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Iran, resulting in a better recognition of this Constitution. In the present study, one of the unwritten principles of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Iran, named Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution, is investigated. The process of formation and development of the council is explored. The condition in which the council was established as well as the story of its setting, despite the challenges, is described.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">After the process of codification of the Constitution, with all its complexities of review, a number of unwritten procedures and rules are formed around each principle of the Constitution or even separately which are occasionally appeared as the conditions and bounds for the principle of the Constitution. Such rules are sometimes so prominent and superior that are able to alter the competence of the public authorities. Representing a true, precise image of constitutional system would not be possible without explaining such rules. Therefore, a methodological drawback can be indicated in the current description of the Constitution. Moreover, considering this issue is important in the sense that it can enlighten the more profound layers of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Iran, resulting in a better recognition of this Constitution. In the present study, one of the unwritten principles of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Iran, named Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution, is investigated. The process of formation and development of the council is explored. The condition in which the council was established as well as the story of its setting, despite the challenges, is described.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Unwritten Articles of Constitution</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">written constitution</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">unwritten constitution</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Faculty of Law and Political Science</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Public Law Studies Quarterly</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2423-8120</Issn>
				<Volume>50</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2020</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>21</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Cyber Espionage in International Law: Attribution of International Responsibility to States in a State of Uncertainty</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Cyber Espionage in International Law: Attribution of International Responsibility to States in a State of Uncertainty</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>1487</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>1503</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">76869</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22059/jplsq.2020.274302.1912</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Aramesh</FirstName>
					<LastName>Shahbazi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Associate Prof, Department of Public and International Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Allame Tabatabaii University, Tehran, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Aida</FirstName>
					<LastName>Aghajani Ronaghi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Ph.D. Student in International Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Allame Tabatabaii University, Tehran, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2019</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>21</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>The rapid advancement of technology and the unique characteristics of cyberspace have caused change in many of international law&#039;s classic concepts, and in most cases, the lack of coherent customary regimes prepared grounds for new interpretation of classic concepts. Cyber espionage is a relatively new concept in international law, and there is no agreement on legal regime governing it. Ambiguity and fear of extending principles and rules governing espionage in traditional sense, to cyberspace, which is generally the domain of soft law practice, has put international law governing this new concept in a state of uncertainty. Therefore, on one hand, the legitimacy of extraterritorial infiltration acts of States through espionage remains controversial, and on the other hand, the use of virtual instruments by States for advancing their extraterritorial infiltration into cyberspace of other States, has fueled ambiguities. The lack of specific international customary and treaty obligations in this regard paves the way for the application of general principles and rules of international law. This article seeks to elucidate the concept and scope of cyber espionage and the international responsibility arising from it, taking into account, State practice and doctrine, to answer this fundamental question that, which principles and rules of international law govern cyber espionage.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">The rapid advancement of technology and the unique characteristics of cyberspace have caused change in many of international law&#039;s classic concepts, and in most cases, the lack of coherent customary regimes prepared grounds for new interpretation of classic concepts. Cyber espionage is a relatively new concept in international law, and there is no agreement on legal regime governing it. Ambiguity and fear of extending principles and rules governing espionage in traditional sense, to cyberspace, which is generally the domain of soft law practice, has put international law governing this new concept in a state of uncertainty. Therefore, on one hand, the legitimacy of extraterritorial infiltration acts of States through espionage remains controversial, and on the other hand, the use of virtual instruments by States for advancing their extraterritorial infiltration into cyberspace of other States, has fueled ambiguities. The lack of specific international customary and treaty obligations in this regard paves the way for the application of general principles and rules of international law. This article seeks to elucidate the concept and scope of cyber espionage and the international responsibility arising from it, taking into account, State practice and doctrine, to answer this fundamental question that, which principles and rules of international law govern cyber espionage.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">International wrongful acts</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">cyber Espionage</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">International Law</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">cyber space</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">International State Responsibility</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Faculty of Law and Political Science</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Public Law Studies Quarterly</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2423-8120</Issn>
				<Volume>50</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2020</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>21</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>The Jurisdiction of the ICJ on Indication of Provisional Measures: An Emphasis on Ukraine v. Russian Federation 2017</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>The Jurisdiction of the ICJ on Indication of Provisional Measures: An Emphasis on Ukraine v. Russian Federation 2017</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>1505</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>1524</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">76874</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22059/jplsq.2019.257288.1733</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Seyed Bagher</FirstName>
					<LastName>Mirabasi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Professor, Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, Department of Public and International Law, University of Tehran,  Tehran, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Amir</FirstName>
					<LastName>Famil Zavvar Jalali</LastName>
<Affiliation>P.h. D Student in International Law, Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2018</Year>
					<Month>05</Month>
					<Day>06</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Lengthening the period between bringing a claim before the ICJ and making the final decision by this entity might cause prejudice to the rights and interests of the claimant. Therefore, pursuant to Article 41 of the ICJ statute, this entity is allowed to indicate, whenever necessary, provisional measures. Considering provisional measures is often being requested by either party at the early stages of proceedings, and based on the fact that the international courts only have jurisdiction on the basis of consent, the issue of indicating provisional measures when the jurisdiction has not yet been established is open to controversy. The circumstances under which the Court decides to indicate provisional measures are also important. In this regard, it is useful to examine the Court’s approach concerning indication of provisional measures in relation to the application of the International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism and the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination in Ukraine v. Russian Federation. The investigation of the law and practice of the Court implies that merely prima facie jurisdiction suffices for the indication of provisional measures, but concerning the conditions required, the Court would apply its own criteria and strictness.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Lengthening the period between bringing a claim before the ICJ and making the final decision by this entity might cause prejudice to the rights and interests of the claimant. Therefore, pursuant to Article 41 of the ICJ statute, this entity is allowed to indicate, whenever necessary, provisional measures. Considering provisional measures is often being requested by either party at the early stages of proceedings, and based on the fact that the international courts only have jurisdiction on the basis of consent, the issue of indicating provisional measures when the jurisdiction has not yet been established is open to controversy. The circumstances under which the Court decides to indicate provisional measures are also important. In this regard, it is useful to examine the Court’s approach concerning indication of provisional measures in relation to the application of the International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism and the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination in Ukraine v. Russian Federation. The investigation of the law and practice of the Court implies that merely prima facie jurisdiction suffices for the indication of provisional measures, but concerning the conditions required, the Court would apply its own criteria and strictness.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Crimea Peninsula</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Prima Facie Jurisdiction</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Provisional Measures</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Faculty of Law and Political Science</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Public Law Studies Quarterly</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2423-8120</Issn>
				<Volume>50</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2020</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>21</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Constitutional Court Control on Transparency of Laws Comparative Study of Iran&#039;s Guardian Council and Federal Constitutional Court of Germany</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Constitutional Court Control on Transparency of Laws Comparative Study of Iran&#039;s Guardian Council and Federal Constitutional Court of Germany</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>1525</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>1544</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">77600</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22059/jplsq.2019.272796.1895</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mohammad Shahab</FirstName>
					<LastName>Jalilvand</LastName>
<Affiliation>Ph.D. In public law, Faculty of Law, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Ali Akbar</FirstName>
					<LastName>Gorji Azandariani</LastName>
<Affiliation>Associate  Professor, Department of Public Law, Faculty of Law, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2018</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>31</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>&quot;Transparency&quot; as one of the qualitative features of the law is one of the important elements in the realization of the legal security of the countries and both the Iran&#039;s Guardian Council and the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany monitor the transparency of the law in various aspects to ensure the realization of quality laws. This article tries to examine and critique and analyze the criteria and method of supervision of the Guardian Council and the Federal Constitutional Court by using a descriptive-analytical method and reviewing the verdicts of the Constitutional Courts of Iran and Germany. The outcome of this article is that the practice of the Guardian Council and the Federal Constitutional Court is to monitor &quot;transparency&quot; as a verdict and content of law, but the basis of these two institutions are different for this form of control. The Guardian Council carries out oversight of the transparency of the law through Sharia’s oversight, while the Federal Constitutional Court considers the transparency of the law as an introduction to ensure the fundamental rights and freedoms of individuals.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">&quot;Transparency&quot; as one of the qualitative features of the law is one of the important elements in the realization of the legal security of the countries and both the Iran&#039;s Guardian Council and the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany monitor the transparency of the law in various aspects to ensure the realization of quality laws. This article tries to examine and critique and analyze the criteria and method of supervision of the Guardian Council and the Federal Constitutional Court by using a descriptive-analytical method and reviewing the verdicts of the Constitutional Courts of Iran and Germany. The outcome of this article is that the practice of the Guardian Council and the Federal Constitutional Court is to monitor &quot;transparency&quot; as a verdict and content of law, but the basis of these two institutions are different for this form of control. The Guardian Council carries out oversight of the transparency of the law through Sharia’s oversight, while the Federal Constitutional Court considers the transparency of the law as an introduction to ensure the fundamental rights and freedoms of individuals.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Federal Constitutional Court</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Transparency of laws</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Clarity of laws</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Guardian Council</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">accessibility to laws</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">predictability of laws</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Faculty of Law and Political Science</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Public Law Studies Quarterly</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2423-8120</Issn>
				<Volume>50</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2020</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>21</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>The U.S. Extraterritorial Sanctions against Iran and its Compatibility with the World Trade Organization Rules</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>The U.S. Extraterritorial Sanctions against Iran and its Compatibility with the World Trade Organization Rules</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>1545</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>1565</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">77593</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22059/jplsq.2020.291517.2208</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mehdi</FirstName>
					<LastName>Piri</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Prof., Department of Public Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Reza</FirstName>
					<LastName>Sohrabi</LastName>
<Affiliation>MA. Student in International Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0002-7092-5354</Identifier>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2019</Year>
					<Month>10</Month>
					<Day>28</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>The U.S. has imposed extraterritorial sanctions against Iran and thereby impeded free trade for WTO members. In this article, we examined U.S. extraterritorial sanctions against Iran following the United States&#039; unilateral withdrawal from JCPOA and its possible violations of its WTO obligations. Also, while examining the nature of extraterritorial sanctions, the GATT exception rules in particular national security are examined by raising the Russia-Ukraine Transit case of 2019. The study found that, given the scope of the sanctions imposed, the U.S. government has violated some of its obligations under the WTO and in view of the WTO panel interpretation of the defense of national security, the justification for extraterritorial sanctions subsequently imposed after withdrawal from the JCPOA is not acceptable and there are some legal solutions under WTO which enable the States to challenge the U.S. Unilateralism.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">The U.S. has imposed extraterritorial sanctions against Iran and thereby impeded free trade for WTO members. In this article, we examined U.S. extraterritorial sanctions against Iran following the United States&#039; unilateral withdrawal from JCPOA and its possible violations of its WTO obligations. Also, while examining the nature of extraterritorial sanctions, the GATT exception rules in particular national security are examined by raising the Russia-Ukraine Transit case of 2019. The study found that, given the scope of the sanctions imposed, the U.S. government has violated some of its obligations under the WTO and in view of the WTO panel interpretation of the defense of national security, the justification for extraterritorial sanctions subsequently imposed after withdrawal from the JCPOA is not acceptable and there are some legal solutions under WTO which enable the States to challenge the U.S. Unilateralism.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">National Security Exception</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Ukraine Case against Russia 2019</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Extraterritorial Sanction</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">U.S. Sanctions</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">World Trade Organization</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">GATT</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Faculty of Law and Political Science</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Public Law Studies Quarterly</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2423-8120</Issn>
				<Volume>50</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2020</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>21</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Impact of Dual Nationality of Individuals and Nationality of Iranian Companies as a Foreign Investor on ICSID Jurisdiction</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Impact of Dual Nationality of Individuals and Nationality of Iranian Companies as a Foreign Investor on ICSID Jurisdiction</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>1567</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>1586</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">77592</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22059/jplsq.2019.264343.1818</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Khalil</FirstName>
					<LastName>Rouzegari</LastName>
<Affiliation>Ph.D. Student in International &amp; Public Law, Department of International Law, Science and Research branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Sabber</FirstName>
					<LastName>Niavarani</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Prof, Department of International Law, Science and Research branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mohsen</FirstName>
					<LastName>Mohebi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Prof, Department of International Law, Science and Research branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2018</Year>
					<Month>08</Month>
					<Day>26</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>In Iran’s foreign investment law the term “foreign investor” included real and juridical persons such as Iranian companies controlled by foreign shareholders. On the other hand, possibility of a claim against Iran by “foreign investor” in international forums including ICSID, in case of Iran&#039;s accession to the Washington Convention, has been recognized. It raises the question of impact of dual nationality of individuals and nationality of Iranian companies as a foreign investor on ICSID jurisdiction. This paper seeks to find the answer to the question by analyzing awards issued by ICSID. The analysis shows that jurisdiction of ICSID cannot be established mere reliance on the dual nationality by respondent and foreign control by claimant. Instead, the process of establishment of the jurisdiction is subject to subtle legal considerations.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">In Iran’s foreign investment law the term “foreign investor” included real and juridical persons such as Iranian companies controlled by foreign shareholders. On the other hand, possibility of a claim against Iran by “foreign investor” in international forums including ICSID, in case of Iran&#039;s accession to the Washington Convention, has been recognized. It raises the question of impact of dual nationality of individuals and nationality of Iranian companies as a foreign investor on ICSID jurisdiction. This paper seeks to find the answer to the question by analyzing awards issued by ICSID. The analysis shows that jurisdiction of ICSID cannot be established mere reliance on the dual nationality by respondent and foreign control by claimant. Instead, the process of establishment of the jurisdiction is subject to subtle legal considerations.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Iran</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">ICSID</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">dual nationality</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">foreign investor</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Foreign Control</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Faculty of Law and Political Science</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Public Law Studies Quarterly</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2423-8120</Issn>
				<Volume>50</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2020</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>21</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Study of Legal and Political Structure of Government in Abul Ala Mawdudi’s Thought</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Study of Legal and Political Structure of Government in Abul Ala Mawdudi’s Thought</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>1587</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>1606</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">77174</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22059/jplsq.2019.260341.1766</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Yahya</FirstName>
					<LastName>Bouzarinejad</LastName>
<Affiliation>Associate prof. Department of Islamic Social Sciences, Fculty of Social Sciences, University of Tehran; Tehran, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Atiyeh</FirstName>
					<LastName>Azarshab</LastName>
<Affiliation>PhD Candidate of Anthropology, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch; Tehran, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Behrouz</FirstName>
					<LastName>Roustakhiz</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Prof. of Anthropology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Allameh Tabataba&amp;#039;i University, Tehran, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2018</Year>
					<Month>06</Month>
					<Day>17</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>The necessity of thinking on a governmental model especially for thinkers who have always wanted to develop an Islamic State is an obvious need. Sayyad Abul Ala Mawdudi is one of the social reformers and prominent religious thinkers in the geographical area of the subcontinent in the 20th century, and, like many other Islamic thinkers, such discussion can be traced in his religious and political thought. Mawdudi’s thoughts had a wide range of influences on individuals and groups in different countries and thus the present study sought to investigate the kind of desired government and governmental model proposed by him. That’s why; we seek a comprehensive review of the proposed governmental system, its elements and components, and the kind of relations between them. In order to achieve a better understanding of the issue, several books and works including Mawdudi’s works and interpretation of these works have been used. The result of this study shows a special kind of government which Mawdudi has called Theodemocracy and has its own traits that make it distinguished from other governments. In fact, according to Islamic teachings, Mawdudi wants to revive a kind of Islamic State that has a sign of the early Islamic State of prophet and caliphs, and as well as to adapt to the requirements of contemporary times.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">The necessity of thinking on a governmental model especially for thinkers who have always wanted to develop an Islamic State is an obvious need. Sayyad Abul Ala Mawdudi is one of the social reformers and prominent religious thinkers in the geographical area of the subcontinent in the 20th century, and, like many other Islamic thinkers, such discussion can be traced in his religious and political thought. Mawdudi’s thoughts had a wide range of influences on individuals and groups in different countries and thus the present study sought to investigate the kind of desired government and governmental model proposed by him. That’s why; we seek a comprehensive review of the proposed governmental system, its elements and components, and the kind of relations between them. In order to achieve a better understanding of the issue, several books and works including Mawdudi’s works and interpretation of these works have been used. The result of this study shows a special kind of government which Mawdudi has called Theodemocracy and has its own traits that make it distinguished from other governments. In fact, according to Islamic teachings, Mawdudi wants to revive a kind of Islamic State that has a sign of the early Islamic State of prophet and caliphs, and as well as to adapt to the requirements of contemporary times.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">political thought</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Ideology</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Abul Ala Mawdudi</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Islamic Government</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">caliphate</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Faculty of Law and Political Science</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Public Law Studies Quarterly</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2423-8120</Issn>
				<Volume>50</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2020</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>21</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Coastal State’s Criminal Jurisdiction in Foreign Ship Affairs in International Judicial Procedure</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Coastal State’s Criminal Jurisdiction in Foreign Ship Affairs in International Judicial Procedure</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>1607</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>1622</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">77706</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22059/jplsq.2019.266790.1835</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Javad</FirstName>
					<LastName>Salehi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Associate Prof., Department of Law, Payame Nour University, Tehran, Iran</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0002-7402-1176</Identifier>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2018</Year>
					<Month>10</Month>
					<Day>04</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>The marine environment and exploitation of the exclusive economic zone and the continental shelf under the rule of law of the coastal State are according to the provisions of the Convention of the Law of the Sea. Hence, the coastal State’s criminal jurisdiction on third States’ ships in the exclusive economic zone and the free seas is prohibited in most cases. Seizure of a foreign ship and arrest of a foreign crew in offshore areas by the coastal State is State intervention in the administration of the flag State and exercises its sovereignty. Involvement of coastal State in dealing with illegal ship operations in offshore areas is limited to the provisions of articles 73 and 101 Convention of the Law of the Sea on marine living resources or piracy. Extension of the coastal State’s offshore jurisdiction in the use of non-living resources or the operation of oil platforms, where illegal activities by foreign ships and crew of foreign citizenship are not adapted to the provisions of the Convention on the Law of the Sea. The judicial procedure of the Arbitration Tribunal and International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea on case of Arctic Sunrise Ship also confirmed this theory.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">The marine environment and exploitation of the exclusive economic zone and the continental shelf under the rule of law of the coastal State are according to the provisions of the Convention of the Law of the Sea. Hence, the coastal State’s criminal jurisdiction on third States’ ships in the exclusive economic zone and the free seas is prohibited in most cases. Seizure of a foreign ship and arrest of a foreign crew in offshore areas by the coastal State is State intervention in the administration of the flag State and exercises its sovereignty. Involvement of coastal State in dealing with illegal ship operations in offshore areas is limited to the provisions of articles 73 and 101 Convention of the Law of the Sea on marine living resources or piracy. Extension of the coastal State’s offshore jurisdiction in the use of non-living resources or the operation of oil platforms, where illegal activities by foreign ships and crew of foreign citizenship are not adapted to the provisions of the Convention on the Law of the Sea. The judicial procedure of the Arbitration Tribunal and International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea on case of Arctic Sunrise Ship also confirmed this theory.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Coastal State</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Flag State</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Offshore Criminal Jurisdiction</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Exclusive Economic Zone</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Faculty of Law and Political Science</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Public Law Studies Quarterly</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2423-8120</Issn>
				<Volume>50</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2020</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>21</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>The Legal Nature of the Rules of International Organizations: Internal or International</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>The Legal Nature of the Rules of International Organizations: Internal or International</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>1623</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>1642</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">77604</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22059/jplsq.2019.270383.1870</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mahdi</FirstName>
					<LastName>Haddadi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Prof., Department of International and Public law, Farabi Faculty, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Reza</FirstName>
					<LastName>Esmkhani</LastName>
<Affiliation>Ph.D. Student in International Law, Farabi Faculty, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2018</Year>
					<Month>11</Month>
					<Day>28</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Since the emergence of the international organizations, it was presumed two functions for these new entities: international organizations as independent actors and as vehicles for States. In light of these two functions, two points of view about legal nature of the law produced inside IOs are raised. According to the first point of view (constituent instruments as constitution) rules of international organizations just like rules of States, were considered part of the internal law of IOs and isolated from international law. According to the second point of view (constituent instruments as a contract) rules of organizations were merely part of international law. Each of these two views has totally different effects on areas of characterization of acts, international responsibility and sequence of rules of international organizations. In this article after enumerating gaps and insufficiencies of each of these two views, it is argued that adoption of a two-dimensional (internal and international) approach regarding nature of rules of international organizations, while protecting the legal autonomy of international organizations, will help to prevent fragmentation of international law.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Since the emergence of the international organizations, it was presumed two functions for these new entities: international organizations as independent actors and as vehicles for States. In light of these two functions, two points of view about legal nature of the law produced inside IOs are raised. According to the first point of view (constituent instruments as constitution) rules of international organizations just like rules of States, were considered part of the internal law of IOs and isolated from international law. According to the second point of view (constituent instruments as a contract) rules of organizations were merely part of international law. Each of these two views has totally different effects on areas of characterization of acts, international responsibility and sequence of rules of international organizations. In this article after enumerating gaps and insufficiencies of each of these two views, it is argued that adoption of a two-dimensional (internal and international) approach regarding nature of rules of international organizations, while protecting the legal autonomy of international organizations, will help to prevent fragmentation of international law.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">International Law</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Internal law</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Rules of International Organizations</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">one-dimensional nature</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">two-dimensional nature</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Faculty of Law and Political Science</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Public Law Studies Quarterly</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2423-8120</Issn>
				<Volume>50</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2020</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Applicable Law and its Effect on Foreign Military Sales (FMS) in Iran-U.S. Claims Tribunal</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Applicable Law and its Effect on Foreign Military Sales (FMS) in Iran-U.S. Claims Tribunal</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>1643</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>1662</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">77576</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22059/jplsq.2018.261823.1789</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Reza</FirstName>
					<LastName>Arab Chadegani</LastName>
<Affiliation>PhD candidate in Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2018</Year>
					<Month>07</Month>
					<Day>12</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Case B-1, as the largest case filed in the Iran-U.S. Claims Tribunal which still is arbitrating, concerns U.S. Foreign Military Sales (FMS) to Iran prior to the Islamic Revolution. The Tribunal was established as a means of ending the challenges between the parties based on Algerian Declarations from 1982. Since independent research has not been done on this case, both in terms of its nature and dimensions and in terms of awards and procedures, using the field documents by the parties, along with a brief description of the nature of the Case B-1 and its background, beside the analysis of the Tribunal procedure in its partial awards, in this research, we attempt to analysis the challenge of determination of applicable law as the most effective choice of the Tribunal on arbitration process. In the light of this analysis, it is possible to examine the manner of the Tribunal to determine the applicable law in this case.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Case B-1, as the largest case filed in the Iran-U.S. Claims Tribunal which still is arbitrating, concerns U.S. Foreign Military Sales (FMS) to Iran prior to the Islamic Revolution. The Tribunal was established as a means of ending the challenges between the parties based on Algerian Declarations from 1982. Since independent research has not been done on this case, both in terms of its nature and dimensions and in terms of awards and procedures, using the field documents by the parties, along with a brief description of the nature of the Case B-1 and its background, beside the analysis of the Tribunal procedure in its partial awards, in this research, we attempt to analysis the challenge of determination of applicable law as the most effective choice of the Tribunal on arbitration process. In the light of this analysis, it is possible to examine the manner of the Tribunal to determine the applicable law in this case.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Claims 2&amp;3</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">partial awards</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Case B-1</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Iran-U.S. Claims Tribunal</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Applicable law</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Faculty of Law and Political Science</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Public Law Studies Quarterly</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2423-8120</Issn>
				<Volume>50</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2020</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>21</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>The Right to Water in the Corpus of International Law and its Protection in Precedents of International Investment Arbitration</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>The Right to Water in the Corpus of International Law and its Protection in Precedents of International Investment Arbitration</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>1683</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>1705</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">77598</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22059/jplsq.2019.288236.2154</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Farshad</FirstName>
					<LastName>Geravand</LastName>
<Affiliation>Ph.D. in International Law, Department of Public Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2019</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>This paper deals with the legal status of the right to water in international law and also its protection through the precedent of water-related international investment tribunals and domestic judicial ones. Right to water has not yet been recognized in a universal treaty but the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights recognized it in General Comment No. 15 as a separate right. This was further buttressed by both UN General Assembly and Human Rights Council resolutions in 2010. This right while facing ambiguities in terms of content, scope and judicial enforcement but the increasing attempts by the States to incorporate it into their national statutes and the supervisory mechanisms adopted by the Human Rights Council all implying that this right is legal and binding. This claim is also reinforced by international customary law. In the end, the author explored the recognition of this right in light of some water-related investment arbitrations to show that how tribunals applied both the right to water and foreign investors’ rights in parallel and with the same weight.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">This paper deals with the legal status of the right to water in international law and also its protection through the precedent of water-related international investment tribunals and domestic judicial ones. Right to water has not yet been recognized in a universal treaty but the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights recognized it in General Comment No. 15 as a separate right. This was further buttressed by both UN General Assembly and Human Rights Council resolutions in 2010. This right while facing ambiguities in terms of content, scope and judicial enforcement but the increasing attempts by the States to incorporate it into their national statutes and the supervisory mechanisms adopted by the Human Rights Council all implying that this right is legal and binding. This claim is also reinforced by international customary law. In the end, the author explored the recognition of this right in light of some water-related investment arbitrations to show that how tribunals applied both the right to water and foreign investors’ rights in parallel and with the same weight.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">General Comment No. 15</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">right to water</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">International investment arbitration</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Bill of Human Rights</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
