Document Type : Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. Candidate of International Law, Department of International Law, Faculty of Law, Islamic Azad University, Tehran Central Branch, Tehran, Iran

2 Associate professor, Department of International Law, Faculty of Law, Islamic Azad University, Tehran Central Branch, Tehran, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Department of International Law, Faculty of Law, Islamic Azad University, Tehran Central Branch, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

One of the important issues in the Statute of the International Criminal Court is the jurisdiction of the Court, which has been challenged since the Rome Conference and has caused many debates. This id exemplified by the debate over the preconditions of applying the Court's jurisdiction to international crimes subject to its statute. The possibility of extending the jurisdiction of the Court to nationals of non-member States has always been raised by those in favor of the Court's comprehensive jurisdiction, and an attempt is made to grant such a capacity to the Court by broadly interpreting the preconditions to exercising the Court's jurisdiction. The present paper, by examining the views of the proponents and opponents of this issue, seeks to answer whether it is possible to exercise jurisdiction over the nationals of non-member states within the framework of the principles of international law. Using a descriptive-analytical method, we come to the conclusion that not only the rules of international law do not allow this, but also the normative order of the international community does not tolerate such an evolution.

Keywords

  1. English

    1. A) Books
    2. Jeffrey L., & Dunoff, Et Al. (2010). International Law Norms, Actors, and Process: A Problem-Oriented Approach.Aspen Law & Business, 3rd Ed.
    3. Schabas, W. A. (2010). the International Criminal Court: A Commentary in the Rome Statute. Oxford University Press.1st Edition.
    4. Stahn, C. (2014). the Law and Practice of the International Criminal Court. Oxford University Press, 1st Edition.
    5. Vagias, M. (2014). the Territorial Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court. Cambridge University Press, 1st Edition.

     

    1. B) Articles
    2. Akande, D., (2003). the Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court over Nationals of Non-Parties: Legal Basis and Limits. 1 J. INT’LCRIM. JUST, 618-650 .
    3. Curtis, A., Bradley & Mitu, G. (2010). Withdrawing from International Custom. 120 YALE LAW J'OURNAL, 202-275.
    4. Kirsch Philippe, Holmes, J. T. (1999). The Rome Conference on an International Criminal Court the Negotiating Process. The American Journal of International Law, 93(1), 2-12.
    5. Kochler, H., & Justice and Realpolitik, (2017). The Predicament of the International Criminal Court. Chinese Journal of International Law, 16(1), 1-9.
    6. Morris, M. (2000). The Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court over Nationals of Non-Party States. ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law, 6, 363-369.
    7. Rudolph, C.(2016). Power, Principle, and Pragmatism: The ICC and the Politics of Prosecutorial Strategy. paper presented at Western Political Science Association Meeting, March 24-26, San Diego, CA.
    8. Scharf, M. P. (2001). The ICC's Jurisdiction Over the Nationals of Non-Party States: A Critique of the U.S. Position. Law and Contemporary Problems, 64(1), 67-117.
    9. Sekulow, Jay A., and Ash, Robert W.(2020). The Issue of ICC Jurisdiction Over Nationals of Non-Consenting, Non-Party States to the Rome Statute.South Carolina Journal of International Law and Business, 16(2), 1-66.

     

    1. C) Websites
    2. Status of US Bilateral Immunity Agreements (BIAs), available at: http://goodtimesweb.org/diplomacy/2015/CICCFS_BIAstatus_current.pdf
    3. Universal Jurisdiction: A preliminary Survey of Legislation around the World, Amnesty International Publications, 9 Oct. 2012, available at: https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/ior53/019/2012/en/

     

    1. D) Document
    2. ICC-OTP, Report on Preliminary Examination Activities, 2015
    3. International Court of Justice (ICJ), North Sea Continental Shelf Case (Ger. /Den.), Judgment, 1969.
    4. Fatou Bensouda, 2014, "Statement of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court", The Public Deserves to know the Truth about the ICC’s Jurisdiction over Palestine.
    5. Reason for the Oral Decision on the Motion Challenging the Admissibility of the Case, 16 June 2009, the Prosecutor v. Germain Katanga and Mathieu Chui, Situation in the Democratic Republic of Congo, ICC-01/04-01/07
    6. Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of its Eighteenth Session, (1996), Draft Articles on the Law of Treaties with Commentaries, II Tearbook of the Int’l L. Comm’n, (Commentary to Draft Art. 30: “General Rule Regarding Third States”)
    7. Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, adopted in 1998
    8. "Situation in the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan", (Request for authorization of an investigation pursuant to Article 15), 20 November 2017, Office of the Prosecutor, Case No ICC-02/17-7-RED, (‘Prosecutor Request for Authorization of an Investigation’). Available at: https://www.icc-cpi.int/Pages/record.aspx?docNo=ICC-02/17-7-Red
    9. Situation in the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan (Decision Pursuant to Article 15 of the Rome Statute on the Authorization of an Investigation into the Situation in the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan), 12 April 2019, ICC, Pre-Trial Chamber II, Case No ICC-02/17, Available at: https://www.icc-cpi.int/Pages/record.aspx?docNo=ICC-02/17-62
    10. Situation in the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan (Judgment on the Appeal against the Decision on the Authorization of an Investigation into the Situation in the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan), 5 March 2020, ICC, Appeals Chamber, Case No ICC-02/17 OA4, available at: https://www.icc-cpi.int/CourtRecords/CR2020_00828.PDF
    11. Status of Palestine in the United Nations, United Nations General Assembly resolution 67/19, 44the Plenary Meeting, 29 Nov 2012, A/RES/67/19.
    12. Status of Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, UNITED NATIONS (Feb. 2, 2020), available at: https://treaties.un.org/Pages /ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=XVIII-10&chapter=18&clang=_en
    13. Statute of the Special Court for Sierra Leone, 14 August 2000, available at: http://www.rscsl.org/Documents/scsl-statute.pdf
    14. The Warrant of Arrest of the Special Court for Sierra Leone for Charles Taylor, 12 June 2003, available at: http://www.rscsl.org/Documents /Decisions/Taylor/006/SCSL-03-01-I-004.pdf
    15. The Charter of the International Military Tribunal, 8 August 1945, available at: https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/documents/atrocity-crimes/Doc.2_Charter%20of%20IMT%201945.pdf
    16. Warrant of Arrest for Omar Hassan Ahmad Al Bashir, 4 March 2009, Pre-Trial Chamber I, ICC-02/05-01/09-1

     

    References in Persian:

    1. A) Books
    2. Falsafi, H., (2012). International Law of Treaties. 3rd Edition, Farhange Nashre Nou, Tehran: Islamic Penal Code, 2013 (In Persian).
    3. Zamani and Mahnaz Bahramlou, Shahre Danesh Intatute for Studies and Research, Tehran, Iran (In Persian).

     

    1. B) Articles
    2. Aghaei Janat Makan, H. (2006). Jurisdiction of the ICC over Nationals of non-party states: legal Basis and Limitations. Journal of Legal Research, 43, 465-520 (In Persian).
    3. Alhoyi Nazari, H. (2015). Treaties Establishing Right for Third States: An Approach of Article 36 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. Journal of Legal Research, 54, 167-190 (In Persian).
    4. Beigzade, E., & Abdolahi, M. A. (2017). The Balance of Ideal of Criminal Justice and Legal Standards of Application of the Jurisdiction of the ICC Over Nationals of Non-party States, Journal of Legal Research, 84, 11-42 (In Persian).
    5. Deihim, A. (2000). Universal Jurisdiction and International Criminal Court. Journal of Events and Analysis, 138, 62-72 (In Persian).
    6. Pourbaferani, H. (2015). The basis and Developments of the Prinicple of Nationality. Research of Criminal Law Magazine, 17, 9-30 (In Persian).
    7. Salehi. J. (2021). Extending the ICC Jurisdiction in the Myanmar Situation. Iranian Research Letter of International Politics, 1, 205-225 (In Persian).
    8. Salimi, S. (2020). ICC Restrictions Regarding its Activation of Jurisdiction over Crime of Aggression. Studies of Public Law Quarterly, 69, 67-90 (In Persian).
    9. Salimi, S. (2021). Meaning of the “Interests of Justice” in ICC and the Competent Authority to Establish it in the light of Afghanistan Situation, Research Journal of Criminal Law, 1, 75-98 (In Persian).
    10. Shariat Bagheri, J. (2002). Jurisdiction of International Criminal Court: Divergent Opinions regarding Preconditions of Application of Jurisdiction. Journal Legal Views, 26, 25-57 (In Persian).
    11. Shariat Bagheri, J., (1998). A Look on the Statute of the ICC. Journal of Legal Views, 12, 77-109 (In Persian).
    12. Seyed Zade Sani, M., & Tahan Toroqi, M. (2021). The US opisition to the ICC in the Situation of Afganistan. Iranian Research Letter of International Politics, 1, 177-204 (In Persian).