Document Type : Article

Author

Assistant Prof., Department of Islamic Philosophy, Faculty of Philosophy and Religions, Al-Mustafa International University, Qom, Iran

10.22059/jplsq.2021.316816.2683

Abstract

The fluent and simple structure of the ordinary language philosophy paved the way for many analytical philosophers in England to turn to this field, so that they based their analysis on current propositions in people's daily lives. J. L. Austin as one of the most influential philosophers in the intellectual law in the UK, Especially the thoughts of Herbert Hart, has been taken into consideration. In The Concept of Law, Hart does not explain the philosophical foundations of his discussion, but uses the results of the views of analytical philosophers, especially the philosophers of ordinary language, in explaining and analyzing the concept of law. For this reason, in this study, an attempt has been made to explain the view of J. L. Austin as the most influential philosopher of conventional language in Hart's thought, in order to get acquainted with Hart's philosophical thought and to clarify the quality of application of these principles in legal issues.

Keywords

  1. English

    1. A) Books
    2. Austin, J.L(1961). A Plea to Excuse. in Philosophical Papers, edited by J.O. Urmson and G.J.Warnock, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    3. Austin, J.L (1962). Sense and Sensiilia. Edited by G. Warnock, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    4. Brown, G. Yule, G. (1989). Discourse Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York and Oakleigh.
    5. Dworkin, R. (1986). Law’s Empire, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
    6. Hart, H.L.A. (1994). The Concept of Law. with postscript edited by Penelope A .Bulloch and Joseph Raz, Clarendon perss oxford, second edition.
    7. Hobbes, Thomas (1951). Llewellyn. The Bramble Bush, New York, Oceana Publication.
    8. Kelsen, Hans(1949). General Theory of Law and State.
    9. Lyons, J. (1990). Language and Linguistics. Cambridge‏ University‏ Press, Cambridge, New York and Oakleigh.
    10. Searle, J. R. (1969). Austin. in Martinich A.P. and Sosa David (eds.), A Companion to Analytic Philosophy.

     

    1. B) Articles
    2. Austin, J.L (1953). How to Talk some simple ways and truth. in Philosophical Papers.
    3. Austin, J.L (1832). The Province of jurisprudence Determined. Lecture VI.
    4. Holmes, 0. W. (1920). The Path of the Law. in Collected Papers.

     

    References In Persian:

    1. A) Books
    2. Fairclough, N. (1999) Critical Discourse Analysis, translated by Fatemeh Shayesteh Piran and est, Tehran: Daftar Motaleat va Toseeh Resaneha press (In Persian).
    3. Hanfling, O. (2004). Philosophy and ordinary language. translated by Mahmood Arfa, Tehran: Gameno perss (In Persian).
    4. Hart, H.L.A. (2014). The Concept of Law. translated by Mohammad Rasekh, Tehran, Ney press (In Persian).
    5. Lycan, W. (2016). Philosophy of Language: A Contemporary Introduction. translated by Meysam Mohammad Amini, Tehran: Hermes press (In Persian).
    6. Searle, J. (2008) speech act. translated by Mohamad Ali Abdollahi, Qom: Pajoheshgahe Olom va Farhang Eslami (In Persian).
    7. Stroll, A. (2005) Twentieth-Century Analytic Philosophy. translated by Ferydon Fatemi, Tehran: Markaz press (In Persian).

     

    1. B) Articles
    2. Fazaeli, S. M., & Negresh, M. (2011). Fifty-one Nahj al-Balaghah sermons analysis based on Searle's classification of speech act. Journal of Islamic Studies Science and Quran and Hadith, summer, 43(1), 81-118 (In Persian).