Public Law Studies

The Formation of the Knowledge Structure of Criminal Law in light of the Modern-Governance Idea

Document Type : Article

Authors

Zahra Sarempour 1
Seyyed Saeid Mousavi asl 2
Mohammad hadi sadeghi 3

1 Ph.D. Student in criminal law and criminology, Department of criminal law and criminology, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of shiraz, shiraz, Iran

2 Assistant Pro., Department of criminal law and criminology, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Shiraz, Shiraz, Iran

3 ,Associate Prof., Department of criminal law and criminology, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of shiraz, shiraz, Iran.

https://doi.org/10.22059/jplsq.2025.397794.3775
Abstract
The knowledge of criminal law, as a modern branch of knowledge influenced by the transformations of the European Renaissance and the evolutions of the Enlightenment era, and based on fundamental changes in legal and political thought, possesses a structure that has materialized based on the nature of the state and the logic of modern governance. The separation of the public sphere from the private sphere and the formation of the nation-state identity paved the ground for politics to transcend religious perspectives, as well as virtue ethics and the teleology of governance; In such a way that the new governance adopts a mechanical approach based on the rationality of state interest. By focusing on the construction of the state based on the autonomous will and reason of humankind, the preservation of the state and the mechanism of governance gain centrality with a secular perspective, independent of traditional and religious logic. It is in this context, that modern criminal law finds its existence and limitations within the framework of modern governance and its exigencies. It reclaims its identity as the most important part of public law, and its knowledge structure is formulated based on state-centric governance and oriented towards the police state and the military-diplomatic apparatus. It is self-evident that this knowledge structure, considering its foundations and premises, lacks the capacity for convergence and linkage with religious approaches to criminal law, such as Islamic criminal jurisprudence.

Keywords

public sphere
criminal law
structure
governance
knowledge
nation-state.
Subjects

  1. English

    1. Books
    2. Smith, D. (1995). Nations and Nationalism in Global Era. London: Polity.
    3. Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, London: Verso edition and New Left Boks.
    4. Brown, D. (2001). "Governmentality and Law and Order." Rethinking Law, Society and Governance: Foucault’s Bequest. Ed. Gary Wickham & George Pavlich. London: Hart.
    5. Chiao, V. (2018). Criminal Law in the Age of the Administrative State. Oxford University.
    6. Farmer, L. (2016). Making the Modern Criminal Law: Criminalization and Civil Oder. Oxford University.
    7. Foucault, M. (2007). Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège de France.
    8. Hobes, T. (1998). Leviathan. edited with an introduction and notes by J. C. A. Gaskin, New York: Oxford University.
    9. Locke, J. (1988). Two Treaties of Government. Cambridge University.
    10. Loughlin, M. (2017). Political Jurisprudence. Oxford University.
    11. Pool, T. (2015). reason of state: Law, Prerogative and Empire, Prerogative in early-modern state theory. Cambridge University.
    12. Rousseau, J. J. (1999). Discourse on Political Economy and The Social contract. Translated with an Introduction and Notes by Christopher Betts, Oxford University.
    13. Skinner, Q. (2002). ‘ From the State of Princes to the Person of the State’ in Skinner , Visions of Politics. Vol. II: Renaissance Virtues, Cambridge: Cambridge University.
    14. Strauss, L. (1957). Natural Right and History. Chicago, London, University Chicago.
    15. Tawney, R. H. (2008). Religion and the Rise of Capitalism. Transaction Publishers, ch. 5 n. 22.
    16. M.(1992). From politic to reason of state. Cambridge University.

     

    1. Articles
    2. Curtis, C., & Martin Jones, D. (2011). Reason of State, Natural Law, and Early Modern Statecraft. Parergon, 28, (2), 1-4
    3. Garland, D. (1997). “Governmentality and the Problem of Crime:: Foucault, Criminology, sociology”, Theoretical Criminology. 1 (2), 173-214.
    4. Hildebrandt, M. (2008). Governance, Governmentality, Police, and Justice: A New Science of Police?, 56 Buff. L. Rev. 557.
    5. Rosenberg, J. (1992). Secret origins of the state: the structural basis of raison d'état. Review of International Studies. 18 (2), April, 131-159.

     

    References In Persian:

    1. A) Books
    2. Blum, W. T. (1994). Theories of the Political System. Translated by Ahmad Tadayyon, Tehran: Aran, Vol. 2 (In Persian).
    3. Foucault, M. (2017). The Birth of Biopolitics. Translated by Reza Najafzadeh, Tehran: Ney (In Persian).
    4. Ghannadan, Mansour, Motiee, Nahid & Sotoudeh, Hedayatollah (2000). Sociology: Key Concepts. Avay-e Noor (In Persian).
    5. Held, D.(2007). The Formation of the Modern State. Translated by Abbas Mokhber, Agah (In Persian).
    6. Kachouian, H. (2008). Tatavor Goftemanhaye Hoviyati Iran; Irani dar Keshakeshe ba Tajaddod va Ma Ba'd Tajaddod, Tehran: Ney Publications, Third Edition (In Persian).
    7. Kelly, J. M. (2003). A Short History of Western Legal Theory. Translated by Mohammad Rasekh, Tarh-e No (In Persian).
    8. Khatami, M. (2008). Historical Backgrounds of Modernity. Tehran: Elm (In Persian).
    9. Loughlin, M. (2009). Foundations of Public Law, Translated by Mohammad Rasekh, Tehran: Ney (In Persian).
    10. Loughlin, M. (2015). Mabani Hoghogh Omoumi dar Gharb. Translated by Mohammad Moqtader, Tehran: Majd (In Persian).
    11. MacCallum, G. C. (2004). Political Philosophy. Translated by Behrouz Jandaqi, Qom: Taha (In Persian).
    12. Plamenatz, J. (2008). Man and Society. Translated by Kazem Firozmand, Roozaneh (In Persian).
    13. Pooladi, K. (2001). Az Dowlat Eghtedar ta Dowlat Aghl dar Falsafeh Siasi Modern. Tehran: Markaz (In Persian).
    14. Robertson, R. (2001). Globalization: Social Theory and Global Culture. Translated by Kamal Pooladi, Salis (In Persian).
    15. Shojaeizand, A. (2004). Secularization in Christian and Islamic Experience, Baz (In Persian).
    16. Tabatabai, S. J. (2003). Jadal Qadim va Jadid. Negah-e Moaser (In Persian).
    17. Vincent, A. (2002). Theories of the State, Translated by Hossein Bashiriyeh, Fourth Edition, Tehran: Ney (In Persian).

     

    1. B) Articles
    2. Ashraf, A. (1994). Bohran Hoviyat Melli va Qoumi dar Iran. Iran Nameh, (47), 521-550 (In Persian).
    3. Ashraf, A. (2008). Hoviyat Irani be Seh Revayat. Bukhara, (66), 109-127 (In Persian).
    4. Kachouian, H., & Javadi Yeganeh, M. (2005). Tatovor Nazariyehaye Hoviyat dar Gharb; Az Tajaddod ta Ma Ba'd Tajaddod, Nashriyeh Oloum Siasi, Vol. 8, No. 29, Spring, pp. 51-84 (In Persian).
    5. Kachouian, H., & Zaeri, Gh. (2014). Barrasi Tarikhi Chegounegi Tatovor Ma'nayi Mafhoum 'Mellat' az Fahm Dini be Darke Tajaddodi dar Astaneh Nehzat Mashroutiyat. Faslnameh Islam va Motale'at Ejtemaei, 1 (4), 26-54 (In Persian).
    6. Kachouian, H. (2003). Haq Mehvari Tajaddod va Taklif Madari Sonnat. Baztab-e Andisheh, (46), 23-28 (In Persian).
    7. Moradkhani, F. (2018). Mabani va Rishehayeh Shakelgiri Nazariyeh Maslahat Dowlat. Faslnameh Tahqiqat Hoghouqi, (83), 239-259 (In Persian).
    8. Nouzehri, H. A. (2006). Negahi Tahlili be Ravand Tahavvol Mafhoum Hoviyat dar Ghalebha-ye Sehganeh Hoviyat Sonnati, Modern va Post Modern. Faslnameh Motale'at Melli, 7 (2), 127-148 (In Persian).
    9. Nowrouzi, N., & Feyzi, S. (2007). Gozar Dowlat Modern be Democracy Ravand Ejtemaei Shodan Manafe Melli va Siasat Khareji. Rahbord, (44), 167-189 (In Persian).
    10. Tajik, M. (2005). Ensan Modern va Moammaye Hoviyat. Faslnameh Motale'at Melli, 6 (1), 9-28 (In Persian).
Public Law Studies
Volume 56, Issue 2 - Serial Number 46
Summer 2026
Spring 2026
Pages 957-980

  • Receive Date 01 July 2025
  • Revise Date 08 December 2025
  • Accept Date 08 December 2025

Home

Journal Process Ethics

Peer Review Process

Submission

Indexing and Abstracting

Contact Us