Public Law Studies Quarterly

The Position of Law in Limiting Citizens’ Right to Economic Liberty

Document Type : Article

Authors

Atena Markazi 1
Seyed mojtaba Vaezi 2
Kourosh Ostovar Sangari 3

1 PhD student in Public Law, Faculty of Law and Humanities, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad ‎University of Shiraz, Shiraz, Iran

2 Associate Prof, Department of Public and International Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, ‎University of Shiraz, Shiraz, Iran‎

3 Assistant Prof. of Public Law, Faculty of Law and Humanities, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad ‎University of Shiraz, Shiraz, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22059/jplsq.2023.335416.2964
Abstract
The definition and limitation of state authority are foundational to proposing and promoting the rule of law, which aims to protect the liberties and rights of citizens. However, historical events and experiences have given rise to theories that justify state intervention, particularly in the economic sphere, to the extent that the rule of law has practically transformed into rule by law. Due to the complex and dynamic nature of market relations and subjects, it is impossible to predict, regulate, and set goals for the market effectively. Furthermore, the collection of personal information and violations of privacy are often necessary for regulation. The enforcement of these rules typically involves state imposition, which conflicts with the right to economic liberty. All forms of liberty are embedded in economic liberty, a concept that pragmatically exists in sensory order. The law, as defined within the philosophy of law and legislation, is often inefficient in addressing these matters. In fact, the rule of law is one of the most important indicators for measuring economic liberty, which encompasses private property, agreements, contracts, and the establishment of an impartial and independent judicial institution. However, legislation on various economic subjects can lead to limitations on economic liberty.

Keywords

freedom of choice
rule of ‎law
efficiency
state ‎intervention
regulation.‎
Subjects

  1. English

    1. A) Books
    2. Bavetta, S., & Navarra, P. (2012). The Economics of Freedom, Theory, Measurement, and Policy Implications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    3. Daintith, T. (2017). The Constitutional Protection of Economic Rights. New York: Bejing Roundtable.
    4. Grubel, H. (2015). Determinants of Economic Freedom, Theory and Empirical Evidence. Vancouver: Fraser Institute
    5. L, J. (2013). Private Property and Constitution. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
    6. Sandefur, Timothy. (2016). The right to earn a living. Washington, D.C: Cato Institute.
    7. Siegan, H. B. (2012). Economic liberties and Constitution. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
    8. Stankov, P. (2017). Economic Freedom and Welfare Before and After Crisis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
    9. Miller, T., & Kim, A. B. )2016). the Index of Economic Freedom. Washington, D.C: Heritage Foundation.
    10. Vegner, G. (2018). The Impact of Economic Freedom on State Legitimacy. Erfurt: Springer Gabler.
    11. Von Mises, L. (1998). Human Action. Alabama: Ludwig von Mises Institute.

     

    1. B) Articles
    2. Dreher, A., & Gassebner, M., & Siemers , Lars-H. R. (2012). Globalization, Economic Freedom and Human Rights. The Journal of Conflict Resolution. 56, 516-546. https://cooperative-individualism.org/dreher-axel_globalization-economic-freedom-and-human-rights-2012-jun.pdf.

     

    References In Persian:

    1. A) Books
    2. Ostovar Sangari, K. (2019). Legal State. Tehran: Mizan (In Persian).
    3. Rasekh, M. (1393). Right and Interests. 2 Vol. Tehran: Ney (In Persian).
    4. Rothbard, Murray (2013) Man, Economy and State. Translated by Matin Pedram, Tehran: Dnyaye Eghtesad (In Persian).
    5. Zoller, Elisabeth (2017) An Introduction to Public Law . Translated by Mojtaba Vaezi, Tehran: Jangal (In Persian).
    6. Ghaninezhad, Musa (2012). Liberalization and Economic Function. Tehran: Donyaye Eghtesad (In Persian).
    7. Ghaninezhad, M. (1999). The Idea of Freedom. Tehran: Tarh-e No (In Persian).
    8. Ghaninezhad, M.; Tabibian, Mohammad; Abbasi Ali Kamar, Hosein (1999). Civil Society, Liberty, Economics and Politics. Tehran: Tarh-e No (In Persian).
    9. Friedman, M., & Friedman, R, D. (2021), Free to Choose. Translated by Hossein Hakimzadeh. Tehran: Foroozan (In Persian).
    10. Friedman, Milton (2001), Capitalism and Freedom. Translated by Gholam Reza Rashidi. Tehran: Ney (In Persian).
    11. Freidrich, A. H. (2001). Law, Legislation and Liberty a New Statement of the Liberal Principle of Justice and Political Economy. Translated by Mahshid Moayeri & Mosa Ghaninizhad. Vol 1. Tehran: Tarh-e No (In Persian).
    12. Freidrich, A. H. (2001). Law, Legislation and Liberty a New Statement of the Liberal Principle of Justice and Political Economy. Translated by Mahshid Moayeri & Mosa Ghaninizhad. Vol 2. Tehran: Donyaye Eghtesad (In Persian).
    13. Freidrich, A. H. (2001). Law, Legislation and Liberty a New Statement of the Liberal Principle of Justice and Political Economy. Translated by Mahshid Moayeri & Mosa Ghaninizhad. Vol 3. Tehran: Donyaye Eghtesad (In Persian).
    14. Freidrich, A. H. (2011). The Road to Serfdom. Translated by Hamid Padash. Tehran: Negah Moaser (In Persian).
    15. Von Mises, L. (2018). Economic Policy. Translated by Mahmood Sadri. Tehran: Donyaye Eghtesad (In Persian).
    16. Von Mises, L. (2021). Liberalisim. Translated by Mehdi Tadayyoni, Tehran: Sales (In Persian).
    17. Yadipour, M. (2010). Law and Economy. Tehran: Imam Sadegh (In Persian).
    18. Yusefi, M. G. (2013). Basic Institutions of Market. Tehran: Nahadgara (In Persian).

     

    1. B) Articles
    2. Saneei, M., & Parvin, K. (2020). Legal Analysis of Governments Intervention or Non-Intervention in Development System: An Approach from Public Economic Law. Public Law Studies Quarterly, (1), 229-254. https://doi.org/22059/jplsq.2019.259161.1822 (In Persian).
    3. Tohidfam, M. (2012) Necessity of Freedom and the Legal Government in Hayek's Thought. Research Letter of International Relations, (18), 47-73 (In Persian).
    4. Markaz malmiri, A., & Rasekh, M. (2012). Statement of Principles of legislative procedures. Legal Research Quarterly, (9), 53-99 (In Persian).
    5. Tajarlou, R., & Karbasion, M. (2017). Efficiency and its Obstacle to Competition law in Iran. Public Law Studies Quarterly, (4), 979-994.

    doi.org/10.22059/jplsq.2017.215679.1350 (In Persian).

    1. Ghasemi, H. (2015). Economic Law. Legal Research Quarterly, (7), 31-56 (In Persian).
    2. Lotfi, Hasan (2018). Foundation for Government Intervention in Contracts: Corrective Justice or Distributive Justice. Public Law Studies Quarterly, (3), 547-567. https://doi.org/10.22059/jplsq.2018.240679.1576 (In Persian).
    3. Markaz malmiri, A., & Baharestanfar, M. R. (2011). The Assessment of Economic, Social and Cultural Development Program Law in the Light of Good Law Indexes. Comparative Iranian and International legal Research, (12), 9-52 (In Persian).
    4. Naeemi, S. M., & Rasekh, M. (2013). Concept of “Economic Man” in Economic Approach to Law: An Explanation and a Critique. Journal Encyclopedia of Economic Law, (2), 134-168.22067/le.v19i2.27379 (In Persian).
    5. Vakilian, H., & Markaz Malmiri, A. (2016). Legisprudence: in Quest of Enhancing the Quality of Legislation. Public Law Researsh, (51), 24-59 (In Persian).
Public Law Studies Quarterly
Volume 55, Issue 1 - Serial Number 41
Spring 2025
Spring 2025
Pages 125-149

  • Receive Date 15 December 2021
  • Revise Date 13 January 2023
  • Accept Date 26 June 2023

Home

Journal Process Ethics

Peer Review Process

Submission

Indexing and Abstracting

Contact Us