Public Law Studies Quarterly

Current Issue

By Issue

By Author

Author Index

Keyword Index

Journal About

Editorial Board

Journal Aim Scope

News

Journal FAQ

Journal Links

Guide for Authors

Author Guidelines for Manuscript Submission

Reviewers List

Investigating and evaluating the intervention of foreign actors in the Syrian crisis based on international norms and laws

Articles in Press

Document Type : Article

Authors

1 PhD student of International Relations, Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, Gilan University. Gilan, Iran

2 Professor of International Relations, Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, Gilan University. Gilan, Iran

Abstract

Although governments are restricted from interfering in the affairs of other countries without the approval of the Security Council; But they use international law in various ways to justify their unilateral interference in each other's internal affairs. However, customary international law and the UN Charter generally prohibit the use of force in international relations. Thus, the main question of the research is what norms and international laws do foreign actors use to justify their intervention in the Syrian crisis? The hypothesis of the present study is that the opponents of the Syrian political system, including; The United States and its regional and international allies, with the aim of equipping the opposition of the Syrian political regime and weakening the regime, as well as controlling and dismantling the Iranian-centered resistance front in the region, claiming international peace and security and sometimes with reasons. Humanitarian intervention in the Syrian crisis; Meanwhile, Iran and Russia entered the Syrian conflict on the principle of invitation and at the request of the legitimate Syrian government, and never intended to pursue territorial expansion and dominate the region. Qualitative analysis method has been used to analyze the research data.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1.  

    English

    1. A) Books
    2. Badsey, S., & Latawski, P. (2004). Britain, NATO and the Lessons of the Balkan Conflicts, 1991 -1999, taylor & francis e-library, 1-213
    3. Balanche, F. (2018). Sectarianism in Syria’s Civil War. Washington Institute for Near East Policy, 1-157
    4. citlioglu, E. (2020). A Turkish Perspective on Syria, The Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung, 1-36

     

    1. B) Articles
    2. Bannelier-Christakis, K. (2016). Military Interventions against ISIL in Iraq, Syria and Libya, and the Legal Basis of Consent. Leiden Journal of International Law, 29(3). 743-775.
    3. Barkin, J. S., & Cronin, B. (May 22, 2009). The state and the nation: changing norms and the rules of sovereignty in international relations. Quarterly Of International Organization, 48(1), 107–130.
    4. Deeks, A. (2012). Unwilling or Unable': Toward an Normative Framework for Extra-Territorial Self-Defense. Virginia Journal of International Law, 52(3), 483-550
    5. Hoenselaar, K. (2020). Humanitarian Intervention in Syria?. Tilburg Law School, 1-53.
    6. Humud, Carla E. (2018). Armed Conflict in Syria: Overview and U.S. Response, Congressional Research Service, 1-33.
    7. Lynch, Marc And Deen Freelon And Sean Aday(2014). Syria in the Arab Spring: The integration of Syria’s conflict with the Arab uprisings, 2011–2013. Journal Of Research and Politics, 1(3), 1-7.
    8. Lanovoy, V. (2017). The Use of Force by Non-State Actors and the Limits of Attribution of Conduct. The European Journal of International Law, 28(2), 563–585
    9. Mohamed, S. (2010). Restructuring the Debate on Unauthorized Humanitarian Intervention. Quarterly of North Carolina Law Review, 88(4), 1276-1332.
    10. Ogunnowo, O. E., & Chidozie, F. (2020). International Law and Humanitarian Intervention in the Syrian Civil War: The Role of the United States. Journal Of SAGE, 5(8), 1-11.
    11. Reyes Parra, P. D. (2021). Self-Defence against Non-State Actors: Possibility or reality?. Journal of Revista Facultad de Jurisprudencia, 8(9), 151-176.
    12. Scharf, Michael P. (2013). Customary International Law in Times of Fundamental Change: Recognizing Grotian Moments, Cambridge University Press, 1-242.
    13. Scharf, Michael P. (2016). How the War Against ISIS Changed International Law. Case Western Reserve Journalof International Law, 6(47), 1-55.
    14. Scharf, M. P. (2023). Power Shift: The Return of the Uniting for Peace Resolution. Case Western Reserve Journalof International Law, 55(68), 1-36.
    15. Scharf, M. P., Sterio, M., & Williams, P. R. (2020). The Syrian Conflict’s Impact on International Law, Cambridge University Press, 1-244.
    16. Shiryaev, Y. (2015). The Right of Self-Defence under Article 51 of the UN Charter against the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant. Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag, 90(3/4), 245-282.
    17. Simpson, M., Adam R. G., Christopher A. Mouton & John P. Godges (2022). Road to Damascus: The Russian Air Campaign in Syria, 2015 to 2018, Rand Corporation, 1-104.
    18. Williams, Paul R., J. Trevor Ulbrick And Jonathan Worboys (2012). Preventing Mass Atrocity Crimes: The Responsibility to Protect and the Syria Crisis, Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 45(1 /2), 472-503.

     

    1. C) Websites
    2. Bonsey, N. (January 24, 2017). What's at Stake in the Syrian Peace Talks in Astana?. International Crisis Group, Available at: https://www.crisisgroup.org/middle-east-north-africa/eastern-mediterranean/syria/what-stake-syrian-peace-talks-astana
    3. Dehghanpisheh, B. (December 21, 2105). Iranian casualties rise in Syria as Revolutionary Guards ramp up role. Ruters, https://jp.reuters.com/article/mideast-crisis-syria-iran-guards-idUKKBN0U50MB20151222
    4. Hakimi, Monica(Apr 15, 2018). The Attack on Syria and the Contemporary Jus ad Bellum. EJIL Talk, https://www.ejiltalk.org/the-attack-on-syria-and-the-contemporary-jus-ad-bellum
    5. Kingsley, P. (2019). Who Are the Kurds, and Why Is Turkey Attacking Them in Syria?. The New York Times,https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/14/world/middleeast/the-kurds-facts-history.html
    6. Monaghan, C. (June 30, 2017). In Yemen and other conflict zones, hospitals remain a target. The Lancet, Available at: http://globalhealth.thelancet.com/2017/06/30/ yemen-and-other-conflict-zones-hospitals-remain-target.
    7. Pizzi, Michael (September 24, 2014). Despite questions over legality of US strikes in Syria, world stays quiet. Al-Jazeera, Available at: http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2014/9/24/legality-strikessyria.html
    8. Schmitt, M. (2014). Legitimacy versus Legality Redux: Arming the Syrian Rebels. journal of National Security law and Policy, 7(4), 139-159.

     

    References in Persian:

    - Articles

    1. Ahmadinejad, M., Metaji, M., & Amin al-Raaya, Y. (2016). Arming the Syrian opposition from the perspective of international law. Public Law Studies Quarterly, 46(4),  873-906 (In Persian).
    2. Aghamohammadi, E., Abdullahi, S. M. A., & Eslami Gilani M. S. (2018). Humanitarian intervention in international law with an emphasis on NATO's military intervention in Kosovo. War Historical Studies Quarterly, 2(5), 1-20 (In Persian).
    3. Akbarilalimi, M. (2016). Implementation of the right to self-determination, confrontation of human rights with the sovereignty of governments. Legal Journal of Justice, 80(96), 59-77 (In Persian).
    4. Bahmani-Qachar, M. A. (2012). Legal review of foreign interventions in Syria. Islamic World Strategic Studies Quarterly, 13, (50), 105-120 (In Persian).
    5. Parsamehar, M. A. & Mirmosavi, S. A. (2020). Resolving the issue of minorities in the light of the new approach to the right to self-determination. Public Law Studies Quarterly, 50(1), 373-399 (In Persian).
    6. Parveen, Khairale and Mohammad Sadegh Faqfouri Blandi (2012). "The implementation of the right of self-determination by nations: a case study of Syria. Quarterly of Islamic Human Rights Studies, 1(2), 37-70 (In Persian).
    7. Javid, M. J., & Mohammadi, A. (2016). Evaluation of the enforceability of Article 154 of the Constitution (JAA) in contemporary international law. Public Law Studies Quarterly, 46(1), 71-89 (In Persian).
    8. Dorj, H., & Masoudnia, H. (2019). Analysis of the approach and interests of the three countries of Iran, Turkey and Saudi Arabia towards the developments in Syria. Political Geography Research Quarterly, 4(15), 105-132 (In Persian).
    9. Rafii-Basiri, M., Javadani-Moghadam, M., & Kayani, D. (2021). Rereading the Paradox of Sovereignty and Intervention in Modern International Law (Case Study: Syria Crisis). International Studies Quarterly, 18(70), 223-243 (In Persian).
    10. Zargar, A., & Salimi, L. (2017). Russia and the fight against terrorism and extremism in the Caucasus: achievements and failures 2001-2015. bimonthly research in arts and humanities, 2(6), 107-120 (In Persian).
    11. Sajjadpour, Seyyed Mohammad Kazem Saeed Baghban Kandari (2018). Review of the United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding the Syrian crisis (2011 to 2017). Foreign Policy Quarterly, 32(2), 5-38 (In Persian).
    12. Seyed Salehi, M., & Jafari-Taheri, H. (2021). Examination of the concept of aggression in documents and international jurisprudence with an emphasis on Turkey's attack on Syria., Law Studies Quarterly, 6(15), 323-340 (In Persian).
    13. Alimohammadi, S. (2017). Examination of the legitimacy of Iran's military presence in the Syrian armed conflict in the light of the principles of international law. Islamic World Strategic Studies Quarterly, 18(70), 161-189 (In Persian).
    14. Gholam Alipour, Ali and Ali Ilkhanipour (2018). Political and Security Consequences of the Responsibility to Support Theory in Syria", Political Essays Quarterly, 8(4), 131-150 (In Persian).
    15. Ghasemi, G. A. (2017). Challenges of the principle of non-intervention and its place in international law. Afaq Security Quarterly, 9(33), 143-172 (In Persian).
    16. Ghanbari, P., & Farhadibabadi, H. (2021). Examination of the legal dimensions of Iran's presence in Syria from the perspective of international law. Legal Research Quarterly, 20(46), 283-302 (In Persian).
    17. Kadkhodaei, A. A., Sargaran, N., & Abedini, M. (2017). Analysis of the principle of non-indifference in the approach of the African Union. Public Law Studies Quarterly, 47(1), 75-95 (In Persian).
    18. Karamzadeh, S., & Alizadeh, M. (2020). Russia's intervention in the Syrian crisis and the principle of prohibition of intervention in civil wars. Public Law Studies Quarterly, 50(1), 99-115 (In Persian).
    19. Mobini, A., Mobini, J., & Askari, P. (2020). The rule against the use of force and attacks by the US and its allies on Syria during the years 2014 to 2018. Public Law Studies Quarterly, 50(1), 311-332 (In Persian).
    20. Mousavi Mirkalai, S. T. (2023). Beyond International Law: Arbitrary Use of Force in Syria. Judicial Law Perspectives Quarterly, 24(85), 169-200 (In Persian).
Public Law Studies Quarterly

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 22 September 2024
Files
History
  • Receive Date: 26 January 2022
  • Revise Date: 03 July 2022
  • Accept Date: 24 October 2022
Share
How to cite
Statistics