English

1. A) Articles
2. Amershi, S. (2019). Guidelines for human-AI interaction. Microsoft Research, 19, 1-13.
3. Angwin, J. (2016). Machine Bias: There’s Software Used Across the Country to Predict Future Criminals. And it’s Biased Against Blacks. ProPublica, 1-2.
4. Bellovin, S. M. (2014). When Enough is Enough: Location tracking, Mosaic Theory, and Machine Learning. NYU Journal of Law and Liberty, 8, 555-628.
5. Brandom, R. (2018). Amazon’s facial recognition matched 28 members of Congress to criminal mugshots. The Verge, 1-4.
6. Fishman, B. (2019). Crossroads: Counter-Terrorism and the Internet. Texas National Security Review, 2, 2-100.
7. Flores, A. (2018). False Positives, False Negatives, and False Analyses: A Rejoinder to ‘Machine Bias: There’s Software Used Across the Country to Predict Future Criminals. And It’s Biased Against Blacks. Federal Probation,vol. 80, 1-37.
8. Floridi, L. (2020). The fight for Digital Sovereignty: What it is, and Why it Matters, Especially for the EU.Philosophy & Technology, 33, 369–378.
9. Floridi, L. (2021). The European Legislation on AI: a Brief Analysis of its Philosophical Approach. Philosophy & technology, 34, 215–222 .
10. Ghasemi, G. A. & Bagherzadeh, S. (2015). The Position of Human Rights in the Fight against Cyber Terrorism”, International Law Review, 2, 227-254 (In Persian).
11. Hassani, H. (2020). Artificial Intelligence (AI) or Intelligence Augmentation (IA): What Is the Future?. Journal of AI, 1, 143-155.
12. Karabiyik, U. (2016). A Survey of Social Network Forensics. Journal of Digital Forensics” , Security and Law, 11, 55- 123.
13. Kaur, H. (2020). Interpreting interpretability: Understanding data scientists’ use of interpretability tools for machine learning. CHI 2020 Paper, 92, 1-14
14. Land, K. C. (2017). Automating Recidivism Risk Assessment: Should We Stay or Should We Go?. Criminology & Public Policy, 16, 231–233.
15. Lilkov, D. (2021). Regulating Artificial Intelligence in the EU: A Risky Game. European View, 0, 166–174.
16. Macdonald, S. (2019). Regulating terrorist content on social media: Automation and the rule of law. International Journal of Law in Context, 15, 183-197.
17. Mazarian, A. (2019). Critical Analysis against the Argument about the Difference in the Defense of Artificial Intelligence. The Journal of Philosophical -Theological Research (JPTR), 79, 165-190 (In Persian).
18. McKendrick, K. (2019). Artificial Intelligence Prediction and Counterterrorism. The Royal Institute of International Affairs, 1, 1-3.
19. Mirbod, L., Salimi, S., Niavarani, S., & Zamani, S. G. (2019). Cyber Terrorism: Violation of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Medical Law Journal, 13 224-240 (In Persian).
20. Roberts, H. (2021). The Chinese Approach to Artificial Intelligence: An analysis of Policy, Ethics, and Regulation. AI & SOCIETY, 36, 59–77
21. Saltman, E. (2020). Countering Terrorism and Violent Extremism at Facebook: Technology, Expertise and Partnerships. Observer Research Foundation, 1-5.
22. Shackelford, SJ (2009). From Nuclear War to Net War: Analogizing Cyber Attacks in International Law. Berkeley J Int'l Law, 27, 192-251.
23. Smith, W. (2021). UK Intelligence Agency GCHQ Sets out AI Strategy and Ethics. AI strategy, 1, 1-3.
24. Spike Back, N. (2018). The Invention of Inductive Machines and the Artificial Intelligence Controversy. Reseaux, 5, 1-38.
25. Veale, M. (2021). Demystifying the Draft EU Artificial Intelligence Act — Analyzing the Good, the Bad, and the Unclear Elements of the Proposed Approach. Computer Law Review International, 22, 97-112.
26. Veerasamy, N. (2009). Conceptual High-level Framework of Cyberterrori. International Journal of Information Warfare, 8, 1-14.

1. C) Documents
2. Cisco Annual Internet Report (2018–2023), White Paper, 2020, Available at: https://www.cisco.com
3. Frank La Rue, Special Rapporteur on the Promotion and Protection of the Right to Freedom of Opinion and Expression, United Nations General Assembly, A/HRC/17/27, 16 May 2011.
4. Genaral Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), European Union, 2018. Available at:
   https://european-union.europa.eu › index_en
5. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, United Nation General Assembly, 1966.
6. New technology revealed to help fight terrorist content online, Home Office & The Rt Hon Amber Rudd, 2018. Aavailable at: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-technology
7. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Laying down Harmonized Rules on Artificial Intelligence (ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ACT), European Commission, 2021. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT
8. Renda, Andrea, FCAI publishes progress report “Strengthening international cooperation on AI, CEPS, 2022. Available at: https://www.ceps.eu/ceps-news/fcai-publishes-progress-report
9. Resolution on the Promotion, Protection and Enjoyment of Human Rights on the Internet, Human Rights Council, A/HCR/RES/32/13, 18 July 2016.
10. Resolution on the Right to Privacy in the Digital Age, United Nation General Assembly Resolution71/199,26 February2014.
11. Study to Support an Impact Assessment of Regulatory Requirements for Artificial Intelligence in Europe, Final Report, European Union, 2021. Available at: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication.
12. The Rise and Rise of Biometrics Mass Surveillance in the European Digital Rights, Chapter 4, May2020. Available at: https://edri.org/wp-content/
13. Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), 2007. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN
14. United Nations General Assembly Resolution on Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms while Countering Terrorism, United Nations General Assembly, A/RES/62/159, 18 December 2007.
15. United Nations and the Rule of Law, Equality and Non-discrimination, 2004.
16. Using the Internet and Social Media for Counter Terrorism Investigation, INTERPOL & UNCCT, 2021. Available at: https://www.interpol.int/en/News-and-Events/News