Document Type : Article
Author
Assistant Prof. Department of Public Law, Faculty of Law and Humanities, Islamic Azad University Shiraz Branch, Shiraz, Iran
Abstract
Legal systems use various methods to resolve their administrative disputes, and each of them follows a specific model for administrative adjudication depending on various factors. The special conditions of the country and its historical, political and social contexts determine the special features of its judicial system. The method of expressing the content in this article is descriptive and the purpose of the article is to introduce different models of adjudications without prioritizing a particular system. In this article, according to the criteria of the structure of the adjudication, the method of conducting the adjudication in the form of inquisitorial or adversarial, and open or closed judicial supervision, the four types of administrative adjudication have been identified. In the first model, the procedure is adversarial. Administrative agencies perform a combined function (administrative-judicial) and limited judicial review is applied in general courts. In the second model, adjudication is carried out by courts independent of administrative bodies and by adversarial method. Finally, closed judicial review is applied in general courts. In the third model, adjudication is conducted by special courts in a inquisitorial and open manner. And finally, the characteristic of the fourth model is open judicial review in general courts.
Keywords
- administrative Adjudication
- administrative tribunals
- inquisitorial adjudication
- adversarial adjudication
- judicial review.
Main Subjects
- English
- A) Books
- Asimow, M. (2019). Federal Administrative Adjudication Outside the Administrative Procedure Act. Washington, D.C.: Administrative Conference of the United States.
- Asimow, M.R. (2014). Inquisitorial Adjudication and Mass Justice in American Administrative Law. In Laverne Jacobs and Sasha Baglay, The Nature of Inquisitorial Processes in Administrative Regimes: Global Perspectives. Edited by Laverne Jacobs and Sasha Baglay. London: Routledge. 93-112. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2503177
- Asimow, M. & Lubbers, J. S. (2010). The Merits of ‘Merits’ Review: A Comparative Look at the Australian Administrative Appeals Tribunal. Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice. 28(2). https://ssrn.com/abstract=1904392
- Cane, P. (2016). Controlling Administrative Power: A Historical Comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Cane, P. (2009). Administrative Tribunals and Adjudication. Portland: Hart Publishing.
- Cane, P. (2008). Understanding Administrative Adjudication. In Administrative Law in a Changing State: Essays in Honour of Mark Aronson Hardcover. Edited by Linda P., Carol, H.& Michael, T. Portland: Hart Publishing, 273-299.
- Cane, P. (2010). Judicial Review and Merits Review: Comparing Administrative Adjudication by Courts and Tribunals. In Comparative Administrative Law. edited by Susan, R.A & Peter, L.L. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 426-448. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849808101.00036
- Ford, C. (2013). Dogs and Tails: Remedies in Administrative Law. In Administrative Law in Context .edited by Lorne, S. & Colleen, F. . Toronto: Emond Montgomery, https://commons.allard.ubc.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1129&context=fac_pubs
- Stebbings, C. (2009). Legal Foundations Of Tribunals In Nineteenth-Century England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Ushijma, H. (2009). Administrative Law and Judicialized Governance in Japan. In , Administraive Law and Governance in Asia. edited by Tom, G.& Albert H. Y. C., Oxfordshire: Rutledge, 81-100.
- B) Articles
- Antony, G. (2015). Administrative Justice in The United Kingdom. Italian Journal of Public Law, (7(1).
- Asimow, M. (2015). Five Models of Administrative Adjudication. American Journal of Comparative Law, (63), https://ssrn.com/abstract=2502210 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2502210
- Asimow, M., & Yoav, D. (2016). Open and Closed Judicial Review of Agency Action, The American Journal of Comparative Law, 64(3).
- Cui, W., Cheng, J. & Wiesner, D. (2018). Judicial Review of Government Actions in China. Journal of Comparative Law, 17(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3228175
- Elliott, M. (2012). Ombudsman, Tribunals, Inquiries: Re-Fashioning Accountability beyond the courts. University of Cambridge Faculty of Law Research Paper, (21). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2133879.
- Huang, C. Y. & Law, D.S. (2014) . Proportionality Review of Administrative Action in Japan, Korea, Taiwan, & China. Legal Studies Research Paper Series, 14-08-07.https://ssrn.com/abstract=2496220
- Perlingeiro, R. (2016). Contemporary Challenges In Latin American Administrative Justice .BRICS Law Journal, 3(2), 21-56.
- Verbic, F. (2016). An Overview Of Administrative Justice In Argentina. BRICS law Journal, 3(2), 57-66.
- Xiao, S. & Lin, Y. (2022). Judicial Review of Administrative Rules in China: Incremental Expansion of Judicial Power. Journal of Comparative Law, 17(2), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4296692
Electronic Sources
- Administrative Justice in Europe-Report For France-. https://www.aca-europe.eu/en/eurtour/i/countries/france/france_en.pdf
- Administrative Justice in Europe ,Report for the United Kingdom. https://www.acaeurope.eu/en/eurtour/i/countries/unitedkingdom/unitedkingdom_en.pdf
- Gunther, C. (2016). Administrative Justice In Europe, Report For Germany. https://www.aca-europe.eu/en/eurtour/i/countries/germany/germany_en.pdf
- Thomas, R. (2012). Adversarial v Inquisitorial to Active, Enabling, and Investigative: Developments in UK Administrative Tribunals. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2144457
- Usui, M. (2013). Administrative Justice In Japan. presented at a CIPL and AIAL Seminar, ANU College of Law. https://www6.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/AIAdminLawF/2014/9.pdf
References In Persian:
- A) Books
- Abbasi, B. (2016). Comparative Administrative Law. Tehran: Dadgostar (In Persian).
- Ayene Negini, H., & Abrishmi Rad, M. A.. (2021). Administrative procedure (judicial course). Tehran: Majd Publications (In Persian).
- Fathi, Y. (2020). The optimal system of proceedings in administrative courts: a comparative study with an emphasis on Iranian authorities. Tehran: Khorsandy Pulications (In Persian).
- Hadavand, M., & Aghaei Touq, M. (2010). Administrative tribunals in the Light of fair trial Principles (Iranian Law in Comparative perspective). Tehran: Khorsandi Publications (In Persian).
- Imami, M., & Osovar Sangari, K. (2012). Administrative Law. Vol.2, Tehran: Mizan (In Persian).
- Kunnecke, M. (2017).Comparative Administrative Law: Tradition And Change In Administrative Law Of The United Kingdom and Germany. translated by Khadijeh, S. & Nagin, S. B.. Tehran: Majd Publications (In Persian).
- Ostovar Sangari, K. (2023). Administrative Procedure Law. Tehran: Datik Pulications (In Persian).
- Rezaizadeh, M. J. (2021). Administrative Acts. Tehran: Majd Publications (In Persian).
- Shami, M. (2014). Law of Administrative Contracts. Tehran: Jungle Publications (In Persian).
- Tabatabai Motmani, M. (2005). Administrative Law. Tehran:Samt Publications (In Persian).
- B) Articles
- Barker, M., & Nagel, A. (2015). The principle of unreasonableness: as a Ground of Judicial Review in the Australian Legal System. Translated by Khadijeh S.. Ray Journal, 4(10).117-132. 10.22106/jcr.2015.28518 (In Persian).
- Gorgi Azandriani, A. A. & Eskandari, M. (2020). Criteria for Determining the Competence of the Administrative Judge in the German Legal System. Administrative Law. 7( 22).221-244. 10.29252/qjal.7.22.221 (In Persian).
- Mohseni, H. (2007). Civil Justice Systems. Private Law Studies Quarterl. 37(1). 81-115. 20.1001.1.25885618.1386.37.1.4.4 (In Persian).
- Ostovar Sangari, K. (2020). Essence of administrative proceedings in Iran: proceedings in the administration or proceedings on the administration.The Journal of Modern Administrative Law Research. 2(4), 135-159. 10.22034/mral.2020.139000.1069 (In Persian).
- Shojaeian, K. (2019). Changes of Ground of Reasonableness in USA Judicial Review. Public Law Research. 20(61), 235-259. https://doi.org/10.22054/qjpl.2018.25258.1622 (In Persian).
- Yavari, A. (2009). Judicial Review on Administrative Decisions in Germany. Law and Interest, 2(5), 129-150 (In Persian).
- Zarei, M. H. & Mohsenzadeh, A. Law of evidence in administrative proceeding. (2016). The Quarterly Journal of Judicial Law Views, 20(72), 65-92 (In Persian).
)