Document Type : Article

Authors

1 Associate Prof, Research Institute of Hawzah and University, Tehran, Iran

2 Ph.D. Student in Public Law, Shiraz university, Shiraz, Iran

10.22059/jplsq.2022.321285.2737

Abstract

many concepts, in the field of practical reason, must be re-read in relation to the meaning of freedom. One of these basic concepts is the notion of right, to which Kant's Copernican revolution has given it special prominence through a subjective approach. According to Kant, the essence of reason is freedom and the law of practical reason makes sense in relation to the original meaning of right can be understood only in the light of Kant's freedom. Kant considers the relationship between right and freedom to be profound, in that, right is a set of conditions under which the freedom of individuals is harmonized according to the general law of freedom; and on the other hand, freedom is the only inherent human right and in a negative sense means being free from any kind of dependence. In a positive sense, it means the power of the legislature relies on its essence, and in relation to the right, the main condition for the validity of the right is the preservation of freedom. just as freedom is an a priori concept, so are legal principles, and have no purpose other than to unite the free will of human beings.

Keywords

  1. English

    1. A) Books
    2. A Kant Dictionary, H. (1995). Blackwell, Blackwell Publishing.
    3. Kant, I. (1985). Critique of Practical Reason. trans, Lewis White Beck, Macmillan.
    4. Kant, I. (1909). Critique of Practical Reason. trans Thomas Kingsmill Abbott : London.
    5. Kant, I. (1992). Lectures on Logic. trans. J.Micheal Young, Cambridge UniversityPress.
    6. Kant, I., (2001). Religion and Rational Theology. trans. Allen Wood and George di Gio Vanni, Cambridge.
    7. The Cambridge Companion to Kant, Cambridge, 1992.

     

    1. B) Articls
    2. Beanwortung der Frage: Was ist Aufklarung: Kants Werke, Akademi Textausgabe, Berlin,Walter de Gruyter, 1968.

     

    References In Persian:

    1. A) Books
    2. Copleston, F. (1996). A History of Phlosophy (from Volf to Kant).Translated by Esmaeil Saadat and Manuchehr Bozorghmehr. Vol. 6, Tehran: Elmi Farhanghi press (In Persian).
    3. Goldman, L. (1974). The Phlosophy of the Enlightenment: The Christian Burgess and the Enlightenment. Translated by Mansooreh Kaviyani,Tehran: Noghreh press (In Persian).
    4. Jaspers, K. (1993). KANT. Translated by Mir Abdolhossein Naghib Zade. Tehran:Tahuri press (In Persian).
    5. Kant, E. (1990). Groundwork of the Metaphisics of Moral,Translated by Hamid Enayat and Ali Gheysari,Tehran: Kharazmi press (In Persian).
    6. Kant, E. (2013). Religion Within the boundary of Pur reason. Translate by Manuchehr Saneii Dareh Bidi.Tehran.Naghshoneghar press (In Persian).
    7. Kant, E.(2014) .The Philosophy of Law. Translated by Manuchehr Saneii Darre Bidi, Tehran: Naghshoneghar press (In Persian).
    8. Mojtahedi, K. (2011). Thoughts of Kant. Tehran:Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies (In Persian).
    9. Pincard T. (2015).TerryGerman phlosophy1. 860-1760: Legacy of idealism. Translated by Neda Gharooui. Tehran: Ghoghnus press (In Persian).
    10. Sanei Darre Bidi, M. (2005). The place of man in Kant thought. Tehran: Goghnus press (In Persian).
    11. Shojaee, M. (2012). Introduction to Historical Philosophy to the Enlightenment. Tehran: Elm press (In Persian).
    12. Todorov, T. (2008). The Spirit of the Enlightenment. Translated by Abdolvahhab Ahmadi,Tehran:Agah press (In Persian).
    13. Zaker Zade, A. (2009). German Idealism (from Volf to New followers of Kant). Abadan: Porsesh press (In Persian).

     

    1. B) Articles
    2. Foucaoult, M. (1984). What is Enlightenment?. Translated by Homayun Foladpur. Kelk Journal, 22, 67-58 (In Persian).
    3. Kant, E. (1784). An Answer to the Question :What is Enlightenment? Translated by Homayun Foladpur. Kelk Journal. 22, 48-57 (In Persian).