Document Type : Article
Authors
1 Associate Professor, Department of Law, Faculty of Law and Social Sciences, Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran.
2 Professor, Department of Law, Faculty of Law and Social Sciences, Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran
3 Associate Professor, Department of Law, Faculty of Law and Social Sciences, Tabriz University , Tabriz, Iran
4 PhD Candidate, Department of Law, Faculty of Law and Social Sciences, Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran
Abstract
Kelsen's pure theory of law is considered the most complete expression of legal positivist philosophy. Kelsen calls it "pure" because removes all non-legal elements by providing a hierarchical legal structure. However, the inability to encompass the fundamental norm and the assumption of its validity expose the theory to criticisms. Part of the criticisms directed at this theory stem from neglecting the objective of it (understanding legal systems). By taking into account the goal of the theory, assuming the validity of the fundamental norm can be justified.In this research, based on a descriptive and analytical method, it is suggested that the claim of the "purity" of this legal theory should be reconsidered and replaced with a more appropriate title that reflects the hierarchical structure. Furthermore, a plan has been presented for legislation and interpretation based on this theory. Based on this plan, firstly, legislation must follow a chain-like and hierarchical structure to reach one of the constitutional principles or the fundamental norm. Secondly, to avoid potential deadlocks that may arise from excluding non-legal elements in legislation, the idea of the necessity of a soft constitution has been proposed. Finally, the requirements for legal interpretation and the establishment of judicial precedent have been explained.
Keywords
- Pure Theory of Law
- Legislation guided by criteria
- Constitutional Interpretation
- Hierarchical Structure
- Soft Constitution
Main Subjects
English
- A) Books
- Heidemann, C. (1997). Die Norm als Tatsache: Zur Normentheorie Hans Kelsens. erste Auflage, Baden-Baden, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.
- Templeman, L. (1997). Jurisprudence: the Philosophy of Law,London: Old Bailey.
- B) Articles
- Heidemann, C. (2013). Facets of ‘Ought’ in Kelsen's Pure Theory of Law. Jurisprudence, 4(2).246-262. DOI:10.5235/20403313.4.2.246.
- Heidemann, C. (1999). Norms, Facts, and Judgments. A Reply to S. L., Paulson. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 19(2), 345-350.
- James McCormick (2001). Scientific medicine fact of fiction The contribution of science to medicine. Occasional Paper (Royal College of General Practitioners), 36(80), 3–6.
- Paulson, S. L. (1998). Four Phases in Hans Kelsen's Legal Theory? Reflections on a Perio.dization Review. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 18(1), 153-166.
- Posner, R.A. (1987) .The Decline of lawas an Autonomous Discipline: 1962-1987, Harvard Law Review – Febrary 1987, 100(2), 761-780.
Germany
- Moriya, K. (2003). Die Struktur der Frage: Wozu Rechtsgeschichte?“, Rechtsgeschichte (Legal History). Journal of the Max Planck Institute for European Legal History, 3(3).49-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.12946/rg03/049-057.
Refrences In Persian:
- Holy Quran.
- Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran.
- Abdali, M. (2014). An Introduction to the Philosophy of Law and Legal Theories. Tehran: Majd, Second Edition (In Persian).
- Badini, H. (2006). Is the Science of Law an Independent Discipline?. Journal of the Faculty of Law and Political Science, (74) (In Persian).
- Bahrani, M. (2013). Discipline, Interdiscipline, and Classification of Sciences. Quarterly Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 5(2) (In Persian).
- Copleston, F. C. (2001). History of Philosophy. translated by Jalaluddin Mojtabawi, Tehran: Scientific and Cultural Publishing Company (Soroush), Fourth Edition (In Persian).
- Darabkalayi, M. H. (2012). A Journey Through Sovereignty (Natural Law, Contractualism, and Sovereignty). Qom: Research Institute of Seminary and University & Samt, First Edition (In Persian).
- Elahiyari, F. & Bijani, T. (2010). An Analytical Historical Approach to the Grounds of the Rise and Hegemony of Fascism in Italy after World War I. Quarterly Scientific-Research Journal of History, 5(18) (In Persian).
- Emami, A., Taheri, M., & Aghaei Bajestani, M. (2022). Protection of Rights and Trade Union Freedoms in the Judicial Practice of Iran and the USA. Monthly Scientific Journal of Political Sociology of Iran, 5(11) (In Persian).
- Gorji Azandriani, A. A. (2014). Constitutional Courts. Tehran: Mizaan, Second Edition (In Persian).
- Hakim, Mohammad Taqi bin Mohammad Said (1997). Al-Usul al-Aama Fi al-Fiqh al-Muqaren. Qom: World Assembly of Ahl al-Bayt, Second Edition (In Persian).
- Jafari Langarudi, Mohammad Jafar, (2004) General Introduction to the Science of Law. Tehran: Ganj Danesh, Ninth Edition (In Persian).
- Katouzian, N. (2014). Introduction to the Science of Law and Study in the Iranian Legal System. Tehran: Sahami Enteshar, Ninety-Fifth Edition (In Persian).
- Kelsen, H. (2012). Pure Theory of Law: An Introduction to Legal Theory Issues. translated by Esmail Nematollahi, Qom: Research Institute of Seminary and University, Second Edition (In Persian).
- Khoeeini, G. (2018). Philosophy of Law. Tehran: Majd, Second Edition (In Persian).
- Khosroshahi, Ghodratollah, (2012), Legal Theories and Systems, Tehran: Jungle, First Edition (In Persian).
- Koffman, A. S. (2017). Moral and Legal Responsibility. translated by Sophia, First Edition (In Persian).
- Madani, S. J. (2013). Judicial Procedure. Tehran: Paydar, Twenty-Second Edition (In Persian).
- Mehraram, P. (2021). The Distinction Between Law and Morality in Hans Kelsen’s Theory of Legal Obligation. Philosophical Reflections (In Persian).
- Rahmat Elahi, H., & Aghamohammad Aghaei, E. (2020). Natural Law and Positive Law and Their Effects on Power Structure and Public Law. Tehran: Majd, Second Edition (In Persian).
- Sadeghi, M. (2006). A Critical Study of Hans Kelsen's Thoughts. Journal of the Faculty of Law and Political Science, (74) (In Persian).
- Shahabi, M. (1942). Lectures on Principles. Tehran: Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance, Organization for Printing and Publication, Seventh Edition (In Persian).
- The Foundations of the Positivity of Law: A Critique of Kelsen’s Pure Theory of Law, Office for Fundamental Governmental Studies, Research Center of the Islamic Consultative Assembly (Parliament of Iran), https://rc.majlis.ir/, last accessed: October 21, 2022 (In Persian).
- Tibet, M. (2005). Philosophy of Law, translated by Hassan Rezaei Khavari, Mashhad: Razavi University of Islamic Sciences, First Edition (In Persian).
- Vizheh, M. R. (2013). An Analysis of the State and Legal Order. Legal Studies, (8) (In Persian).
)