Document Type : Article
Authors
1 Assistant Professor of criminal Law, Department of Law, faculty of Human Science, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran
2 Assistant professor of private law, Department of private Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science. university of kharazmi, Iran, Tehran
Abstract
Power and all its elements and the authorities these days cannot be safe from the sharp eyes of the people. Judiciary, judges and courts, both in legal cases and criminal cases, are among the important parts of power. If we understand democracy in the sense that it is the government of the people by the people and for the people, this question arises that judiciary, which is for the people and It is from the people; How the judiciary should be, This article is written in an analytical and descriptive manner and based on its findings it is clear that the people who do not recognize it as a symbol of oppression, will consider its decisions not as court rulings, but as oppressive orders, such a judiciary will not be respected and it will be a source of corruption. Mechanisms should be thought out so that justice is based on democracy. If the judges are not elected by the people, at least the judges' selection committees should be among the personalities accepted by the people and do not have the suspicion of interference from the government, at least in some crimes, People should be involved in power as members of the jury, and in this way they should consider power as their own, even if judges and courts, like other powers, do not consider themselves directly accountable for some reasons, the courts should be important in issuing decisions regarding this matter, whose audience is the general public, to issue a Appropriate judgment and to be impartial in judgments, to be diligent in solving social problems as far as possible in terms of the legal system.
Keywords
Main Subjects
English
- A) Books
- Uzelac, A. (2014). Goals of Civil Justice and Civil Procedure in Contemporary Judicial Systems. Springer International Publishing Switzerland
- Fix-Fierro, H. (2003). Courts, justice and efficiency, Hart Publishing. Oxford
- Foster, D. (1882). Advantages of the Jury System, The North American Review , Nov., 1882, 135(312) (Nov., 1882), 447- 460 Published by: University of Northern Iowa Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/25118214
- Rawls, J. (1999). a theory of justice. harvard university press, usa
- Zariski, A., & Sourdin, T. (2018). What Is Responsive Judging?. springer
- B) Articles
- Berkson, L C(1980). Judicial Selection in the United States. A Special Report, Judicature. 64 (4), Dated: (October 1980) 176-193.
- Dworkin, R. (1996). Freedom’s Law: The Moral Reading of the American Constitution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Flaherty, M. (2015) Self-represented litigants, active adjudication and the Perception of Bias: Issues in Administrative Law. The Dalhousie Law Journal. (38).
- Keenan, D. K. (2004). The Origin and Current Meanings of "Judicial Activism", California Law Review, 92(5), (Oct., 2004), 1441-1477 (37 pages) Published By: California Law Review, Inc.
- Tyler, T. R. (1988). What is Procedural Justice?: Criteria used by Citizens to Assess the Fairness of Legal Procedures, Law & Society Review, 22(1), 103-136 Published by: Blackwell Publishing on behalf of the Law and Society Association.
References In Persian:
- A) Books
- Arendt, H. (2018). Totalitarianism. translated by Mehdi Tadini, Tehran: Nashthalth (In Persian).
- Clark, D. S. (2021). International encyclopedia of comparative law, civil procedure. third volume, translated and researched by Hadi Malek Tabar, Tehran: Publishing Company (In Persian).
- De Tocqueville, A. (2016). Analysis of Democracy in America. translated by Rahmatullah Moghadam Maraghei, Tehran: Scientific and Cultural Publications (In Persian).
- Fan Kangem, R. (2021). International encyclopedia of comparative law, civil procedure. second volume, translated and researched by Hossein Davodi, Tehran: Publishing Company (In Persian).
- Garth, B., & Capletti, M. (2018). International encyclopedia of comparative law, civil procedure. first volume, translated and researched by Hassan Mohseni, Tehran: Publishing Co., Ltd (In Persian).
- Khaleghi, A. (2019). Criminal Procedure Code. second volume, Tehran: Shahr Danesh Publications (In Persian).
- Montesquieu (1984). De l'esprit des lois. translated by Ali Akbar Mehtadi, Tehran: Amir Kabir Publishing House (In Persian).
- Rawls, J. (2017). Political Liberalism. translated by Musa Akrami, Tehran: 3rd edition (In Persian).
- Shams, A. (2002). civil procedure. advanced course, first volume, Tehran: Mizan publishing house (In Persian).
- Woodruff, P. (2015). The First Democracy. translated by Behzad Qadri and Samaneh Farhadi, Tehran: General Knowledge Publications (In Persian).
- B) Articles
- Azizi, I., Amiri, M., Special, Mohammad, R, (2013). the effect of the judge selection method on the independence of the judge in the law of the United States with a view to Iranian law. comparative law researches,17th publications, spring of number 1 (In Persian).
- Rahmani, Q. (2018). Iranian Jury; From the geometry of adaptation in constitutionalism to the art of transformation in the Islamic Republic. Public Law Research Quarterly, 21(62) (In Persian).
- Samai, M., Jabibzadeh, M. J., & Nobahar, R. (2021), virtuous judge; The contribution of virtueism in the theory of judgment. the judiciary law jurnal, 86, (118), Summer, 49-7 (In Persian).
)