English

1. A) Books
2. Aust, A. (2007). Modern Treaty Law and Practice. United States of America, Cambridge University press, Second Edition.
3. Crawford, J. (2012). Brownlie's Principles of Public International Law. London:Oxford University Press, 8^th
4. Djeffal, C. (2016). Static and Evolutive Treaty Interpretation. United Kingdom Cambridge University Press.
5. Dorr, O., & schmalenbach, K. (2018). Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. Germany, Springer, second edition.
6. Fitzmaurice, M., & Elias, (2005). Contemporary Issues in the Law of Treaties. Netherlands: Eleven International Publishing.
7. Gardiner, R. (2015). Treaty Interpretation. United Kingdom, Oxford University Press. second edition.
8. Kolb, R. (2016). The Law of Treaties. United Kingdom, Edward Elgar Publishing.
9. Linderfalk, u. (2007). On the Interpretation of Treaties, The Modern International Law as Expressed in the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. Netherlands, Springer.
10. Lo, C.F. (2017). Treaty Interpretation under the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. Singapore, Springer.
11. Villiger, M. E. (2009). Commentary on the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, Netherlands. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

1. B) Articles
2. Gardiner, R. (2018). Characteristics of the Vienna Convention Rules on Treaty Interpretation, in: Micheal j. Bowman and Dino Kritsiotis (eds.). Conceptual and Contextual Perspectives on the Modern Law of Treaties, Cambridge University Press, 335-362.
3. Klabbers, J. (2010). Virtuous Interpretation, in: Malgosia Fitzmaurice, Olufemi Elias and Panos Merkouris (eds). treaty interpretation and the Vienna convention on the law of treatiea: 30 years on, Netherlands, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 17-38.
4. Linderfalk, Ulf (2015). Is Treaty Interpretation an Art or a Science?. International Law and Rational Decision Making the European journal of International Law, 26(1), 169-189.
5. Merkouris, P. (2017). Interpreting the Customary Rules on Interpretation. International Community Law, review, 19, 126-155.
6. Pullkowski, D. (2019). Lex Specialis Derogate Legi Generali/Genralia Specialibus Non Derogant, in: Joseph Klingler, Yuri Parkhomenko and Constantionos Salonidis (eds.), Between the Lines of the Vienna Convention? United Kingdom, Wolters Kluwer, 161-196.
7. Sbolci, L. (2011). Supplementary Means of Interpretation, in: Enzo Cannizzaro (ed.). the Law of Treaties beyond the Vienna Convention, Oxford University Press, 145-163.

1. C) Documents
2. International Law Commission, A/CN.4/167 and Add.1-3, Third Report on the Law of Treaties, by Sir Humphrey Waldock, Special Rapporteur, Extract from the Yearbook of the International Law Commission, 1964, vol. II.
3. International Law Commission, Yearbook of the ILC, A/CN.4/SER. A/1966/Add. 1, Vol. II, p. 223.
4. Statute of the International Court of Justice (ICJ).
5. Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties Vienna, (Adopted 23 May 1969, Entered into force, 27 January 1980).

1. D) Cases
2. Anglo-Iranian Oil co. case, (Jurisdiction), (United Kingdom v. Iran), Judgment of July 22^nd, 1952: I.C.J. Reports 1952, p. 93.
3. Application of the International Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Racial Discrimination, (Qatar v. United Arab Emirates), preliminary objections, Judgment I.C.J. Reports 2021, p. 71.
4. Application of the International Convection on the Elimination of all Forms of Racial Discrimination (Georgia v. Russian federation), Preliminary Objections, I.C.J Reports 2011, p. 70.
5. Cf WTO Appellate Body EC – Chicken Cuts WT/DS269/AB/R, (2005).
6. Admission of a State to the United Nations (Charter, Art. 4), Advisory Opinion: I.C.J. Reports 1948, p. 57.
7. Fisheries Jurisdiction, (Spain v. Canada), Jurisdiction of the Court, Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1998, p. 432.
8. LaGrand (Germany v. United States of America), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 2001, p. 466.
9. Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports 1996, p. 226.
10. Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America), Preliminary Objection, Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1996, p. 803.
11. Territorial Dispute (Libyan Arab Jamahiriya v. Chad), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1994, p. 6.
12. The Canadian Cattlemen for Fair Trade (CCFT) v. the United States of America, UNCITRAL, Award on Jurisdiction of 28 January 2008.
13. The Case of the S.S. “Lotus”, (France v. Turkey), Judgment No. 9, PCIJ, Series A. No. 10, September 7^th, 1927.
14. WTO Appellate Body US – Gambling WT/DS285/AB/R, (2005).
15. WTO Panel Chile – Price Band System WT/DS207/R, (2002).

References In Persian:

1. A) Books
2. Falsafi, H. (2016). International Law of Treaties. Tehran: Farhang Nashrenow, 5^th Ed (In Persian).
3. Rezadoust, V. (2022). International Court of Justice. Tehran: Negahemoaser (In Persian).
4. Ziai Bigdeli, M. R. (2016). Law of International Treaties. Tehran: Canjedanesh Publications (In Persian).

1. B) Articles
2. Mohebi, M,, & Rezadoust, V. (2016). Evolutive Interpretation of Treaties in International Law in the Light of Disbute Regarding Navigational and Related Rights Case (CostaRica v. Nicaragua), International Law Review, (53), 9-30 (In Persian).
3. Sadat Akhavi, S. A. (2015). The Role of Subsequent Practice of States in the Interpretation of Treaties: The Judgment of the International Court of Justice in the “Application of the Interim Accord of 13 September 1995” Case, Public Law Studies Quarterly, (45), 3-18 (In Persian).
4. Shahbazi, A., & Ashrafi, K, (2021). Investigating the Legitimacy of the suspension of Obligations Based on Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action by Iran Using Hermeneutics of Interpretation, Journal of Legal Research, (44), 37-59 (In Persian).
5. Zamani, S. G., & Shiralizadeh, A. (2019). The Principles and Procedure of Interpretation of Investment Treaties by Arbitral Tribunals and Priority of International Law over Domestic Law. The Judiciary Law Journal, (105), 111-136 (In Persian).