1 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Law, College of Farabi, University of Tehran

2 Ph.D. Student in International Law, Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, University of Tehran, Ira


International law reviews the origins of the rules, institutions and practices that international law based on. That’s why "Theory" in law is able to give legitimacy to certain procedures and rule. From this standpoint, the "Liberal Theory of International Law" has an important place in international law. Confirmed by various studies, this theory plays an important role in forming "Peaceful" approach to international law and set aside classical approaches that recognized nothing butt "Legitimacy of War". Nevertheless, the core elements of this theory, reveals the fact that not only the liberal theory of international law helps to achieve the peaceful approach in international law, but also helps to justify use of force. This article studies the dualities and contradictions in the context of liberal theory of international law.


الف) فارسی
آربلاستر، آنتونی، (1377). لیبرالیسم غرب: ظهور و سقوط، ترجمۀ عباس مخبر، تهران، نشر مرکز.
آرنت، هانا، (1388). توتالیتاریسم، ترجمۀ محسن ثلاثی، تهران، نشر ثالث.
باقری، محمود، (1388). مکاتب فلسفی در حقوق بین‌الملل، تهران، نشر میزان.
بشیریه، حسین، (1390). تاریخ اندیشه‌های قرن بیستم: لیبرالیسم و محافظه‌کاری، تهران، نشر نی.
بیکس، برایان، (1389). فرهنگ نظریه‌های حقوقی، ترجمۀ محمد راسخ، تهران، نشر نی.
تسون، فرناندو، (1388). فلسفۀ حقوق بین‌الملل، ترجمۀ محسن محبی، تهران، انتشارات شهر دانش.
دیوتیاک، ریچارد و دردیان، جیمز، (1380). نظریۀ انتقادی، پست مدرنیسم، نظریۀ مجازی در روابط بین‌الملل، ترجمۀ حسین سلیمی، تهران، نشر گام نو.
ژانرو، مونیک شمیلیه، (1382). بشریت و حاکمیت‌ها: سیری در حقوق بین‌الملل، ترجمۀ مرتضی کلانتریان، تهران، انتشارت آگه.
فوکو، میشل، (1389). تولد زیست‌سیاست، درس گفتارهای کلژ دو فرانس، 1978-1979، ترجمۀ رضا نجف‌زاده،  تهران، نشر نی.
کانت، ایمانوئل، (1377). فلسفۀ حقوق، ترجمۀ منوچهر صانعی دره‌بیدی، تهران، نشر نقش و نگار.
کریمی، سیامک، (1393). حقوق بین‌الملل پس از 11 سپتامبر، تهران، انتشارات طلیعۀ ظهور.
وکیل، امیرساعد و همکاران، (1389). مروری بر مکاتب فلسفی حقوق بین‌الملل، تهران، نشر میزان.
ب) انگلیسی
A) Book:
- Finnis, John (2011), Natural Law and Natural Rights, New York, Oxford University Press.
- Fukuyama, Francis (1992), The End of History and the Last Man, New York, The Free Press.
- Griffin, James (2008), On Human Rights, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
- Hammer, Leonard (2007), Focouldian Approach to International Law: Descriptive Thoughts For Normative Issues, London, Ashgate.
- Kant, Immanuel (1917), Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Essay, Translated with Introduction and Noted: M. Campbell Smith, New York, The Macmillan Company.
- Keohane, Robert Owen; Nye, Joseph S (2011), Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition, London, Longman Publishing Group.
- Nicolacopoulos, Toula (2008), The Radical Critique of Liberalism: in Memory of a Vision, Mellbourne, re press.
- Owen, John M (1997), Liberal Peace Liberal War: American Politics and International Security, New York, Cornell University Press.
- Rawls, John (2001), The Law of People: withThe Idea of Public Reason Revisited, London, Harvard University Press.
- Rawls, John (2013), Political Liberalism: Expanded Edition, New York, Colombia University Press.
B) Article:
- Alvare, Joze (2001), Do liberal state behave better? A critique of slaughter`s Liberal theory, Ejil, vol 12(2), pp 183-246.
- Bing, Liang (2011), Liberal Theory of International Law and its Function in International Public Law, US-China Law Review, Vol 8, pp 1045-1052.
- Buchanan, Allen; Keohane, Robert O (2004), The Preventive Use of Force: A Cosmopolitan Institutional Proposal, Ethics and International Affairs, Vol 18 (1), pp. 1–22.
- Capps, Patrick (2001), The Kantian Project in Modern International Theory, Ejil, Vol 12, pp 1003-1025.
- Doyle, Michael W (1986), Liberalism and World Politics, American Political Science Review, Vol 80(4), pp 1151-1169.
- Foweraker, Joe; Krznaric, Roman (2000), Measuring Liberal Democratic Performance: an Empirical and Conceptual Critique, Political Studies, Vol 48, pp 759–787.
- Hart, H.L.A (1958), Positivism and the Separation of Law and Moral, Harvard Law Review, Vol 71, No 4.
- Lavy, Jack S (1989), Domestic politics and war, in Robert I. Rotberg and et al, The Origin and Prevention of Major Wars, New York, Cambridge University Press, 1989.
- Newbrander, David R (2012), Liberal Peace: A Dyad of Democracy and Economic Interdependence, Grounded in Agent Desires, The Monitor, pp 34-49.
- Parekh, Serena (2004), A meaningful place in the world: Hannah Arendt on the nature of human rights, Journal of Human Rights, Vol 3(1), pp 41-52.
- Reus-Smit, Christian (2005), Liberal Hierarchy and the Licence to Use force, Review of International Studies, Vol 31, pp 71–92.
- Riley, Patrick (1979), Federalism in Kant’s Political Philosophy, Publius, Vol 9, No 4, pp 43-64.
- Saunders, Elizabeth N (2006), Setting Boundaries: Can International Society Exclude “Rogue States’’?, International Studies Review, Vol 8, pp 23–53 .
- Slaughter, Anne Marie (1995), International Law in a World of Liberal States, Ejil, Vol 6, pp:503-538.
- Simpson, J. Gerry (1994), Imagined Consent: Democratic Liberalism in International Legal Theory, Australian Year Book of International Law, pp 103-128.
- Spencer, Philip (2006), From Rosa Luxemburg to Hannah Arendt: Socialism, Barbarism and the Extermination Camps, The European Legacy, Vol 11, No 5, pp 527-540.
- Teson, Fernando R.,(2001), The Liberal Case for Humanitarian Intervention, FSU College of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 39,pp:1-55. Available at: (last seen: 2 March 2015.)
- Walker, Thomas C (2008), Two Faces of Liberalism: Kant, Paine, and the Question of Intervention, International Studies Quarterly, Vol 52, pp 449–468.
- Wills, Joe (2014), The World Turned Upside Down? Neo-Liberalism, Socioeconomic Rights, and Hegemony, Leiden Journal of International Law,Vol  27, pp 11–35.
- Vatter, Miguel (2006), Natality and Biopolitics in Hannah Arendt, revista de ciencia poLítica, Vol 26(2), pp 137 - 159.
ICJ Case Concerning East Timor, Advisory Opinion of 30 June 1995.
ICJ, Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, 2004.
ICJ, Case concerning Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America) 1986.