The “Ijtihadi” Interpretation Theory and its Place in Interpreting the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran

Habibzadeh, Tavakkol; Bahadori Jahromi, Mohammad; Asghari Shoorestani, Mohammadreza

doi:10.22059/jplsq.2020.291831.2219

Document Type : Article

Authors

¹ Associate Prof., Department of Public Law, Imam Sadiq University, Tehran, Iran

² Assistant Prof., Department of Public Law, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

³ Assistant Prof., Department of Public Law, University of Judicial Sciences and Administrative Services, Tehran, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22059/jplsq.2020.291831.2219

Abstract

The process of interpretation needs an interpretive theory more than it needs methods and schools of interpretation. A theory that responds well to the essential question of the nature of interpretation and legitimizes the interpretation provided by the interpreter. This paper, using a descriptive-analytical approach and utilizing library resources, attempts to respond to the question of what constitutes the correct interpretive theory and what its elements are. For this purpose, it will introduce the “ijtihadi” (scholarly effort) interpretation theory. This theory considers interpretation as part of the legal system and its response to the issue at hand. Furthermore, considering the two important pillars of any legal system namely the principles and goals of the system, this theory believes that correct interpretation is an interpretation that from an existential point of view is based on the foundations of the legal system and from a functional point of view fulfills the objectives of the legal system.

Keywords

References

English
1. انگلیسی
2. A) Book
3. Brodbeck, May (1969), Reading in the philosophy of the social sciences, library of congress catalog, fourth edition.
4. Land, K. C. (1971), "Formal Theory" In H. L. Costner (ed.), Sociological Methodology, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass,pp. 175-220
1. B) Article
2. Balkin, Jack. M (2013), “The New Originalism and the uses of history”, Fordham Law Review, Vol. 82.
3. Lindhal, Hans (2003), “Dialectic and Revolution: Confronting Kelsen and Gadamer on Legal Interpretation” Cardozo Law Review, Vol. 24, pp. 769.
4. Mitrophanous, Eleni (1997), Soft Positivism, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 17, Issue 4, pp. 621–641.
5. Stone Sweet, Alec (2003), “Why Europe Rejected American Judicial Review and why it May Not Matter”, Michigan Law Review, Yale Law School Faculty Scholarship, pp.2744-2780
Refrences In Persian:
1. A) Book
2. Alwsa, Sadmhmwd (1415), rwh alm'eana fa tfsar alqran al'ezam, thqaq 'ela 'ebdalbara' 'etaۀ, barwt: daralketb al'elma (In Arabic).
3. Bhshta, Mhmdhsan (1390), Mbana Nzra Qanwn Asasa, Tehran: Bnaad Nshr Athar w Andashh‌haa shhad bhshta, cheape cheharm (In Persian).
4. Blakea, Nwrmn (1395), Traha pejewhsh‌haa ajtma'ea, trjmh hsn cheawshaan, Tehran: na, cheape dhm (In Persian).
5. Chealmrz, Aln f (1374), 'elm cheast, nzraat tazh‌aa drbarh flsfh 'elwm pewper, kewhn, lakeatws, faarabnd, trjmh mhmd mshaakha, Tehran: antshar, cheape dwm (In Persian).
6. Dansh‌pejewh, Mostfa (1389), mqdmh 'elm hqwq, qm: pejewhshguah hwzh w danshguah, cheape dwm (In Persian).
7. Eamla, Mhmd bn mkea (shhad awl) (ba‌ta), alqwa'ed w alfwa'ed, thqaq sad 'ebdalhada hkeam, qm: mfad (In Arabic).
8. Eladwst, Abwalqasm (1396), fqh w 'eql, thran: pejewhshguah frhngu w andashh aslama, cheape hftm (In Persian).
9. Hafz‌naa, Mhmdrda (1384), Mqdmh‌aa br rwsh thqaq dr 'elwm ansana, Tehran: smt, cheape aazdhm (In Persian).
10. Hkemt‌naa, Mhmwd w mhda m'ela w sadmhmdhsan keazmana (1394), dramda br nzrah hqwqa aslam, mjmw'eh mqalat kengurh ban‌almlla 'elwm ansana aslama, dwrh awl, shmarh 5, ss 496-449 (In Persian).
11. Hsana Sharaza, Mhmd (1421), alwsa'el ala alrsa'el, qm: 'eashwra, cheape dwm (In Arabic).
12. Jawad, Mhmdjwad (1391), Rwsh thqaq dr 'elm hqwq bh zban sadh, Tehran: mkhatb (In Persian).
13. j'efry lngurwdy, mhmd j'efr (1368), trmynwlwjey hqwq, Tehran: gunj dansh, cheape cheharm (In Persian).
14. Keatwzaan, Nasr (1385), Mqdmh 'elm hqwq w mtal'eh dr nzam hqwqa aaran, thran: antshar, cheape chehl w nhm (In Persian).
15. Mhrpewr, Hasan (1389), mkhtsr qanwn asasy jmhwry aslamy ayran, Tehran: dadgustr (In Persian).
16. Mntskeaw, Sharl dw (1392), rwh‌alqwanan, jld awl, trjmh 'ela akebr mhtda, thran: amarkebar (In Persian).
17. Mntzra, hsan'ela (1409), drasat fa wlaaۀ alfqah w fqh aldwlۀ alaslamaۀ, qm: tfker, cheape dwm (In Arabic).
18. Montzri, hsan'ela (1415), drasat fi almkeaseb almhrm, qm: tfker (In Arabic).
19. Mstfwa, hsn (1360), Althqaq fa kelmat alqran alkeram, thran: bnguah trjmh w nshr ketab (In Arabic).
20. Mthra, Mrtda (1386), Mjmw'eh athar (j 21: aslam w naazhaa zman), thran: sdra, cheape cheharm (In Persian).
21. Nadra, 'ezt‌allh w saf Nraqa, Mram (1364), Rwsh‌haa thqaq dr 'elwm ansana ba takead br 'elwm trbata, Tehran: mhart, cheape dwm (In Persian).
22. Nakewnhad, Hamd (1397), dnbalh nanwshth aswl nwshth qanwn asasa؛ nguaha thlala bh peadaash, a'etbar w msadaq rwah‌haa asasa dr tjrbh hqwq asasa jmhwra aslama aaran, mjmw'eh mqalat nkhstan hmaash mla aswl nanwshth qanwn asasa, ss 419-399 (In Persian).
23. Pewper, Kearl (1370), Mntq aketshaf 'elma, Trjmh ahmd aram, Tehran: srwsh, cheape awl (In Persian).
24. Rfa'e‌pewr, Faramarz (1360), kendwkeawha w pendashth‌ha: mqdmh‌aa br rwsh‌haa shnakht jam'eh w thqaqat ajtma'ea, Tehran: antshar (In Persian).
25. San'ea, Perwaz (1389), hqwq w ajtma'e, thran: trh nw, cheape dwm (In Persian).
26. Swrt Mshrwh Mdakerat mjls brrsy nhayy qanwn asasy (1364), Tehran: Adarh kel amwr frhnguy w rwabt 'emwmy mjls shwary aslamy (In Persian).
27. Tbatbaaa, Sadmhmdhsan (1417), Almazan fa tfsar alqran, qm: dftr antsharat aslama, cheape penjm (In Arabic).
1. B) Article
2. Jhan‌ban, Sad'ebadallh & gurja azndraana, 'ela‌akebr (1398), cheasta hnjar dr saht nzm ajtma'ea w nzm hqwqa, mtal'eat hqwq 'emwma, dwrh 49, shmarh 3, ss 800-777 (In Persian).
3. Keastalawn, Daraw (1384), nzrah saasa qanwn asasa, trjmh ms'ewd keakeawnd, hqwq asasa, sal swm, shmarh penjm, ss 336-311 (In Persian).
4. Keatwzyan, Nasr (1383), «aswl mntqy hakem br tfsyr qanwn asasy», hqwq asasy, sal dwm,‏ shmarh swm, ss 308-302 (In Persian).
5. kedkhdaaa, 'ebas'ela w bhadra jhrma, Mohamad (1397), drwrt tfsar qanwn asasa dr pertw wajegua‌haa aan qanwn, mtal'eat hqwq 'emwma, dwrh 48, shmarh 1, ss 21-1 (In Persian).
6. ke'eba,‌ 'ebas,‌ asghra shwrstana, mhmdrda w asl z'eam, amarhsan, nqsh mqdmh qanwn asasa dr tfsar aswl w shnakht ahdaf w rsalt‌haa qanwn asasa jmhwra aslama aaran, dansh hqwq 'emwma, sal swm, shmarh 10, ss 20-1 (In Persian).
7. Mhmwdy, jwad (1384), tamly br ray tfsyry shwray nguhban drbarh slahyt‌hay dywan 'edalt adary, hqwq asasy, sal swm, shmarh penjm, ss 405-387 (In Persian).
8. Pearsanaa, Hmad (1388), Rwsh‌shnasa 'elwm ansana ba rwakerd aslama, 'eaar pejewhsh dr 'elwm ansana, shmarh 2, ss 54-39 (In Persian).
9. Perwan, Kharalh (1392), az qanwn asasa 'erfa ta 'erf hqwq asasa, mtal'eat hqwq 'emwma, dwrh 43, shmarh 2, ss 99-79 (In Persian).
1. C) Thesis
2. Bhadry jahromy, Mhmd (1394), Baasth‌haa tfsar qanwn asasa jmhwra aslama aaran br mbnaa mfhwm w kearkerd tfsar dr nzam hqwq asasa, rsalh dwrh dketra hqwq 'emwma, danshguah thran (perdas faraba) (In Persian).
1. D) Reports
2. khlf‌rdaaa, Hasan & Mnswraan, mostafa (1393), mkeatb w rwakerdhaa tfsar qanwn asasa, guzarsh pejewhsha shmarh 13930024 pejewhshkedh shwraa nguhban, qabl dstrsa dr adrs: https://b2n.ir/makateb (In Persian).

Public Law Studies Quarterly

The “Ijtihadi” Interpretation Theory and its Place in Interpreting the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran

References

References

Volume 52, Issue 3
Autumn 2022
October 2022
Pages 1205-1225

The “Ijtihadi” Interpretation Theory and its Place in Interpreting the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran

References

References

Volume 52, Issue 3Autumn 2022October 2022Pages 1205-1225

Volume 52, Issue 3
Autumn 2022
October 2022
Pages 1205-1225