Document Type : Article
Authors
1 Associate Professor, Department of Law, Faculty of Law and Social Sciences, Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran.
2 Professor, Department of Law, Faculty of Law and Social Sciences, Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran
3 Associate Professor, Department of Law, Faculty of Law and Social Sciences, Tabriz University , Tabriz, Iran
4 PhD Candidate, Department of Law, Faculty of Law and Social Sciences, Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran
Abstract
Kelsen’s Pure Theory of Law has been considered the most complete expression of positivist legal philosophy. Kelsen regards this theory as “pure” because, by presenting a hierarchical structure of law, it eliminates all non-legal elements from it. However, the inability to cover the basic norm (Grundnorm) and the assumption of its validity have exposed the theory to criticisms. Part of the criticisms directed at Kelsen’s Pure Theory of Law arises from neglecting the purpose of the theory, which is the understanding of legal systems. By taking the purpose of the theory into account, assuming the validity of the basic norm becomes justifiable. In this descriptive-analytical study, it is proposed that the claim of the theory’s purity should be reduced and replaced with a title more consistent with its hierarchical structure. Furthermore, after examining various dimensions of the theory, a plan for legislation and the interpretation of laws based on Kelsen’s Pure Theory of Law is presented, according to which: Legislation must follow a chain-like hierarchical structure leading ultimately to one of the constitutional principles or the basic norm. To overcome potential deadlocks that may arise from excluding non-legal elements in legislation, the idea of the necessity of a “soft constitution” is proposed. Finally, the requirements for legal interpretation and the establishment of judicial precedent are explained.
Keywords
- pure theory of law
- legislation guided by criteria
- constitutional interpretation
- hierarchical structure
- soft constitution
Main Subjects
English
- A) Books
- Heidemann, C. (1997). Die Norm als Tatsache: Zur Normentheorie Hans Kelsens. erste Auflage, Baden-Baden, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.
- Templeman, L. (1997). Jurisprudence: the Philosophy of Law,London: Old Bailey.
- B) Articles
- Heidemann, C. (2013). Facets of ‘Ought’ in Kelsen's Pure Theory of Law. Jurisprudence, 4(2).246-262. DOI:10.5235/20403313.4.2.246.
- Heidemann, C. (1999). Norms, Facts, and Judgments. A Reply to S. L., Paulson. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 19(2), 345-350.
- James McCormick (2001). Scientific medicine fact of fiction The contribution of science to medicine. Occasional Paper (Royal College of General Practitioners), 36(80), 3–6.
- Paulson, S. L. (1998). Four Phases in Hans Kelsen's Legal Theory? Reflections on a Perio.dization Review. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 18(1), 153-166.
- Posner, R.A. (1987) .The Decline of lawas an Autonomous Discipline: 1962-1987, Harvard Law Review – Febrary 1987, 100(2), 761-780.
Germany
- Moriya, K. (2003). Die Struktur der Frage: Wozu Rechtsgeschichte?“, Rechtsgeschichte (Legal History). Journal of the Max Planck Institute for European Legal History, 3(3).49-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.12946/rg03/049-057.
Refrences In Persian:
- Holy Quran.
- Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran.
- Abdali, M. (2014). An Introduction to the Philosophy of Law and Legal Theories. Tehran: Majd, Second Edition (In Persian).
- Badini, H. (2006). Is the Science of Law an Independent Discipline?. Journal of the Faculty of Law and Political Science, (74) (In Persian).
- Bahrani, M. (2013). Discipline, Interdiscipline, and Classification of Sciences. Quarterly Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 5(2) (In Persian).
- Copleston, F. C. (2001). History of Philosophy. translated by Jalaluddin Mojtabawi, Tehran: Scientific and Cultural Publishing Company (Soroush), Fourth Edition (In Persian).
- Darabkalayi, M. H. (2012). A Journey Through Sovereignty (Natural Law, Contractualism, and Sovereignty). Qom: Research Institute of Seminary and University & Samt, First Edition (In Persian).
- Elahiyari, F. & Bijani, T. (2010). An Analytical Historical Approach to the Grounds of the Rise and Hegemony of Fascism in Italy after World War I. Quarterly Scientific-Research Journal of History, 5(18) (In Persian).
- Emami, A., Taheri, M., & Aghaei Bajestani, M. (2022). Protection of Rights and Trade Union Freedoms in the Judicial Practice of Iran and the USA. Monthly Scientific Journal of Political Sociology of Iran, 5(11) (In Persian).
- Gorji Azandriani, A. A. (2014). Constitutional Courts. Tehran: Mizaan, Second Edition (In Persian).
- Hakim, Mohammad Taqi bin Mohammad Said (1997). Al-Usul al-Aama Fi al-Fiqh al-Muqaren. Qom: World Assembly of Ahl al-Bayt, Second Edition (In Persian).
- Jafari Langarudi, Mohammad Jafar, (2004) General Introduction to the Science of Law. Tehran: Ganj Danesh, Ninth Edition (In Persian).
- Katouzian, N. (2014). Introduction to the Science of Law and Study in the Iranian Legal System. Tehran: Sahami Enteshar, Ninety-Fifth Edition (In Persian).
- Kelsen, H. (2012). Pure Theory of Law: An Introduction to Legal Theory Issues. translated by Esmail Nematollahi, Qom: Research Institute of Seminary and University, Second Edition (In Persian).
- Khoeeini, G. (2018). Philosophy of Law. Tehran: Majd, Second Edition (In Persian).
- Khosroshahi, Ghodratollah, (2012), Legal Theories and Systems, Tehran: Jungle, First Edition (In Persian).
- Koffman, A. S. (2017). Moral and Legal Responsibility. translated by Sophia, First Edition (In Persian).
- Madani, S. J. (2013). Judicial Procedure. Tehran: Paydar, Twenty-Second Edition (In Persian).
- Mehraram, P. (2021). The Distinction Between Law and Morality in Hans Kelsen’s Theory of Legal Obligation. Philosophical Reflections (In Persian).
- Rahmat Elahi, H., & Aghamohammad Aghaei, E. (2020). Natural Law and Positive Law and Their Effects on Power Structure and Public Law. Tehran: Majd, Second Edition (In Persian).
- Sadeghi, M. (2006). A Critical Study of Hans Kelsen's Thoughts. Journal of the Faculty of Law and Political Science, (74) (In Persian).
- Shahabi, M. (1942). Lectures on Principles. Tehran: Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance, Organization for Printing and Publication, Seventh Edition (In Persian).
- The Foundations of the Positivity of Law: A Critique of Kelsen’s Pure Theory of Law, Office for Fundamental Governmental Studies, Research Center of the Islamic Consultative Assembly (Parliament of Iran), https://rc.majlis.ir/, last accessed: October 21, 2022 (In Persian).
- Tibet, M. (2005). Philosophy of Law, translated by Hassan Rezaei Khavari, Mashhad: Razavi University of Islamic Sciences, First Edition (In Persian).
- Vizheh, M. R. (2013). An Analysis of the State and Legal Order. Legal Studies, (8) (In Persian).
)