Document Type : Article
Authors
1 Associate Prof., Department of Public Law, Faculty of Law, University of Qom, Qom, Iran
2 PH. D. in Student in Public law, Faculty of law, University of Qom, Qom, Iran
Abstract
The government of the Islamic Republic is the product of a comprehensive revolution by the people of Iran, which is noteworthy from various aspects, such as the role of the people and Islamic law within it. This research aims to achieve an analysis of this government within the framework of modern public law. The study has been conducted using a comparative-historical method, and based on this, it can be said that the foundations of the Islamic Republic of Iran align closely with modern public law principles in many respects, such as national sovereignty, the establishment of founding power, and the role of the people in organizing the government. However, in the areas of legislation and its subsequent implementation within the framework of Islamic law, there is a clear divergence between these two concepts when viewed through the lens of public law principles. Nevertheless, considering that the determination of Islamic law has been accompanied by the choice of the Iranian people rather than imposition from outside, and also in light of recent theories regarding political modernity, including multiple modernities that discuss the possibility of integrating this concept with other cultures, one can refer to the formation of a distinct and tailored model of government (the Islamic Republic of Iran) within the framework of public law, which differs in various ways from other governments formed within the context of modern public law.
Keywords
Main Subjects
English
- A) Books
- Hornby, A., Ashby, S, Michael & Wehmeier Sally (2000). Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary of Current English, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
- Hobbes, T. (1996). Leviathan [1651], Tuck, R. ed, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
- Hallaq, W. (2013). The Impossible State: Islam, Politics, and Modernity’s Moral Predicament. New York City, Columbia University Press.
- Kant, I. (1909). Critique of Practical Reason, Trans. Abbott, TK, New York, Prometheus Book.
- Kelsen, H. (1992). Introduction to the Problem of Legal Theory. Oxford, Clarendon Press.
- Lawson, G. (1992). Political Sacra at Civilis or, A Modell of Civil and Ecclesiasticall Government [1660], Condren, C. ed. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
- Locke, J. (1988). Tow Treatises of Government. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
- Loughlin, M. (2012). Foundations of Public Law. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
- Machiavelli, N. (1983). the Discourses [1531]. Harmondsworth, Penguin.
- Oakeshott, M. (1975). On The Character of a Modern European State in His on Human Conduct, oxford, Clarendon Press.
- Reinhard, W. (1966). Power Elites and State building. Oxford, Clarendon Press.
- Rousseau, J. J., 1968, the Social Contract [1762], M. Cranston trans. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
- Ruiz, Lester Edwin J. (1990). Sovereignty as Transformative Practice, in Saul H. Mendlovitz and R.B.J. Walker, eds., Colorado, Lynne Rienner Publishers.
- Rostow, W. (1971). The Stages of Economic Growth. London, Cambridge University Press.
- Sieyes, E. J. (1963). What is the Third Estate?. London, Pall Mall Press.
- Vincent, A. (1991). Theories of the State, Wiley-Blackwell.
- Walters, M. (2008). Written Constitutions and Unwritten Constitutionalism, In G. Huscroft (Ed.), Expounding the Constitution: Essays in Constitutional Theory (pp. 245-276). Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
- Wolin, S. S. (2001). Tocqueville between Two Worlds: The Making of a Political and Theoretical Life. Princeton, Princeton University Press.
- B) Articles
- Eisenstadt, S.N. (2000). Multiple Modernities. Daedalus, 120(1).
- Roznai, Y. (2013). The Theory and Practice of Supra-Constitutional Limits on Constitutional Amendments. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 62(3).
- Ullmann, W. (1949). The Development of the Medieval Idea of Sovereignty. English Historical Review, 1-33.
- C) Documents
- 1958, The French Constitution, adopted by the referendum of September 28, 1958 and promulgated on October 4, 1958. French text and English translation. New York: French Embassy, Press and Information Division.
References In Persian:
- Book
- Aghaeetog, M. (2017). The Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Tehran, Khorsandi Publishing (In Persian).
- Arasta, M.J. (2015). A look at the analytical foundations of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Qom: Boostaneketab publishing (In Persian).
- Barbier, M. (2019). Political modernity. Tehran: Agah publishing House (In Persian).
- Berger, P. L. (2018). The Sacred Canopy: Elements of a Sociological Theory of Religion. Translated by Morshedi, Abolfazl, Tehran: Saless Publication (In Persian).
- Beheshti, M.H. (1999). The Foundations of Constitution Law. Tehran: Beheshti Foundation (In Persian).
- Panahi, M.H. (2013). The Sociology of Slogans of the Islamic Revolution of Iran, Tehran: Elm Publication (In Persian).
- Duguit, L. (2009). Lecons de droit public general, Translated by Vijeh, Mohamad Reza, Tehran, Mizan Legal Foundation (In Persian).
- Zerang, M. (2006). The Story of Fundamental Law in Three Country: Iran, France and America. Tehran: the Center for Islamic Revolution Documents Publishing. (in Persian)
- Khomeini [Imam], R. (2007). Sahifeh-Ye Imam. Tehran, the Institute for Compilation and Publication of Imam Khomeini's Works, Vol. 4, 5 & 6 (In Persian).
- Khomeini [Imam], R. (2016). Velayate-faghih, Tehran: the Institute for Compilation and Publication of Imam Khomeini's Works (In Persian).
- Dabirnia, A. (2017) Constituent Power: Research in Modern Constitutional Law, the SD Institute of Law Research and Study (In Persian).
- Taleghani, M. (1968). Partovi az Qoran. Tehran: Hermes publication (In Persian).
- AmidZanjani, A.A.(2019). Constitutional Law. Tehran: Khorsandi Publishing (In Persian).
- AmidZanjani, Abbas-Ali (2014). Generality of Constitutional Law. Tehran: Majd Publishing (In Persian).
- Gharavi Naini, M.H. (2009). Tanbih al-Ummah wa Tanzih Al-Milla Tehran: the Center for Islamic Revolution Documents Publishing (In Arabic).
- Ka'bi, A. (2016). Analytical foundations of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Tehran: Research Institute of Guardian Council (In Persian).
- Kant, I. (2016). Religion within the Bounds of Bare Reason, Tehran, Naghshonegar Publishing (In Persian).
- Geuss, R. (2018). Public Goods Private Goods.Tehran: Nashremarkaz Publishing. (In Persian).
- Loughlin, M. (2017). The Idea of Public Law. Translated by rasrekh, Mohammad, Tehran: Nashr-e Ney Publishing (In Persian).
- Locke, L. (2009). Two Treatises of Government. Translated by Azdanlou Hamid, Tehran: Nashr-e Ney Publishing (In Persian).
- Madani, J. (2009). Foundations of Political Science. Tehran: Aallameh Tabatabai Publishing (In Persian).
- Mesbah-Yazdi, M.T.(2013). Pursish-ha wa pasukh-ha. Qom: Imam Khomeini Educational and Research Institute Publishing (In Persian).
- Makarim-Shirazi, N. (1986). Tafsir Nemooneh. Qom: Dar-Al-kotob Al-Eslamieh (In Persian).
- Moeen-Fard, M.R. (2007). The Rout of Complication and approval of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Tehran: the Center for Islamic Revolution Documents Publishing (In Persian).
- Mirsepasi, A. (2015). Intellectual Discourse and the Politics of Modernization: Negotiating Modernity in Iran, Tehran, Saless Publication (In Persian).
- Held, D. (2008). Understanding Modern Societies: The Development of the Modern State,Tehran: Agah publishing House (In Persian).
- Hashemi, M. (1996). The constitutional Law of Islamic Republic of Iran.Tehran: Beheshti University press (In Persian).
- Articles
- Panahi, H. (2001). Analysis of the Backgrounds and Objectives of the Islamic Revolution of Iran, Based on the Revolutionary Slogans. Social Science Quarterly, 12, 63-84 (In Persian).
- Dabirnia, A. (2019). Republicanism and Islamism in the constitution of Iran sovereignty; dual or unit. Comparative Law Researches, 22(3), 83-104 (In Persian).
- Rahmani, G., Kadkhodamoradi, k., & Saeedi, M. (2021). Critical Analysis of Intellectuals’ Theoretical Confrontation with Concept of Law Based on Philosophical Foundations of Modern Law. Journal of Public Law, 51( 3), 929-950 (In Persian).
- Ghari-SeyedFatemi, M., Moradi, M., & Beheshti, A. (2018). The Impossible State: A Critical Reading of Hallaq’s Theory on Impossibility of Islamic Modern State. Journal of Public Law Research, 19(58), 81-112 (In Persian).
- GorjiAzandaryani, A. (2004). Supra Constitutional Principle and National Sovereignti. Journal of Constitutional Law, 1(1), 239-284 (In Persian).
- Ejtahed Nejad Kashani, S., & Saei, A. (2017), Constructing modernity in Iran: an attempt to formulate a theoretical apparatus. Quartery Journal of Socio-Cultural Development Studies, 6(2), 151-175 (In Persian).
- Mousavi Asl, S. (2018). The Subjective approach to law in the philosophy of Kant. Islamic Knowledge, 5(1), 61-78 (In Persian).
)