Document Type : Article
Authors
1 Prof., Department of Public and International Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran
2 Ph.D. Student in International Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
The State is a legal institution that acts through persons like its organs and representatives. When more than one State or international organization takes part in act that is breach of international duties, the attribution of conduct is of material importance. An International Law Commission drafts on responsibility doesn’t include any express rules as to attribution of conduct in situations like sharing responsibility of international actors. So the main question for this essay is: in sharing responsibility situations, whether the exclusive attribution of wrongful conduct is presumed or multiple attributions of conduct are acceptable. This essay is seeking to clarify and examine rules of attribution of conduct in shared responsibility situations in the light of current rules in international responsibility drafts and through this examine its requirement and consequences
Keywords
1. فارسی
الف) کتاب‌ها
1. ابراهیم گل، علیرضا (1390)، طرح کمیسیون حقوق بین‌الملل در مورد مسئولیت دولت، مسئولیت بین‌المللی دولت متن و شرح مواد کمیسیون حقوق بین‌الملل، چ پنجم، تهران: مؤسسۀ مطالعات و پژوهش‌های شهر دانش.
2. ضیایی بیگدلی، محمدرضا (1398)، حقوق بین‌الملل عمومی، تهران، چ شصت‌وپنجم، تهران: کتابخانۀ گنج دانش.
3. کرافورد، جیمز (1395)، حقوق مسئولیت بین‌المللی، ترجمۀ علیرضا ابراهیم گل، چ اول، تهران: سنگلج قلم.
4. عابدینی، عبداله؛ خلیل، روزگاری (1393)، حقوق مسئولیت سازمان‌های بین‌المللی- ترجمۀ متن و شرح مواد کمیسیون حقوق بین‌الملل سازمان ملل متحد، چ اول، تهران: خرسندی.
ب) مقالات
5. حدادی، مهدی؛ ستایش‌پور، محمد (1397)، «تسهیم مسئولیت بین‌المللی دولت‌ها ناشی از عمل دولت دیگر یا سازمان بین‌المللی، فصلنامۀ دولت پژوهی، ش 14، ص 182-149.
6. زمانی، سید قاسم؛ میرزاده، مناالسادات (1393)، «انتساب اعمال متخلفانۀ اشخاص خصوصی به دولت براساس معیار کنترل: رویۀ دیوان داوری دعاوی ایران- آمریکا»، مجلۀ پژوهش حقوق عمومی، ش 43، ص 108-81.
7. -------------------------------- (1392)، «مسئولیت بین‌المللی دولت‌ها در قبال اعمال شرکت‌های خصوصی از منظر رویۀ قضایی و داوری بین‌المللی»، مجلۀ پژوهش حقوق عمومی، ش 40، ص 140-115.
8. زمانی، سید قاسم؛ ضیایی، یاسر (1390)، «تعمیم نظام مسئولیت بین‌المللی به بازیگران غیردولتی با تأکید بر جدایی‌طلبان»، مجلۀ حقوقی بین‌المللی، ش 45، ص 84-53.
9. زمانی، سید قاسم (1395)، «واگرایی و همگرایی «مسئولیت کیفری فرد» و «مسئولیت بین‌المللی دولت: تأملی در اوراق پروندة جنگ شیمیایی عراق علیه ایران»، فصلنامۀ پژوهش حقوق عمومی، ش 51، ص 27-9.
10. صلح‌چی، محمدعلی (1393)، «مسئولیت دولت در قبال نقض حقوق بین‌الملل بشر توسط شرکت‌های فراملی»، فصلنامۀ پژوهش حقوق عمومی، ش 44، ص 128-105.
11. ملکی‌زاده، امیرحسین (1391)، «تحلیل مفهوم قابلیت انتساب مسئولیت بین‌المللی در رویه دیوان بین‌المللی دادگستری»، فصلنامة راهبرد، ش 64، ص 292-249.
12. مؤمنی راد، احمد؛ ستایش‌پور، محمد (1398)، «دامنة مفهومی مسئولیت اشتقاقی سازمان‌های بین‌المللی در حقوق بین‌الملل»، فصلنامه مطالعات حقوق عمومی، ش 3، ص 655-635.
13. عسگری، پوریا (1388)، «مسئولیت بین‌المللی افراد و دولت‌ها در پرتو ضابطۀ کنترل»، مجلۀ حقوق بین‌الملل، ش 40، ص 161-149.
2. انگلیسی
A) Books
1. Crawford, James & Alain Pellet& Simon Olleson (eds.), (2010), The Law of International Responsibility, Oxford: OUP.
2. Crawford, James, (2002), The International Law Commission"s Articles on State Responsibility, Cambridge University Press, n. 2.
3. Crawford, James, (2014), State responsibility: General Part, UK, Cambridge University Press.
4. Crawford, James, State Responsibility- The general part, translated by Ebrahimgol, Alireza, (1395), 1st ed., Tehran, Sanglaj Pob (In Persian).
5. Lanovoy, Vladyslav, (2016), "Complicity and its Limits in the Law of International Responsibility", Hart publishing.
6. May, Larry, sharing responsibility, (1992) , the Chicago University Press.
7. Nollkaemper, Andre, and Plakokefalos, Ilias, (2014), Principle of shared responsibility in international law: An appraisal of the state of the art, Cambridge University Press.
8. The Draft Articles on responsibility of international organizations for internationally wrongful acts with Commentaries 2011,translated by Abedini, Abdollah, (1393), 1st ed, Tehran, Khorsandi Pub (In Persian).
9. The Draft Articles on responsibility of states for internationally wrongful acts with Commentaries 2001, translated by Ebrahimgol, Alireza, (1390), Ed.5, Tehran, Shahredanesh Pub (In Persian).
10. Ziai Bigdeli, Mohammadreza, (1398), Public International Law, Ed 65, Tehran, Ganjedanesh Pub (In Persian).
B) Articles
11. Amoroso, Daniele, (2011) "Moving Towards Complicity As A Criteria of Attribution of Private Conducts: Imputation to States of Corporate Abuses in the US Case Law", Imputation to States of Corporate Abuses in the US Case Law’, Cambridge University Press.
12. Asgary, Pouria, "International Responsibility of Individuals and States in light of the Control Criteria", International Law Review, Volume 26, Issue 40, Winter and Spring 2009, Pages 149-161 (In Persian).
13. D’Aspremont, Jean and Andre´ NollkaemperI and lias Plakokefalos and Cedric Ryngaert, (2015), 'Sharing Responsibility Between Non-State Actors and States in International Law: Introduction', Neth Int Law Rev, available athttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40802-015-0015-0, visited in 2020/10/07.
14. Fry, James, (2007), "coercion, causation, and the fictional elements of indirect responsibility", Vanderbilt journal of transnational Law, Vol 40.
15. Fry, James, (2014), "Attribution of Responsibility", SHARES Research Paper 37 , available at www.sharesproject.nl.
16. Graefrath, Bernhard, (1996), "complicity in the law of international responsibility", Revuebelge de Droit in international, Éditions Bruylant , Bruxelles http://rbdi.bruylant.be/public/modele/rbdi/content/fileslGraefrath.pdf/ visited in 2020/10/07.
17. Haddadi, Medi & Setayeshpour, Mohammad, (1397), "The allocation of state responsibility arising from the act of another state or international organizations", Dolatpajoohi Quarterly, No.14, pp.149-182 (In Persian).
18. Kuijper, Pieter J. (2010). "Introduction: Attributed or Direct Responsibility or Both?" International Organizations Law Review, vol. 7.
19. Lanovoy, Vladyslav, (2014), “complicity in an internationally wrongful act”, available at www.sharesproject.nl: last visited in 2020/10/07
20. Maleki zadeh, Amir Hossien, (1391), "The Analysis of conception of attribution of international responsibility in jurisprudence of international court of Justice, Scientific Research Journal of Rahbord, No.64, pages 249-292 (In Persian).
21. Messineo, Francesco, (2012), "Multiple attribution of conduct", available at www.sharesproject.nl last visited in 2020/10/07.
22. Momenirad, Ahmad, Setayeshpur, Mohammad, "Conceptual Framework of Derivative Responsibility of International Organizations in International Law", Public Law Research, Volume 49, Issue 3, Autumn 2019, Pages 635-655 (In Persian).
23. Murray, Odette, (2011), "Piercing the Corporate Veil: The Responsibility of Member states of an International Organization", International organizations law review, Vol 8, Issue 2.
24. Nollkaemper, Andre, (2011), "issues of shared responsibility before the international court of justice", Amesterdam law school legal studies research paper, available at www.sharesproject.nl, last visited in 2020/10/07.
25. Nollkaemper,A and Dov Jacobs , (2013), "Shared Responsibility in International Law: A Conceptual Framework", Michigan Journal of International Law, Volume 34.
26. Noyes, J. E, and Smith, B. D, (1998), "state responsibility and the principle of joint and several liability", 13 Yale Journal of International law.
27. Solh Chi, Mohammad Ali, "State Responsibility for Violation of Human Rights by Transnational Corporations, Public Law Research", Volume 16, Issue 44, Winter 2015, Pages 105-128 (In Persian).
28. Talmon, Stefan, (2007), "A plurality of responsible actors: international responsibility for acts of the coalition provisional authority in Iraq", University of Oxford Faculty of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series, Working Paper No 25.
29. Zamani, Seyed Ghasem & Mirzadeh, Mona Sadat, (1392), "International Responsibility of States for Private Company’s Conduct Thorough the Lens of International Judicial and Arbitral Jurisprudence", Public Law Research, Volume 15, Issue 40, Summer 2013, Pages 115-140 (In Persian).
30. Zamani, Seyed Ghasem & Mirzadeh, Mona Sadat, (1393), "Attribution of Private-Persons’ Wrongful Acts to a State: Standard of Control in Jurisprudence of Iran-U.S Claims Tribunal", Public Law Research, Volume 16, Issue 43, Winter 2015, Pages 81-108 (In Persian).
31. Zamani, Seyed Ghasem & Ziaee, Seyed Yasser, "Extension of International Responsibility Regime to Non-State Actors with Emphasis on Secessionists", International Law Review, Volume 28, Issue 45, Winter and Spring 2012, Pages 53-83 (In Persian).
32. Zamani, Seyed Ghasem , "Convergence and divergence of Individual criminal responsibility and international responsibility of States for wrongful acts: Taking a Look at Iran- Iraq War Case (1980)", Public Law Research, Volume 18, Issue 51, Autumn 2016, Pages 9-29 (In Persian).
C) Cases
33. Difference Relating to Immunity from Legal Process of a Special Rapporteur of the Commission of Human Rights, Advisory Opinion, ICJ Reports, 1999.
34. Certain Phosphate Lands in Nauru, (Nauru/Australia), ICJ Reports, 1992.
35. Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against - Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America), ICJ Reports, 1986.
36. Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro), ICJ Reports, 2007.
37. Prosecutor v. Tadić, Judgment, ICTY Case No. IT-94–1-A, 15 July 1999
38. Eurotunnel Arbiration, 2007, 132 ILR 1, https://jusmundi.com/en/ last seen: 2020/7/4.
39. Bosphorus Hava Yollari Turizm Ve Ticaret Anonim Şirketi v. Ireland, No. 45036/98 , ECtHR, 30 June 2005.
40. Behrami v. France and Saramati v. France, Germany and Norway (Admissibility) (GC), ECtHR, n. 71412/01 and 78166/01, 2 May 2007.
41. Hess v. United Kingdom, ECHR, n. 6231/73, 28 May 1975.
42. Kadi and Al Barakaat International Foundation v. Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities, European Court of Justice, joined cases C-402/05 P and C-415/05 P, [2008] 3 CMLR 41 (Kadi): 75–76, 266.
43. European Court of Justice, joined Drozd and Janousek v. France and Spain, n.12747/87.26 June 1992, 14 EHRR A/CN.4/610 (2009), 13l cases C-402/05 P and C-415/05 P, [2008] 3 CMLR 41.
44. Al-Saadoon and Mufdhi v. the United Kingdom (Merits) (Fourth section), March 2010, EHRR 9.
45. Al-Jedda v. UK, 2011, ECtHR 27021/08.
46. Attorney- General v. Nissan, 1969, UKHL 3.
D) Document
47. Ago, Roberto, Third Report on State responsibility, A/CN.4/246 and Add.1-3, 1971, vol. II(1).
48. J. Crawford, Third Report ILC Ybk 2000/II(1).
49. Gaja, Giorgio, Seventh report on responsibility of international organizations.
50. ILC Ybk 1971/ II (1), 264.
)