Public Law Studies Quarterly

Current Issue

By Issue

By Author

Author Index

Keyword Index

Journal About

Editorial Board

Journal Aim Scope

News

Journal FAQ

Journal Links

Guide for Authors

Author Guidelines for Manuscript Submission

Reviewers List

Justiciability of Human Economic and Social Rights Based upon the Constitutions; Special Focus on the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran

Articles in Press

Document Type : Article

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Department of Public Law, Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

2 MA in Human Rights Law, Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

10.22059/jplsq.2025.386080.3638

Abstract

Human Economic and Social Rights protect the fundamental needs of human beings; nevertheless, reasons, including progressiveness, vagueness, and restricted resources, have made scholars and the executive bodies consider these rights unjusticiable. This research, by using a Descriptive-Analytical method and referencing documents, cases, and theories, first tries to discover the justiciability of Economic and Social Rights and then analyses the textual status of constitutions, with special regard to the Constitution of Iran, for the purpose of specifying those rights and identifying them as justiciable. This research firstly concludes that available documents undermine the unjusticiability view and validate the enforcement of these rights by judicial review; secondly, the text of the constitutions is the primary instrument to specify the rights that either can be claimed based upon the text autonomously or judicial interpretation of the text would enforce the rights; Subsequently, it concludes, although a striking number of Economic and Social Rights has been enshrined in the Constitution of Iran, none of them is justiciable except for Right to Own Property hence fulfillment of them requires solutions excluding the text of the constitution; Furthermore Divan Edalat Edari (= Court of Administrative Justice), in accordance with Article 173 of the Constitution of Iran, has had a prominent role in the implementation and commitment of Iran's Government to the aforementioned rights.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. English

    1. A) Books
    2. Boyle, K. (2020). Economic and Social Rights Law. New York: Routledge.
    3. Boyle, K. (2018). Models of Incorporation and Justiciability for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Scotland: Scottish Human Rights Commission.
    4. Cichon, M., & Hagemejer, K. (2006). Social Security for All: Investing in Global Social and Economic Development. Geneva: ILO Social Security Department.
    5. Langford, M. (2008). Social Rights Jurisprudence Emerging Trends in International and Comparative Law. New York: Cambridge University.

     

    1. B) Articles
    2. Addo, M. K. (1988). The Justiciability of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Commonwealth Law Bulletin, 14, 1425-1432.
    3. Agbakwa, S. C. (2002). Reclaiming Humanity: Economic, Social and Cultural Rights as the Cornerstone of African Human Rights. Yale Human Rights and Development Law, 5, 177-216.
    4. Agbor, A. A. (2017). Shifting the Matrix from Legal Passivity to a New Domestic Legal Order: Towards the Justiciability of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in Cameroon. African Journal of International and Comparative Law, 25, 176-198.
    5. Ashiagbor, D. (2004). Economic and Social Rights in the European Charter of Fundamental Rights. European Human Rights Law Review, 1, 62-72.
    6. Chong, D. P. A. (2009). Five Challenges to Legalizing Economic and Social Rights. Human Rights Review, 10, 183-204.
    7. Choukroune, L. (2005). Justiciability of Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights: The UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights' Review of China's First Periodic Report on the Implementation of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Columbia Journal of Asian Law, 19, 30-49.
    8. Cohen, M., & Dagenais, M. O. (2021). The Implementation of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in Canada: Between Utopia and Reality. Constitutional Review, 7, 26-52.
    9. Dennis, M. J., & Stewart, D. P. (2004). Justiciability of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Should Be an International Complaints Mechanism to Adjudicate the Rights to Food, Water, Housing and Health?. The American Journal of International Law, 98, 462-515.
    10. Desai, D. (2009). Courting Legitimacy: Democratic Agency and the Justiciability of Economic and Social Rights. Interdisciplinary Journal of Human Rights Law, 4, 25-42.
    11. Dinokopila, B. R. (2013). The Justiciability of Socio-Economic Rights in Botswana. Journal of African Law, 57, 108-125.
    12. Ebadolahi, M. (2008). Using Structural Interdicts and the South African Human Rights Commission to Achieve Judicial Enforcement of Economic and Social Rights in South Africa. New York University Law Review, 83, 1565-1606.
    13. Handayani, I. (2018). Justiciability of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in International Law and Its Future Implementation in Indonesia. Yustisia, 7, 451-474.
    14. Harvey, P. (2004). Aspirational Law. Buffalo Law Review, 52, 701-726.
    15. Jung, C.; Hirschl, R., & Rosevear, E. (2014). Economic and Social Rights in National Constitutions. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 62, 1043-1093.
    16. Khalil, A. (2019). Courting Economic and Social Rights in Palestine: Justiciability, Enforceability and the Role of the Supreme Constitutional Court. College of Law UAE University, 77, 1-29.
    17. Khan, U. M. (2016). The Justiciability of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Towards a Coherent Judicial Test. Human Rights Review, 4, 1-40.
    18. Kiema, W. (2019). A Case for Structural Interdicts in Enforcing Socio-Economic Rights in Kenya. Kenya Law Review, 7, 136-160.
    19. Kutigi, H. (2017). Towards Justiciability of Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights in Nigeria: A Role for Canadian-Nigerian Cooperation. Transnational Human Rights Review, 4, 125-145.
    20. Lichuma, C. O. (2021). In International Law We (Do Not) Trust: The Persistent Rejection of Economic and Social Rights As a Manifestation of Cynicism. In Cynical International Law?. edited by Baade, B.; Burchardt, D.; Feihle, P.; Köppen, A.; Mührel, L.; Riemer, L. & Schäfer, R.. Berlin: Springer, 195-214.
    21. Mabbett, D. (2008). Aspirational Legalism and the Role of the Equality and Human Rights Commission in Equality Policy. The Political Quarterly, 79, 45-52.
    22. Mapulanga-Hulston, J. K. (2002). Examining the Justiciability of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. The International Journal of Human Rights, 6, 29-48.
    23. Mbuya, A. P. (2019). Justiciability of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in Tanzania. East African Journal of Social and Applied Sciences, 1, 16-30.
    24. Mollah, M. A. I. H. (2020). Assessment into Feasibility of Ratifying the OP-ICESCR from the Context of Justiciability of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in Bangladesh. International Human Rights Law Review, 9, 118-134.
    25. Nkongolo, C. JR. K. (2014). The Justiciability of Socio-Economic Rights under the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights: Appraisal and Perspectives Three Decades After Its Adoption. African Journal of International and Comparative Law, 22, 492-511.
    26. Nwobike, J. C. (2005). The African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights and the Demystification of Second and Third Generation Rights under the African Charter: Social and Economic Rights Action Center (SERAC) and the Center for Economic and Social Rights (CESR) v. Nigeria. African Journal of Legal Studies, 2, 129-146.
    27. Olayinka, O. F. (2019). Implementing the Socio-Economic and Cultural Rights in Nigeria and South Africa: Justiciability of Economic Rights. African Journal of International and Comparative Law, 27, 564-587.
    28. Omara, A. (2020). Enforcing Nonjusticiable Rights in Indonesia. Constitutional Review, 6, 311-337.
    29. Pasqualucci, J. M. (2008). The Right to a Dignified Life (Vida Digna): The Integration of Economic and Social Rights with Civil and Political Rights in the Inter-American Human Rights System. Hastings International and Comparative Law Review, 31,1-32.
    30. Shehu, A. T. (2013). The Enforcement of Social and Economic Rights in Africa: The Nigerian Experience. Afe Babalola University: Journal of Sustainable Development Law and Policy, 2, 101-120.
    31. Singh, S. (2020). Realizing Economic and Social Rights in Nepal: The Impact of a Progressive Constitution and an Experimental Supreme Court. Harvard Human Rights Journal, 33, 275-310.
    32. Stacey, R. (2017). Dynamic Regulatory Constitutionalism: Taking Legislation Seriously in the Judicial Enforcement of Economic and Social Rights. Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy, 31, 85-128.
    33. Tinta, M. F. (2007). Justiciability of Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights in the Inter-American System of Protection of Human Rights: Beyond Traditional Paradigms and Notions. Human Rights Quarterly, 29, 431-459.
    34. Trispiotis, I. (2010). Socio-Economic Rights: Legally Enforceable or Just Aspirational?. Opticon, 8, 1-10.
    35. Waqar Khan Arif, S. M. A. (2018). Economic, Social and Cultural Rights of Women: International Legal Framework, Justiciability and Challenges. International Journal of Law and Management, 1, 1-28.
    36. Whelan, D. J., & Donnelly, J. (2007). The West, Economic and Social Rights, and the Global Human Rights Regime: Setting the Record Straight. Human Rights Quarterly, 29, 908-949.
    37. Wiles, E. (2006). Aspirational Principles or Enforceable Rights - The Future for Socio-Economic Rights in National Law. American University International Law Review, 22, 35-64.
    38. Woods, J. M. (2003). Justiciable Social Rights as a Critique of the Liberal Paradigm. Texas International Law Journal, 38, 763-794.
    39. Young, K. G. (2008). The Minimum Core of Economic and Social Rights: A Concept in Search of Content. Yale Journal of International Law, 33, 113-176.

     

    1. C) Documents
    2. Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR). "INT/CESCR/GEC/4758/E, General Comment No. 3: The Nature of States Parties’ Obligations (Art. 2 (1))", 5th Session, 1990.
    3. Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR). "INT/CESCR/GEC/6430/E, General Comment No. 7: The Right to Adequate Food (Art. 11 (1))", 16th Session, 1997.
    4. Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR). "E/C.12/1998/24, General Comment No. 9: The Domestic Application of the Cevenant", 19th Session, 1998.
    5. Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR). "E/C.12/1999/5, General Comment No. 12: The Right to Adequate Food (Art. 11)", 20th Session, 1999.
    6. Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR). "E/C.12/1999/10, General Comment No. 13: The Right to Education (Art. 13)", 21st Session, 1999.
    7. Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR). "E/C.12/GC/19, General Comment No. 19: The Right to Social Security (Art. 9)", 39th Session, 2007.
    8. Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR). "E/C.12/GC/24, General Comment No. 24: State Obligations under the International Covenant on Economic Social and Cultural Rights in the Context of Business Activities", 61st Session, 2017.
    9. FAO Council. "Voluntary Guidelines to Support the Progressive Realization of the Right to Adequate Food in the Context of National Food Security", 127th Session, 2004.
    10. D) Cases
    11. African Commission on Human Rights, Communication No. 155/96, SERAC and CESR v. Nigeria, 2002.
    12. African Commission on Human Rights, Communication No. 241/2001, Purohit and Moore v. Gambia, 2003.
    13. European Committee of Social Rights, Complaint No. 13/2002, International Association Autisme-Europe (IAAE) v. France, 2003.
    14. Indian Supreme Court, 3 S.C.R. 545, Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation, 1985.
    15. Indian Supreme Court, 1 S.C.R. 594, Unni Krishnan v. State of Andhra Pradesh, 1993.
    16. Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, Case No. 12.249, Jorge Odir Miranda Cortez et al. v. El Salvador, 2009.
    17. Inter-American Court on Human Rights, Case No. 12.189, Dilcia Yean and Violeta Bosica v. Dominican Republic, 2005.
    18. South African Constitutional Court, [1997] ZACC 17, 1998 (1) SA 765, Soobramoney v. Minister of Health (KwaZulu-Natal), 1997.
    19. South African Constitutional Court, [2000] ZACC 19, 2001 (1) SA 46, South Africa v. Grootboom, 2000.
    20. South African Constitutional Court, (No. 2) [2002] ZACC 15, 2002 (5) SA 721, Minister of Health v. Treatment Action Campaign, 2002.

     

    References in Persian:

    1. A) Books
    2. Bronstein, A. (2014). International and Comparative Labour Law: Current Challenges. Translated by Saeed Reza Abadi & Asli Abbasi. Tehran: Derak (In Persian).
    3. Abbasi, B. (2016). Les Droits de l’homme et les Libertes. Tehran: Dadgostar Pub (In Persian).
    4. Craven, M. C. R. (2008). International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: A Perspective on Its Development. Translated by Mohammad Habibi Mojandeh. Qom: Mofid University (In Persian).
    5. Wallace, R., & Martin-Ortega, O (2017). International Law. Translated by Seyed Ghasem Zamani & Mahnaz Bahramlu. Tehran: Shahre Danesh (In Persian).
    6. Hakki, F. (2009). Human Economic-Social Rights in Iran. Tehran: Shahre Danesh (In Persian).

     

    1. B) Articles
    2. Asadollahi, S.; Gorji Azandariani, A. A.; Abbasi, B., & Niavarani, S. (2021). Tazmine Qaza’e va Akhlaghiye Hoghoughe Eghtesadi, Ejtema’e va Farhangi dar Nezame Hoghoughiye Jomhouriye Eslamiye Iran. Ethical Research, 11 (2), 5-26 (In Persian).
    3. Amir Arjmand, A., & Hemmati, M. (2007). Barresi va Tahlile Tazminate Hoghoughe Eghtesadi va Ejtema’ieye beinolmelal (Hoghoughe Refahi) dar Nezame Hoghoughiye Dakheli. Nashriyeye Elahiat va Hoghough, 23, 27-46 (In Persian).
    4. Amini Pazouh, H., & Esma’eeli, M. (2016). Tahlile Mahiyat va Nezame Hoghoughiye Hakem bar Ta’ahhodate Dolat dar Misaghe Beinolmelaliye Hoghoughe Eghtesadi, Ejtema’e va Farhangi va Qanoune Asasiye Jomhouriye Eslamiye Iran. Quarterly Journal of Public Law Knowledge, 5 (14), 69-94 (In Persian).
    5. Javid, E., & Niavarani, S. (2014). The Scope of the Right to Health in International Human Rights Law. Public Law Research, 15 (41), 47-70 (In Persian).
    6. Jalali, M., & Saeedi Roshan, H. (2016). The Role of Administration Justice Court in Protecting the Constitution. The Judiciary Law Journal, 80 (94), 117-140. https://doi.org/10.22106/jlj.2016.22010 (In Persian).
    7. Chenani, N. (2015). Qezavatpaziriye Hoghoughe Eghtesadi, Ejtema’e va Farhangi. Barcelona: The Paper Submitted in International Conference on Engineering Sciences, Art and Law (In Persian).
    8. Heidarpour, H., & Tanha, Zh. B. (2018). Jaigahe Haghe bar Tamin Ejtema’e va Haghe bar Salamat va Dadkhahi Paziriye Anha dar Asnade beinolmelali va dar Hoghoughe Iran. Tehran: The Paper Submitted in 11th National Congress of the Pioneers of the Progress (In Persian).
    9. Sadat Akhavi, S. A. (2009). Draft Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (4 May 2008). Private Law Studies Quarterly, 38 (4), 221-237. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.25885618.1387.38.4.11.4 (In Persian).
    10. Shahbazi, A.; Ranjbar, A., & Sadeghi, M. (2024). The Relevant Factors in the Justiciability of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Public Law Studies Quarterly, 53 (4), 2159-2183. https://doi.org/10.22059/jplsq.2021.315317.265 (In Persian).
    11. Zarouni, D.; Gorji Azandariani, A. A., & Behbudian, B. (2022). Citation of Constitutional Principles of the Judgments of the Courts. Public Law Research, 23 (74), 69-105. https://doi.org/10.22054/qjpl.2021.58018.2546 (In Persian).
    12. Esmati, Z., & Kolivand, H. (2014). Judicabilty of the Right to Social Security: A Comparative Study in Iranian and English Law, in the Light of International Human Rights Instruments. The Judiciary Law Journal, 78 (85), 83-112. https://doi.org/10.22106/jlj.2014.11321 (In Persian).
    13. Kokabisaghi, F. (2016). Justiciabilty of the Right ot Health in International Legal System. Medical Law Journal, 10 (37), 7-33 (In Persian).
    14. Moshrefjavadi, Z.; Zamani, S. Gh., & Ebrahimi, Z. (2022). The Justiciability of the Right to Housing in International Human Rights law and the Iranian Legal System. Public Law Studies Quarterly, 52 (3), 1165-1184. https://doi.org/10.22059/jplsq.2019.280846.2006 (In Persian).
    15. Hemmati, T., & Tabataba’e, S. M. S. (2017). Dadkhahi va Hoghoughe Shahrvandi. Journal of Civil Rights Studies, 3, 113-135 (In Persian).
Public Law Studies Quarterly

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 22 March 2027
Files
History
  • Receive Date: 26 November 2024
  • Revise Date: 11 February 2025
  • Accept Date: 05 May 2025
Share
How to cite
Statistics