Document Type : Article

Authors

1 Associated Prof., Public Law group, Faculty of Islamic Studies and Law, University of Imam sadiq ‎‎(as), Tehran, Iran‎

2 MA. Student in Faculty of Islamic Studies and Law, University of Imam sadiq (as), Tehran, Iran‎

10.22059/jplsq.2022.342174.3071

Abstract

Pursuant to the Law on Respect for Legitimate Freedoms and the Protection of Citizenship Rights adopted in 2004 and its executive instruction, paragraph (15), central and provincial boards were established with oversight of how the law is implemented, complaints are sent and followed up, and finally reporting and monitoring. What appears to be much criticism after nearly two decades of the law's implementation has been doubts about its effectiveness. So, while evaluating the performance and reforming the legislative system related to legitimate freedoms and protection of civil rights, it is necessary to take urgent action to review the institution of the Civil Rights Supervisory Board in order to revive the rights of citizens by comparative study of similar institutions, including ombudsmans and specialized types of them. However, the question of this article is "What are the disadvantages of the Civil Rights Monitoring Board in its structure and performance, and what solutions can be offered to address these issues?" Therefore, in the present article, after examining the harms of the board, suggestions were presented in the areas of cooperation and coordination, promotion and protection of human rights and citizenship, and indicators in restructuring the structure and organization in order to improve the position of the board of civil rights. The research method of this article is descriptive-analytical.

Keywords

Main Subjects

  1. English

    1. A) Books
    2. European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (2020). Strong and effective national human rights institutions; challenges, promising practices and opportunities. Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union
    3. European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (2012). Handbook on the establishment and accreditation of National Human Rights Institutions in the European Union. Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union
    4. Garrine P. L. (2008). The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights: History, Funding, and Current Issues. CRS REPORT FOR CONGRESS.
    5. Isaac Marcelo Basaure Miranda (2017). The Absence of the Ombudsman in Argentina: Seven Years without Collective Representation. Buenos Aires, Argentine, Lomas Zamora National University.
    6. Kämpf, A. (2018). National Human Rights Institutions and their work on migrants’ human rights. Berlin, German Institute for Human Rights
    7. Morten, K. (2003). National human rights institutions implementing human rights, Denmark, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
    8. Pohjolainen, Anna-Elina (2006). The Evolution of National Human Rights Institutions - The Role of the United Nations, Denmark, Handy-Print A/S, Skive.
    9. United Nations (2011). Capacity assessment manual for national human rights institutions.
    10. United Nations (2010). National Human Rights Institutions; History, Principles, Roles and Responsibilities. NewYork and Geneva, Professional Training Series No.4.
    11. United Nations (1993). National Institutions for the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights. Geneva, Fact Sheet No.19

     

    References in Persian & Arabic:

    1. A) Books
    2. The Holy Quran.
    3. Allameh majlisi (1983). Behar Al-Anwar. Beirut: Dar Al-Ahya Al-Tarath Al-Arabi, Vol. 21, Third Edition (In Arabic).
    4. Allameh majlisi (1983). Merat aloqol fi sharhe akhbar all rasoul. Qom, Dar al-Kitab al-Islamiyyah, Vol. 9, Second Printing (In Arabic).
    5. Ghaibi, M. R. (2008). National Human Rights Institutions. Tehran: Ministry of Foreign Affairs Publications, First Edition (In Persian).
    6. Hosseini Tehrani, S. M. H.(1997). Velayat-e-Faqih in the Government of Islam. Vol. 4, Beirut: Dar al-Hijjah al-Bayda (In Arabic).
    7. Judiciary Research Institute (2019). Comprehensive report of the series of scientific sessions on civil rights and its relationship with the Judiciary, Tehran: Press and Publications Center of the Judiciary, first edition (In Persian).
    8. Kaabi, A. (2015). Fundamentals of the Constitutional Law of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Tehran: Imam Sadegh (AS) University Student Basij Publications, First Edition (In Persian).
    9. Montazeri, H. A. (1989). Studies in the jurisprudence and jurisprudence of the Islamic government. Vol. 4, Qom: Tafkar Publications (In Arabic).
    10. Mousavifar, R. (2003). Human Rights Institutions: Islamic Republic of Iran and the United Nations, Tehran: University of Tehran, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Center for Human Rights Studies (In Persian).
    11. Nouri Hamedani, H. (1992). Amr be marouf and nahi az monkar (in arabic). translated by Mohammad Mehdi Eshtehardi, Qom: Islamic Advertising Office Publications, third edition (In Persian).
    12. Sheikh Al-Kalini (1987). Al-Kafi. Corrector: Ali Akbar Ghaffari and Mohammad Akhundi, Tehran: Dar al-Kitab al-Islamiyyah, Vol. 1, Printing Quarterly (In Arabic).

     

    1. B) Thesis and dissertation
    2. Shafiee, J. (2015). Optimal model of the national inspection system from a comparative perspective with emphasis on Iran. (PhD Thesis in Public Law), Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran (In Persian).
    3. Zarei, E. (2014). A Comparative Study of the Principle 90 Commission and Ambodzman. (Master Thesis in Public Law), University of Mazandaran, Mazandaran, Iran (In Persian).

     

    1. C) Articles
    2. Ghamami, S. M. M. (2018). Pattern of Revival of Public Rights with Changes in the System of Judicial Norms and Structures. Journal of Islamic Law, 58, 92-71 (In Persian).
    3. Habibzadeh, Tavakol and the Prophet, Seyed Mohammad Hossein (2020). "Effective Guarantee and Judicial Protection of Citizens' Political Rights in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the Iranian Legal System. Journal of Islamic Law Research, 2(52), 370-345 (In Persian).
    4. Maqami, A. (2013). National Institution of Civil Rights. Journal of Legal Thinkers, 6, 72-37 (In Persian).
    5. Mousavi, S. F. et al. (2012). Assessing the Independence of Ambudzaman Institution with a Comparative View. Private Law Studies, 42(4), 234-217 (In Persian).
    6. Musaizadeh, I. (2011). Comparative Study of the Principle 90 Commission and the Ambulance Institution (Inspection and Supervision Institution). Journal of Judicial Legal Perspectives, 57, 180-157 (In Persian).
    7. Poor Ghahremani Goltieh, B. (2007). Critique of the Law on Respect for Legitimate Freedoms and Protection of Citizenship. Judicial Monthly, 64, 122-115 (In Persian).
    8. Sadeghmanesh, J. (2008). Criminal Policy of the Iranian Legislator in the Law of Respect for Legitimate Freedoms and Protection of Citizenship. Journal of Justice, 62-63, 240-211 (In Persian).
    9. Talabaki, T., & Attar, M. S. (2017). Requirements and Strategies for Establishing a National Human Rights Institution in the Islamic Republic of Iran (In the Light of the Constitution, Islamic Human Rights, the Paris Declaration and the Procedure of Countries). Quarterly Journal of Public Law Knowledge, 17, 44-21 (In Persian).
    10. Ziaeifar, M. H. (1998). Speech of the National Institution and the Islamic Human Rights Commission. Monthly Events and Analyzes, 120, 57-52 (In Persian).

     

    1. D) Documents and laws
    2. Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission (2014). Action Plan of the Independent Human Rights Commission of Afghanistan 2014-2018 (2014-2018) (In Persian).
    3. Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission (2014). Annual report 2013 (In Persian).
    4. Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission (2014). Quarterly Report 2014 (Cancer to arc according to August to December 2014) (In Persian).
    5. Article of the Law on Respect for Legitimate Freedoms and Protection of Citizenship Rights, approved in 2004 (In Persian).
    6. Bill "Citizenship Law and Establishment of National Institution for the Defense of Citizenship" 2004 (In Persian).
    7. Bill "Citizenship Law and Establishment of National Institution for the Defense of Citizenship" 2020 (In Persian).
    8. Criminal Procedure Code approved in 2013 with amendments in 2015 (In Persian).
    9. Document published at the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Palestinian Independent Commission for the Rights of Citizens, Gaza and Ramallah (PCICR); Published in the Journal of Middle East Studies (2000), No. 21 (In Persian).
    10. Executive Instruction of Paragraph 15 of the Law on Respect for Legitimate Freedoms and Protection of Citizenship Rights, approved in 2004 (In Persian).
    11. Law of the Fourth Economic, Social and Cultural Development Plan of the Islamic Republic of Iran, approved in 2004 (In Persian).
    12. Regulations on the method of forming specialized branches of judicial authorities approved by the head of the judiciary in 2019 (In Persian).
    13. The Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran, approved in 1979, was revised in 1989 (In Persian).
    14. United Nations (1993). National Institutions for the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights, Geneva, Fact Sheet No.19 (In Persian).
    15. United Nations (2011). Capacity assessment manual for national human rights institutions (In Persian).