Public Law Studies Quarterly

Current Issue

By Issue

By Author

Author Index

Keyword Index

Journal About

Editorial Board

Journal Aim Scope

News

Journal FAQ

Journal Links

Guide for Authors

Author Guidelines for Manuscript Submission

Reviewers List

Invoking National Security in International Legal Practice

Document Type : Article

Authors

1 Prof., Department of Public Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran, ‎Tehran, Iran

2 MA. in International Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran‎

Abstract

Since the 1980s, due to the emergence of complex threats and the increasingly intertwined relationship of internal and external issues, the concept of national security has become common in international parlence. In such a situation, the need to address the concept of national security, which became a universal concept, was an essential step from the perspective of international law. The International Court of Justice (ICJ) began the process with three judgments issued in the Nicaragua case in 1986, and the Nuclear Weapons case in 1996, and the Oil Platforms case in 2003, which introduced national security concepts such as "fundamental interests, vital interests, and emergencies" into the international law literature. The first manifestations of this practice appeared in international human rights law and then international  disarmament law in the form of treaty terms. By analyzing the above-mentioned views, practices and sources, this paper will examine the formation of a "national security regime" in international law. A coherent and basic regime of specific rules and norms on national security, which is developing.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. English

    1. A) Books
    2. Mijalkovic, HYPERLINK "https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Sasa-Mijalkovic" S.,  &   HYPERLINK "https://www.researchgate.net/scientific-contributions/Dusan-Blagojevic-2090276065"  Dusan,   B. (2014). The Basis Of National Security In International Law. Journal of Criminology and Law, 1, 49-68: https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0354-8872/2014/0354-88721401049M.pdf
    3. Puchala, D. J., & Raymond F. Hopkins. (1982). International Regimes: Lessons from Inductive Analysis. Journal of International Organization, 36(2), 245-275: https:// works.swarthmore .edu/cgi/viewcon tent.cgi?article = 1169&context =fac-poli-sci
    4. Rose-ackerman , n and Billa Benjamin, “Treaties and National Security”, Yale Law School Faculty Scholarship Serie”, (2008) pp10-25 <http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers Part of the Law Commons%0ARecommended>
    5. Scheppele, K. L. (2010). The International Standardisation OF National Security Law. The Journal of National Security Law and Policy, 4, 437-453: https://jnslp.com/topics/read/vol-4-no-2/
    6. Stephen P. Mulligan, Withdrawal from International Agreements: Legal Framework, the Paris Agreement, and the Iran Nuclear Agreement, May 4, 2018, Congressional Research Service: https://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/R44761.pdf

     

    1. B) Articles
    2. Greenwood, T. & Haffa Jr. , Robert (1981). Supply-Side Non Proliferation. Foreign Policy . 42, 125-140.

     

    1. C) Convention
    2. Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment(OHCHR), (1984): https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/cat.aspx
    3. Statute of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR). (2015): <https://ijrcenter.org/2015/08/17 /iachr-report-highlights-human-rights-violations-at guantanamo-and-urges-closure/>

     

    1. D) Cases
    2. ADDIN CSL_CITATION {"citationItems":[{"id":"ITEM-1","itemData":{"author":[{"dropping-particle":"","family":"JUSTICE","given":"INTERNATIONAL COURT OF","non-dropping-particle":"","parse-names":false,"suffix":""}],"id":"ITEM-1","issued":{"date-parts":[["1962"]]},"publisher-place":"vienna","title":"Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited (Belgium v. Spain) (New Application","type":"legal_case"},"uris":["http://www.mendeley.com/documents/?uuid=aed07ebc-7687-41d9-bb24-e1310959ad7c"]}],"mendeley":{"formattedCitation":"Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited (Belgium v Spain) (New Application.","plainTextFormattedCitation":"Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited (Belgium v Spain) (New Application.","previouslyFormattedCitation":"Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited (Belgium v Spain) (New Application."},"properties":{"noteIndex":379},"schema":"https://github.com/citation-style-language/schema/raw/master/csl-citation.json"} Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limite, 50 (ICJ rep, February 5, 1970 1962): https://www.icj-cij.org/en/case/50
    3. Alleged Violations of the 1955 Treaty of Amity, Economic Relations, and Consular Rights, 175 (ICJ rep, July 21, 2021): https://www.icj-cij.org/en/case/175
    4. Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and montenegro), (ICJ rep, 26 February 2007). https://www.icj-cij.org/en/case/91
    5. Case Concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, (Croatia v. Serbia), 118 )ICJ rep, 18 November 2008): https://www.icj-cij.org/en/case/118
    6. Case Concerning Oil Platform, 90 (ICJ rep, june 11, 2003): https://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/90/090-20031106-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf>
    7. Delimitation of the maritime boundary between Guinea-Bissau v.senegal (Arbitral tribonal February 14, 1985): https://legal.un.org/docs/?path=../riaa/cases/vol_XX/119-213.pdf&lang=O
    8. HYPERLINK "https://www.icj-cij.org/public/files/case-related/90/8632.pdf" \t "_blank" Counter-Memorial and Counter-claim submitted by the United States of America , 90 (ICJ june 23, 1997): https://www.icj-cij.org/public/files/case-related/90/8632.pdf
    9. Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, 226 (ICJ Advisery Opinion 8 july, 1996): https://www.icj-cij.org/public/files/case-related/95/095-19960708-ADV-01-00-EN.pdf
    10. Medellín v. Texas, 552 U.S. 491 , ( HYPERLINK "https://supreme.justia.com/" US Supreme Court  March 25, 2008): https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/552/491/
    11. Memorial sabmited Islamic Republic Of IRAN, 90 (ICJ rep, june 8, 1993): https://www.icj-cij.org/public/files/case-related/90/8622.pdf
    12. Militarv and Puramilitary Activities in und aguinst Nicaragua, 70 (ICJrep, june 27, 1986): https://www.icj-cij.org/en/case/70
    13. Prosecutor v Dusko Tadic a/k/a ‘DULE’, IT-94-1-AR (ICTY rep, oct. 2, 1995): https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/2396930
    14. The Case Of SS LOTUS, serise A (CIJ rep, ,1927): <https://www.icj-cij.org/files/permanent-court-of-internationaljustice/serie_A/A_10/30_Lotus_Arret.pdf>.

     

    1. E) Ducument, Lecture and Resolutions
    2. General Assembly, Ronald Reagan addresses the UN General Assembly 40th Annual Meeting. (Oct. 24, 1985). A Foundation for Enduring Peace. new york: https://www.c-span.org/video/?125753-1/40th-general-assembly
    3. United state senate, report on the u.s. intelligence community’s prewar intelligence assessment on Iraq, (july. 7, 2004): http://fas.org/irp/congress/2004_rpt/ssci_iraq.pdf
    4. USA Congress, the Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act (2015), Public Law 114–17, 114th Congress: https://www.congress.gov/114/plaws/publ17/PLAW-114publ17.pdf
    5. United Nations General Assembly. A/RES/49/75 (1996): un.org: https://undocs.org/en/A/RES/49/75
    6. United Nations Security Council, S/RES/1696 (1969): un.org: https://undocs.org/S/RES/1696(2006)

     

    References in Persian:

    1. A) Books
    2. Alhoei, H. N. (2015). Systemic Relations Article 15 of the UN Charter. Public Law Studies (In Persian).
    3. Black, C.. Henry. (1986). Blacks Law Dictionary (4th Ed). (M. ST. PAUL) Oxford, West Publishin CO: https://karnatakajudiciary.kar.nic .in/hcklibrary/ PDF/Blacks%20Law%206th%20Edition%20-%20SecA.pdf.
    4. Brisk, E. (2011). Human Rights and National Insecurity, National Security and Human Rights. translated by Siamak Rah-Peik, Tehran: Institute for Strategic Studies (In Persian).
    5. Doherty, J., & Faltzgraf, R. (2005). Conflicting Theories in International Relations. translated by Vahid Tayeb and Alireza Bozorgi, Tehran: Qoms (In Persian).
    6. Griffiths, M., & Oklagan, T. (2009). Key Concepts of International Relations. translated by Mohammad Amjad, Tehran: mizan (In Persian).
    7. Joyner, Daniel H. (2016). Iran’s nuclear program and international law, New York : Oxford University Press: http://lccn.loc.gov/2016011939.
    8. Kok Dine, N. (2003). Public International Law. Hasan Habibi, Tehran: Information (In Persian).
    9. Musaizadeh, R. (2010). Law of International Organizations. Law of the Security Council, Tehran: mizan (In Persian).
    10. Sadat Maidani, S. H., & Naziri, M. (2013). Suspension of Iran's nuclear rights by the Security Council in the Critique of International Law, the International Community and International Law in the 21st Century, Tehran: Institute of Legal Studies and Research (In Persian).

     

    1. B) Articles
    2. Abdullahi, M. (2014). Approaches of the International Liability System in Compensation for Damages Due to Non-Prohibited Acts in International Law. Journal of Legal Research, 56, 211-278: https://www.sid.ir/fa/journal/ViewPaper.aspx? id = 163126 (In Persian).
    3. Ahmadian, A. A. (2015). Explaining the relationship between types of intrusion and their relationship with the four-spectrum threat system. National Security Studies Quarterly, 18, 61-97: https://ps.ihu.ac.ir/article_200497_50bc4ca67d7c00d54b5b7ae1135dde3e.pdf (In Persian).
    4. Asgarkhani, A. M. (2002). Capacity of International Regimes. Journal of Political Studies, Faculty of Law and Political Science, 57, 179-216: https://jflps.ut.ac.ir/article_11098.html (In Persian).
    5. Fazaeli, M., & Satayeshpour, M. (2020). Static Interpretation of the International Court of Justice in Taking Responsibility for Genocide - An Analysis of the Croatian Case against Serbia. Quarterly Journal of Public Law Studies, 50(1), 333-351. DOI: 10.22059 / jplsq.2018.253329.1689.
    6. Foroughi, F. (2009). Origin and legal nature of the principle of universal jurisdiction. Legal Studies of Shiraz University, 3, 21-47: HYPERLINK "https://www.sid.ir/FileServer/JF/4012613880302.pdf" https://www.sid.ir/FileServer/JF/4012613880302.pdf (In Persian).
    7. Kalantari, F. (2020). Typology of Hybrid Threats and Its Application at the National Security Levels of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Quarterly Journal of National Security Studies, 38, 255-292: https://ns.sndu.ac.ir/article_1263_9af6d9a5934954274de19fdf08f0bd2d.pdf (In Persian).
    8. Khosravi, A. (2021). Comprehensive Model of Monitoring Comprehensive Threats. National Security Studies Quarterly, 39, 67-93: HYPERLINK "https://ns.sndu.ac.ir/article_1409.html" https://ns.sndu.ac.ir/article_1409.html (In Persian).
    9. Maghsoudi, R. (2017). Jurisdiction in Private International Law. International Law Journal, 56, 213-234: HYPERLINK "http://ensani.ir/fa/article/download/378108" http://ensani.ir/fa/article/download/378108 (In Persian).
    10. Seifzadeh, F. (2018). Immunity of States in the Light of the Doctrine of Liability for Protection. Quarterly Journal of Public Law Studies, 1, 121-138: HYPERLINK "https://jplsq.ut.ac.ir/article_66115.html" https://jplsq.ut.ac.ir/article_66115.html (In Persian).

     

    C) Booklet & Interview

    1. Beigzadeh, I. (2012). Law of International Organizations. Vol. 2, Tehran: Majd (In Persian).
Public Law Studies Quarterly
Volume 54, Issue 1
Spring 2024
April 2024
Pages 1-24
Files
History
  • Receive Date: 08 November 2021
  • Revise Date: 19 December 2021
  • Accept Date: 27 February 2022
Share
How to cite
Statistics