Public Law Studies Quarterly

Benefit Sharing: A New Approach in Utilizing Transboundary Rivers

Document Type : Article

Authors

Farhad Derhami 1
Mohammadhossein Ramezani Qavamabadi 2

1 PhD Student in International Law, Faculty of Law, Shahid Beheshti University of Tehran, Iran‎

2 Associate Prof., Department of Public and International Law, Faculty of Law, Shahid Beheshti ‎University of Tehran, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22059/jplsq.2023.348650.3182
Abstract
From the past to the present, use of common water resources has caused conflicts between states, therefore international law has tried to prevent such conflicts. However, with scarcity of available water resources, international water conflicts have increased in recent decades; this can be considered as proof of inability of approaches adopted by states, which are based on quantitative division of water, in facing and solving such conflicts. The current research, using a descriptive-analytical method, indicates that transition from focusing on volumetric allocation of water between states sharing river to establishment of cooperation arrangements between them in order to use river in the most optimal way available and the fair sharing of benefits from this cooperation can be considered a more favourable option for using these valuable water resources. In fact, application of benefit sharing arrangements in the use of transboundary rivers, which is also supported by the fundamental principles of international water law, through transformation of win-loss result due to water sharing into a win-win result due to cooperation in the optimal use of common water resources, increases interests of states and not only prevents water conflicts, but is able to develop and strengthen international cooperation.

Keywords

international water law
benefit sharing
equitable and reasonable use
transboundary rivers
Subjects

  1. English

    1. A) Books
    2. Daoudy, M. (2010). Getting Beyond the Environment–Conflict Trap: Benefit Sharing in International River Basins. in Earle, Anton & Jägerskog, Anders & Öjendal, Joakim (eds.) Transboundary Water Management: Principles and Practice, London, Routledge.
    3. Klager, R. (2011). Fair and Equitable Treatment in International Investment Law. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
    4. Laurie, G., Dove, E., Ganguli-Mitra, A., Mcmillan, C., Postan, E., Sethi, N., Sorbie, A. (2021). The Cambridge Handbook of Health Research Regulation. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
    5. McCaffrey, C. Stephen. (2019). The Law of International Watercourses. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
    6. McIntyre, O. (2010). International Water Law: Concepts, Evolution and Development. in Earle, Anton & Jägerskog, Anders & Öjendal, Joakim (eds.) Transboundary Water Management: Principles and Practice, London, Routledge.
    7. Melesse, A., Abtew, Wossenu & Moges S. (2021). Nile and Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam: Past, Present and Future. Springer International Publishing.
    8. Salman, M.A. Salman & Uprety, K. (2003). Conflict and Cooperation on South Asia's International Rivers.Washington, World Bank.
    9. Stilz, A. (2019). Resource Sovereignty and International Responsibilities. in Stilz Anna (ed.) Territorial Sovereignty: A Philosophical Exploration, Oxford, Oxford Political Theory.
    10. Weston, B., & Bollier, D. (2013). Green Governance. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
    11. Wouters, P. & Moynihan, R. (2013). Benefit sharing in the UNWatercourses Convention and under International Water Law. in Rocha Loures, Flavia, Rieu-Clarke, Alistair (eds.). The UN Watercourses Convention in Force, Strengthening International Law for Transboundary Water Management, London, Routledge.

     

    1. B) Articles
    2. Alam, U., Dione, O., & Jeffrey, P. (2009). The benefit-sharing principle: Implementing sovereignty bargains on water. Political Geography, 28 (2), 90-100.
    3. Avarideh, F., Attari, J., & Moridi, A. (2017). Modelling Equitable and Reasonable Water Sharing in Transboundary Rivers: the Case of Sirwan-Diyala River. Water Resour Manage, 31, 1191–1207.
    4. Barberis, J. (1991). The Development of International Law of Transboundary Groundwater. Natural Resources Journal, 31, 167-186.
    5. Dauda, B. & Dierickx, K. (2013). Benefit sharing: an exploration on the contextual discourse of a changing concept. BMC medical ethics, 14, 1-8.
    6. De Jonge, Bege (2011). “What is Fair and Equitable Benefit-sharing?”, Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 24, pp. 127–146.
    7. De Jonge, Bege and & Korthals, M. (2007). Vicissitudes of benefit sharing of crop genetic resources. Developing world bioethics, 6 (3), 144-157.
    8. Devlaeminck, D. (2018). Revisiting the Substantive Rules of the Law of International Watercourses: An Analysis Through the Lens of Reciprocity and the Interests of China. Water Policy, 20. 323-335.
    9. Distefano, G. (2010). Theories on Territorial Sovereignty: A Reappraisal. Journal of Sharia and Law, 41, 25-47.
    10. Dombrowsky, I. (2009). Revisiting the potential for benefit sharing in the management of trans-boundary rivers. Water Policy, 11 (2), 125–140.
    11. Eckstein, G. (1995). Application of International Water Law to Transboundary Groundwater Resources. Suffolk Transnational Law Review, 69 (67), 67-116.
    12. Eckstein, G. (2020). The status of the UN Watercourses Convention: does it still hold water?. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 36:2-3, 429-461.
    13. Gourbesville, P. (2008). “Challenges for integrated water resources management. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 33, 284-289
    14. Grey, D., & Sadoff, C. (2002). Beyond the River: The Benefits of Cooperation on International Rivers”, Water Policy, 4. 389–403.
    15. Grzybowski, A., McCaffrey C. Stephen. & Paisley K. R. (2010). Beyond International Water Law: Successfully Negotiating Mutual Gains Agreements for International Watercourses. McGeorge Global Business & Development Law Journal, 22, 139-154.
    16. Lazerwitz, J. D. (1993). The Flow of International Water Law: The International Law Commission's Law of the Non-Navigational Uses of International Watercourses. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 1 (1), 247-269.
    17. Leb, C. (2015). One step at a time: international law and the duty to cooperate in the management of shared water resources. Water International, 40 (1), 21-32.
    18. Lee, S. (2015). Benefit sharing in the Mekong River basin. Water International, 40 (1), 139-152.
    19. Lodge, W. Micheal (2012). “The Common Heritage of Mankind. The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 27 (4). pp. 733-742.
    20. Madani, K. (2010). Game theory and water resources. Journal of Hydrology, 381, 225-238.
    21. McIntyre, O. (2013). Utilisation of Shared International Freshwater Resources – The Meaning and Role of Equity in International Water Law. Water International, 38, 112.
    22. McIntyre, O. (2015). Benefit-sharing and upstream/downstream cooperation for ecological protection of transboundary waters: opportunities for China as an upstream state. Water International, 40 (1), 48-70.
    23. Medaglia, J. C., & Perron-Welch, F. (2019). The benefit-sharing principle in international law. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 14, 62-76
    24. Middleton, C., & Devlaeminck, D. (2021). Reciprocity in practice: the hydropolitics of equitable and reasonable utilization in the Lancang-Mekong basin. International Environmental Agreements, 21, 235–253.
    25. Morgera, E. (2016). The Need for an International Legal Concept of Fair and Equitable Benefit Sharing. The European Journal of International Law, 27 (2), 354-388.
    26. Morgera, E. (2017). Fair and Equitable Benefit-Sharing: History, Normative Content and Status in International Law. 'Benefit-sharing’ in E Orlando and L Krämer (eds.). Encyclopedia of Environmental Law: Principles of Environmental Law.
    27. Onencan, A., & Walle, B. (2018). Equitable and Reasonable Utilization: Reconstructing the Nile Basin Water Allocation Dialogue. Water, 10 (6), 707-739.
    28. Paisley, R. (2002). Adversaries into Partners: International Water Law and the Equitable Sharing of Downstream Benefits. Melbourne Journal of International Law, 3 (2), 280-300
    29. Qaddumi, H. (2008). Practical approaches to transboundary water benefit sharing.ODI Working Paper. Available at: https://www.odi.org/resources/docs/2576.pdf.
    30. Rahaman, M. M. (2009). Principles of Transboundary Water Resources Management and Ganges Treaties: An Analysis. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 25 (1), 159-173.
    31. Sadoff, W. Claudia & Grey, D. (2005). Cooperation on International Rivers. Water International, (30), 420-427.
    32. Salman M.A. S. (2021). Equitable and Reasonable Utilization and the Obligation Against Causing Significant Harm – Are they Reconcilable?. AJIL Unbound, 115, 183-188.
    33. Salman, M. A. S. (2007). The Helsinki Rules, the UN Watercourses Convention and the Berlin Rules: Perspectives on International Water Law. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 23, (4), 625–640.
    34. Schroeder, D. (2007). Benefit sharing: it's time for a definition. Journal of Medical Ethics, 33 (4), 205-209.
    35. Soliev, I., & Theesfeld, I. (2020). Benefit Sharing for Solving Transboundary Commons Dilemma in Central Asia. International Journal of the Commons, 14(1), 61–77.
    36. Soliev, I., Wegerich, Kai & Kazbekov, J. (2015). The Costs of Benefit Sharing: Historical and Institutional Analysis of Shared Water Development in the Ferghana Valley, the Syr Darya Basin. Water, 7. 2728-2752.
    37. Soumya, R., & Neha, T. (2021). Equitable and Reasonable Utilization of Water Resources: A Critical Analysis in Context of Indo-Bangladesh Ganges Water Sharing. BiLD Law Journal, 5(2), 103–118.
    38. Tanzi, M. A. (2021). The inter‑relationship between no harm, equitable and reasonable utilisation and cooperation under international water law. International Enviroment Agreement, 20, pp. 619-629.
    39. Tarlock, A. D. & Wouters, P. (2007). Are Shared Benefits of International Waters an Equitable Apportionment?. Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Policy, 18 (3), 523-536.
    40. Tysyachnyouk, S. Maria & Petrov, N. A. (2018). Benefit sharing in the Arctic energy sector: Perspectives on corporate policies and practices in Northern Russia and Alaska. Energy Research & Social Science, 39, 29-34.

     

    1. C) Documents and Cases
    2. Case Relating to the Territorial Jurisdiction of the International Commission of the River Oder, 1929, P.C.I.J. (ser. A). No. 23.
    3. Certain Activities Carried Out by Nicaragua in the Border Area, 2015, Judgment, I.C.J. Reports.
    4. Corfu Channel, 1949, Judgment, I.C.J. Reports
    5. Dispute regarding Navigational and Related Rights, 2009, Judgment, I.C.J. Reports.
    6. Dispute regarding Navigational and Related Rights, 2009, Judgment, I.C.J. Reports.
    7. Factory of Charzow case (1928), PCIJ Reports.
    8. Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Project Case, 1997, Judgment, I.C.J. Reports.
    9. Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, 1966, Advisory Opinions, I.C.J. Reports.
    10. Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay, 2010, Judgment, I.C.J. Reports,

     

    References In persian:

    - Articles

    1. Alipour, M., & Talebian, H. (2018). Shared water resources in kura-aras river basin; the promoter of peace in south caucasia. Journal of central eurasia studies, 11(1), 231-246 (In Persian).
    2. Avarideh, F., Attari, J., & Abdollahi, M. (2016). Comparative study of the international law related to water sharing in trans- boundary rivers. Environmental sciences, 14(2), 79-96 (In Persian).
    3. Dawood Muhammed, S., & Abdulqader Salih waladbagi, A. (2021). The Principle of Cooperation in the Use of International Watercourses, with Emphasis on Iran-Iraq International Watercourses. Public Law Studies Quarterly, 51(4), 1459-1486 (In Persian).
    4. Jafari Valadani, A. (2010). Use of water resources of Iran and Iraq border Rodham and International Law’, Public Law Researsh, 11(26), 63-92 (In Persian).
    5. khandani, S.p., & Khakbaz, M. (2013). The interpretation of commutative justice theory in the realm of contracts’, Journal of Studies in Islamic Law & Jurisprudence, 5(8), 69-84 (In Persian).
    6. Mianabadi, H., & Amini, A. (2018). “Complexity of Water, Politics, and Environment in the Euphrates and Tigris River Basins. International Quarterly Journal of Geopolitics, 15(54), 54-86 (In Persian).
    7. Mirzaei-Nodoushan, F., & Bozorg Haddad, O. (2021). Assessing the Effect of the Basket of Benefits on the Interaction between Transboundary River Countries. Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research, 52(9), 2441-2445 (In Persian).
    8. Momtaz, D. (1995). International legal system of waterways and water resources in the Middle East. International Law Review, 13(18-19), 45-94 (In Persian).
    9. Naderi, M., & Sadat Meidani, H. (2020). Evolution of the Law of Transboundary Aquifers in International Law. Public Law Studies Quarterly, 50(3), 1073-1094 (In Persian).
    10. Noori, M., & Emadi, A., & fazloula, R. (2019). Integrated model of water optimal allocation with a cooperative game approach case study. Journal of water and soil, 33(5), 695-708 (In Persian).
    11. Shafiei Bafti, N., & Soleimani, S. (2021). Relationship between Reasonable and Equitable Principle and No-harm Principle in the International Watercourses Law based on the 1997 Convention. Public Law Studies Quarterly, 51(4), 1579-1601 (In Persian).
    12. Shiraian, S.,& Khatibi, A. (2016). Non-navigational uses of international watercourses in the lighte of sustainable development. Journal of Sustainability, Development and Environment, 2(4), 73 – 85 (In Persian).
    13. Sholi, A., & Vatanfada, J., & Avaride, F. (2015). Examining legal theories and water sharing regulations in international laws and treaties on border waters. Journal of Border Science and Technology ,4(13), 121-152 (In Persian).
    14. Zamani, S. G., & Berelian, P. (2022). Construction and operation of Ilısu Dam by the Turkish government in the context of international law. Public Law Studies Quarterly, 1-27 (In Persian).
Public Law Studies Quarterly
Volume 53, Issue 4
Winter 2024
Winter 2024
Pages 1961-1987

  • Receive Date 18 September 2022
  • Revise Date 07 November 2022
  • Accept Date 30 January 2023

Home

Journal Process Ethics

Peer Review Process

Submission

Indexing and Abstracting

Contact Us