Document Type : Article

Authors

Assistant Prof., Department of Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran

Abstract

The International Narcotics control system has imposed strict drug control policies in order to achieve a drug free world. However, ineffectiveness of these polices besides economic, social and health costs make them hard to support. In the meantime, special characteristic of cannabis has steered countries to take a new approach. Colorado and Washington have legalized cannabis. Canada, Uruguay and some other US states, joined this process. On the contrary, international drug control agencies have accused these countries for violating drug conventions. Therefore, the main question of the present study is to investigate how international drug control system will face with the cannabis legalization in the named countries? Accordingly, the purpose of this study is to analyze the developments of the international drug control system following the implementation of legalization policy. In this research, using descriptive and analytical methods, we seek to answer the main question by examining the pro-legalization states approaches, the position of international drug control agencies and member states of the drug conventions, also the drug conventions provisions, as well as the existing legal solutions to remove accusation of violating the conventions. Findings show that despite the resistance of international drug agencies, pro-legalization states have not yet given up on this policy, and other countries may even align themselves with them and make a new order to control drugs. These issues will confirm the research hypothesis on the necessity to review the international drug control system in the light of cannabis legalization.

Keywords

Main Subjects

  1. English

    1. Articles
    2. Barrett, D., Hannah, J., & Lines, R. (2020). What Does it Mean to Adopt a Human Rights-Based Approach to Drug Policy?. Health and Human Rights22(1), 355.
    3. Bewley‐Taylor, D. R. (2018). Canada, cannabis legalization and uncertainty around the United Nations drug control conventions. Addiction113(7), 1226-1228.
    4. Blickman, T. (2014). Cannabis policy reform in Europe. Bottom up rather than top down. Series on Legislative Reform of Drug Policies28.
    5. Blickman, T. (2018). The elephant in the room: Cannabis in the international drug control regime. In Collapse of the Global Order on Drugs: From UNGASS 2016 to Review 2019. Emerald Publishing Limited.
    6. Boister, N. (2016). Waltzing on the Vienna Consensus on Drug Control: Tensions in the International System for the Control of Drugs. LJIL29, 389.
    7. Boister, N., & Jelsma, M. (2018). Inter se modification of the UN drug control conventions: An exploration of its applicability to legitimise the legal regulation of cannabis markets. International Community Law Review20(5), 456-492.
    8. Bradford, A. C., Bradford, W. D., Abraham, A., & Adams, G. B. (2018). Association between US state medical cannabis laws and opioid prescribing in the Medicare Part D population. JAMA internal medicine, 178(5), 667-672.
    9. Caulkins, J. P. (2015). After the grand fracture: Scenarios for the collapse of the international drug control regime. Journal of Drug Policy Analysis10(2).
    10. Caulkins, J. P., Kilmer, B., Kleiman, M., MacCoun, R. J., Midgette, G., Oglesby, P., . & Reuter, P. H. (2015). Considering marijuana legalization: Insights for Vermont and other jurisdictions. Rand Corporation.
    11. Coomber, R., Moyle, L., & South, N. (2016). The normalisation of drug supply: The social supply of drugs as the “other side” of the history of normalisation. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 23(3), 255-263.
    12. Emerson, B. (2019). Regulation of illegal drugs–no longer What?, but How?. Journal of Illicit Economies and Development, 1(3), 251-254.
    13. Fischer, B., Daldegan-Bueno, D., & Boden, J. M. (2020). Facing the option for the legalisation of cannabis use and supply in New Zealand: an overview of relevant evidence, options and considerations. Drug and alcohol review.
    14. Haase, H. J. (2019). Principled Noncompliance: Paving the Way for Cannabis Regulation under the International Drug Control Regime. International Community Law Review21(1), 93-119.
    15. Habibi, R., & Hoffman, S. J. (2017). Legalizing cannabis violates the UN drug control treaties, but progressive countries like Canada have options. Ottawa L. Rev.49, 427.
    16. Hall, W. (2018). Imperfect international treaties interpreted flexibly are likely to be better than no treaties. Addiction113(7), 1230-1230.
    17. Hall, W. (2018). The future of the international drug control system and national drug prohibitions. Addiction113(7), 1210-1223.
    18. Hoffman, S. J., & Habibi, R. (2016). International legal barriers to Canada’s marijuana plans. CMAJ188(10), E215-E216.
    19. Klein, A., & Stothard, B. (Eds.). (2018). Collapse of the global order on drugs: From UNGASS 2016 to review 2019. Emerald Group Publishing.
    20. Luc, M. H., Tsang, S. W., Thrul, J., Kennedy, R. D., & Moran, M. B. (2020). Content analysis of online product descriptions from cannabis retailers in six US states. International Journal of Drug Policy, 75, 102593.
    21. Panicker, B. (2016). Legalization of Marijuana and the Conflict with International Drug Control Treaties. -Kent J. Int'l & Comp. L.16, 1.
    22. Sandhu, H. S., Anderson, L. N., & Busse, J. W. (2019). Characteristics of Canadians likely to try or increase cannabis use following legalization for nonmedical purposes: a cross-sectional study. CMAJ open, 7(2), E399.
    23. Serné, F. (2017). Cannabis Regulation in Uruguay: Reducing Harm and Improving Security? 
    24. van Kempen, P. H., & Fedorova, M. (2018). Regulated Legalization of Cannabis through Positive Human Rights Obligations and Inter se Treaty Modification. International Community Law Review20(5), 493-526.
    25. Walsh, J., & Jelsma, M. (2019). Regulating drugs: resolving conflicts with the UN drug control treaty system. Journal of Illicit Economies and Development1(3), 266-271.
    26. Walsh, J., & Ramsey, G. (2015). Uruguay’s drug policy: Major innovations, major challenges. Washington
    27. Walsh, J., Blickman, T., Jelsma, M., & Bewley-Taylor, D. (2016). Yes, legalizing marijuana breaks treaties. We can deal with that. Policy
    28. Walsh, J., Jelsma, M., Blickman, T., & Bewley-Taylor, D. (2019). The WHO’s First-Ever Critical Review of Cannabis: A Mixture of Obvious Recommendations Deserving Support and Dubious Methods and Outcomes Requiring Scrutiny. Policy.
    29. Wodak, A. (2018). From failed global drug prohibition to regulating the drug market. Addiction113(7), 1225-1226.

     

    International Documents

    1. Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs 1961
    2. United Nations Convention on Psychotropic Substances 1971
    3. United Nations Convention against Ilicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances 1988
    4. United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime 2000
    5. INCB Annual Report 2019.
    6. INCB Annual Report 2013.
    7. Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties.
    8. International Drug Policy Consortium. (2019). The 2019 Commission on Narcofic Drugs and its Ministerial Segment.

     

    References In Persian:

    1. A) Artciles
    2. Binazadeh, F., & Raisi, L. (2019). Legislative and judicial developments regarding the war against drugs in Ungas countries. Public Law Studies Quarterly, 50(1), 421-401 (In Persian).
    3. Rahimipour, I., Habibzadeh, M. J., Mohagheq Damad, M., Farjiha M., & Omidi, J. (2015). harm reduction policy for drug use, "Comparative study in the criminal justice system of Iran, Portugal and Canada. Journal of Comparative Law Research, 20, (30), 84-109 (In Persian).
    4. Shaygan, F., Rahmani Kalakob, I. (2018). The need for the alignment of the Islamic Council with the government's international obligations in dealing with crimes related to narcotics and psychotropic substances. Public Law Research Quarterly, 21(62), 101-125 (In Persian).
    5. Farjiha, M., & Allahvardi, F. (2019). Cultural criminology approach to changing the pattern of drug use among young people, criminal law doctrines, 7, 83-106 (In Persian).
    6. Kosha, J., & Shaygan, F. (2019). An attitude on drug trafficking and migrant trafficking in international treaties, Journal of Legal Research, 55, 211-165 (In Persian).

     

    1. B) Theses
    2. Tatari, A. (2018). Decriminalization of drugs and its effects (case study of Portugal). Master's thesis of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad (In Persian).
    3. Sadeghi, A. (2016). Evidence based Approache to criminal interventions in drug crimes in Iran. doctoral dissertation of Tarbiat Modares University (In Persian).
    4. Kavsi, Y. (2016). Legalization of narcotic drugs and the possibility of its implementation in Iran's criminal policy. master's thesis of Allameh Tabatabai University (In Persian).