Monism on the basis of validity of essentials in Devine legal system which means it is just God who can be the foundation and origin of the indispensable legal code of practice, protect the Devine legal system from realism or practical rationality and also from predicates which is rooted in humanism metaphysics rationality and generally from adversary foundations and origins. On this understanding, intrinsic rationality, state’s determination and custom have not role, but origin of law. Accepting several basis as the meaning of legal pluralism, is the origin of imperativeness of legal basis. There is a change from monism to pluralism in Christian thought and it seems such change, has been established a basis for passing from Devine legal system to modern law loading to the development of natural theory in metaphysics of legal positivism from the source of legal role to foundations and origins of legal basis.
کاپلستون، فردریک چارلز (1388)، تاریخ فلسفه، جلد دوم، فلسفۀ قرون وسطی، از آگوستین تا اسکوتوس، مترجم ابراهیم دادجو، تهران، شرکت انتشارات علمی و فرهنگی.
کلی، جان (1382)، تاریخ مختصر تئوری حقوقی در غرب، ترجمۀ دکتر محمد راسخ، تهران، طرح نو.
کانت، ایمانوئل (1388)، فلسفۀ حقوق، ترجمۀ منوچهر صانعی درهبیدی، تهران، نقش و نگار.
گلدینگ، مارتین پی (1381)، مفهوم حق (1): درآمد تاریخی، در: راسخ، محمد (1381)، حق و مصلحت، مقالاتی در فلسفۀ حقوق، فلسفۀ حق و فلسفۀ ارزش، تهران، طرح نو.
مطهری، مرتضی (1368)، آشنایی با علوم اسلامی، جلد سوم، فقه و اصول فقه، تهران، صدرا.
ملکیان، مصطفی (1379)، تاریخ فلسفۀ غرب، جلد اول و دوم، قم، پژوهشکدۀ حوزه و دانشگاه.
موحد، محمدعلی (1381)، در هوای حق و عدالت، از حقوق طبیعی تا حقوق بشر، تهران، نشر کارنامه.
ب) لاتین
Laurent. Alain (1993), Histoire de l’individualisme. Que sais-je ? Paris. PUF.
Ben Achour, (2004),L'idée de justice naturelle dans la pensée juridique sunnite, In. Mélanges en l’honneur du doyen Sadak Belaïd, C. P. U. , 2004, pp. 159-189
Ben Achour, (Y), (1997), Nature, raison et révélation dans la philosophie du droit des auteurs sunnites, In. Les Droits fondamentaux. Actes des premières Journées scientifiques du réseau Droits fondamentaux de l'AUPELF-UREF, tenues à Tunis du 9 au 12 octobre 1996, Bruxelles : Bruylant, pp. 163-179
Bentham, Jeremy, (1988), Principes de législation et d'économie politique, Paris, Guillaumin
Carré de Malberg, Raymond (2003). Contribution à la théorie générale de l’Etat, T. I. Paris. Dalloz. Réimpression de l’édition 1920 chez Recueil Sirey.
Castel, Robert (1995), Les métamorphoses de la question sociale, Paris, Gallimard
Chéhata, Chafik (1973), La religion et les fondements du droit en Islam, Archives de philosophie du droit, N° 18, pp. 17-25
Chevallier, Jacques (1998). Vers un droit postmoderne. In. Les transformations de la régulation juridique. Droit et Société, Recherches et Travaux, N° 5. Paris. L.G.D.J. P. 21-46
Chroust, Anton-Hermann (1973), The fundamental ideas in St. Augustine’s philosophy of law, In. The American Journal of Jurisprudence. Vol. 18, N° 1, pp. 57-79
Chroust, Anton-Hermann (1944), The philosophy of law of St. Augustine, In. The philosophical Review. Vol. 53. N° 2, pp. 195-202
Del Vecchio. Giorgio. Philosophie du droit. Paris. Dalloz. Réimpression de la 1e édition. (1953). 2003
Donnelly, Jack (1980), Natural law and Right in Aquinas political Thought, In. The western political quarterly, Vol. 33, N° 4, pp. 520-535
Finnis, John, Aquinas (1998), Moral, Political and Legal theory, founders of modern political and social thought, New York, Oxford university press,
Friedmann. W. (1965), Théorie générale du droit, Paris, L. G. D. J.
Grotius(1999), Droit de la guerre et de la paix, Paris, PUF (coll. « Léviathan)
Heinrich, A. Rommen, (1998), The natural law, a study in legal and social history and philosophy, translated by Thomas R. Hanly. Liberty Fund
Jellinek. Georg (2005). L’Etat moderne et son droit. Paris. Édition V. Giard et E. Brière. 1e édition. 1911. T. I. Théorie générale de l’Etat. Réédité par Éditions Panthéon Assas avec la préface d’Olivier Jouanjan.
Kant,Emmanuel, (2000) Théorie et pratique sur un prétendu droit de mentir, Paris, Vrin
Kelsen. Hans (1999). Théorie pure du droit. Traduit par Charles Eisenmann. Paris. Bruylant et L.G.D.J.
Loetscher, Fredrick William (1935), St. Augustin’s Conception of the State, In. Church History, Vol. 4. N° 1, pp. 16-42
Neschke-Hentschke, Ada, (2003), Platonisme politique et théorie du droit naturel ; Contributions à une archéologie de la culture politique europeenne, Vol. II, platonisme politique et jusnaturalisme chrétien, Louvain, Peeters Publishers
Renaut Alain, Sosoe, Lukas, (1991), Philosophie du droit, Paris, PUF
Renoux-Zagame, Marie-France (2003), Du droit de dieu au droit de l'homme, Paris, PUF
Riley, patrick (2009), The philosopher's philosophy of law from the Seventeenth Century to Our Days, New York, Springer
Roux, L. (1992), Hobbes et la loi : presentation, In. Le pouvoir et le droit, Textes réunis par Louis Roux et François Tricaud, Saint-Etienne, Publications de l’université de Saint-Etienne, pp. 9-16
Villey, Michel (2006), La formation de la pensée juridique moderne, Paris, Quadrige/PUF
Shahabi,M . (2016). Legal pluralism in Christian theology and its influences on initiation of formation of modern law. Public Law Studies Quarterly, 45(4), 563-587. doi: 10.22059/jplsq.2016.56440
MLA
Shahabi,M . "Legal pluralism in Christian theology and its influences on initiation of formation of modern law", Public Law Studies Quarterly, 45, 4, 2016, 563-587. doi: 10.22059/jplsq.2016.56440
HARVARD
Shahabi M. (2016). 'Legal pluralism in Christian theology and its influences on initiation of formation of modern law', Public Law Studies Quarterly, 45(4), pp. 563-587. doi: 10.22059/jplsq.2016.56440
CHICAGO
M Shahabi, "Legal pluralism in Christian theology and its influences on initiation of formation of modern law," Public Law Studies Quarterly, 45 4 (2016): 563-587, doi: 10.22059/jplsq.2016.56440
VANCOUVER
Shahabi M. Legal pluralism in Christian theology and its influences on initiation of formation of modern law. PLSQ. 2016;45(4):563-587 (In Persian). doi: 10.22059/jplsq.2016.56440
