Document Type : Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. in Public Law, Faculty of Law, University of Qom, Qom, Iran‎

2 Associate prof. Faculty of Law, University of Qom, Qom, Iran‎

Abstract

In dynamic administrative systems, citizens participate in decision-making through various methods, referred to as “administrative democracy” or “participatory democracy”, whereby the realization of citizens’ effective sovereignty is measured by their level of involvement in the management of public affairs. This study, conducted using a descriptive-analytical approach and library research, aims to introduce different models of citizen participation in administrative activities and their enforcement guarantees. It also seeks to answer the question: How can citizen participation in administrative decisions in our country be evaluated? In other words, what is the current state of administrative democracy in the country, and what legal capacities exist to support it? The findings indicate that administrative participation, in its specific sense, can be applied to general and non-personal administrative decisions and can lead to greater dynamism and efficiency in the administrative system. In Iran’s legal system, there are also adequate legal capacities for citizens to play an active role as the primary holders of power in various domains, and public participation in different matters is formally recognized. However, in practice, a significant gap remains between the current situation and the desired level of participation.

Keywords

Main Subjects

  1. English

    1. A) Books
    2. Craig, Paul, de Burca, Grainne (2003). EU law, texts, cases, and materials, Oxford University Press.
    3. Th Ziamou, T. (2001). Rulemaking, Participation and the Limits of Public Law in the USA and Europe. Ashgate Pub Ltd.

     

    1. B) Articles
    2. Bignami, F. E. (1999). The Democratic Deficit in European Community Rulemaking: A Call for Notice and Comment in Comitology. Harvard International Law Journal, (456), 451-515.
    3. Bugaric, B. (2004). Openness and transparency in public administration: challenges for public law. Wisconsin Journal of International law, (22), 483- 521.
    4. Rose-Ackerman, Susan” American Administrative Law under Siege: Is Germany a Model?. Harvard Law Review, 107(1994): 1279-1302.
    5. Schutter, O. (2002). Europe in Search of its Civil Society. European Law Journal, 8, 198 -202. (In English)
    6. Shapiro, M. (2004). The Institutionalization of European Administrative Space. UC Berkeley: Center for Culture, Organizations and Politics, Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4b839871.

    French

    1. A) Books
    2. Delvolvé , P. (2002). Le Droit administratif. Dalloz.
    3. Gramberger, M. (2022). La participation public dans le cadre de l’evalutation environnementale. commissariat général au développement durable.
    4. Pinel, F. (2018). La participation du citoyen à la décision administrative. Français, Droit Université Rennes 1.
    5. Testard, C. (2018). Pouvoir de décision unilatérale de l’administration et démocratie administrative, LGDJ.

     

    1. B) Articles
    2. Aïdan, G. (2011). De la démocratie administrative à la démocratie sanitaire dans le secteur public de la santé. RFAP, (137-138), 139- 153.
    3. AUBY, J.-M (1956). Le régime juridique de l’avis dans la procédure consultative. Actualité Juridique: Droit Administratif, 53-60.
    4. Chicot, Pierre-Yves (2011). La démocratie administrative: essai de conceptualization. Revue administrative, (64), 138-148.
    5. Prieur, M. (1988). Le droit à l’environnement et les citoyens: la participation. Revue juridique de l'Environnement, (4), 565-583.

     

    References In Persian:

    1. A) Books
    2. Abbasi Lahiji, B. (2015). Comparative Administrative Law. Tehran: Majd Publications (In Persian).
    3. Falahzadeh, A. M. (2014). Comparative administrative law (procedural justice). Tehran: Legal Studies and Research Institute, first edition (In Persian).
    4. Fazaeli, M. (2017). Fair proceedings "International criminal trials". Tehran: Shahrdanesh, 4th edition (In Persian).
    5. Hadavand, M. (2009). Comparative administrative law. Vol. 1, Tehran: Samt Publications, 6th edition (In Persian).
    6. Hadavand, M.; Nejabatkhah, M.; Aghaee, M.; Shams, E.; Hemmati, M.; Yazdani, H.; Jam, F. & Mashhadi, A (2015). Decision-making procedures in administrative law (comparative study). Tehran: Khorsandi Publications, third edition (In Persian).
    7. Rezaei, H. (2016). The right to participation and hearing in administrative decisions. Tehran: Jangal Publications (In Persian).
    8. Tabatabaei Mutamani, M. (2008). Administrative Law, Tehran: Semat Publications, 15th edition (In Persian).

     

    1. B) Article
    2. Nargesian, A. (2008). A look at the evolution of public administration. Culture of Management, (6), 157-195 (In Persian).