Document Type : Article

Author

Associate Professor of International Law, International Law Group, School of National Security, ‎Supreme National Defense University, Tehran, Iran‎

Abstract

The cyberspace is a human ecosystem that is extremely complex. In such a space different paradigms, approaches and methods of regulation are possible. The regulatory paradigms of the cyberspace are based on two basic approaches, namely: cyber paternalism and cyber libertarianism. Under these two paradigms, different models for regulating the relationships of the cyberspace actors exist. This paper seeks to answer the fundamental questions of how law-making can take place in the dynamic, complex, and networked environments of the cyberspace? And which model can be applied as a desirable framework for regulating the cyberspace? The present study, which uses a comparative and descriptive method, evaluates different models of cyberspace regulation in order to obtain the desired model for Iran. The results show that due to the uncertainty and complexity of the cyberspace, a dynamic and flexible regulatory framework should be considered as a suitable regulatory model for the cyber environment both nationally and internationally. While Iran's approach to regulating the cyberspace at the national level should be based on the paternalistic paradigm, its approach at the international level should follow libertarianism.

Keywords

Main Subjects

  1. English

    1. A) Books
    2. Ashby, W.Ross, Ashby, W Ross(1957). Introduction to Cybernetics. Science Editions , John Wiley Sons Inc , (London: Chapman & Hall).
    3. Austin,John (1986). Lectures on Jurisprudence, 3rd edn (London: John Murray), Vol. I, Lecture I.
    4. Baldwin, R, & Cave, M. (1999). Understanding Regulation Theory, Strategy, and Practice. Oxford University Press (Oxford).
    5. Barlow, John.P, A.(1996) Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace, Davos: Electronic Frontier Foundation.
    6. Easterbrook, F. (1996). Cyberspace and the Law of the Horse. University of Chicago Legal Forum.
    7. Lessig, L. (2000). The Code in Law, and the Law in Code(New York: Basic Books).
    8. Lessig, L. (1999). Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace, (New York: Basic Books).
    9. Loader, B. D. (2010). The Governance of Cyberspace, The Governance of Cyberspace.
    10. Lipton, J. D. (2014). Cyberlaw 2.0, Akron Law Publications.
    11. Murray, Andrew (2006). The Regulation of Cyberspace: Control in the Online Environment, London: Routledge-Cavandish.
    12. Murray, A.(2010). Information Technology Law: The Law and Society. (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
    13. Hart, H. (1994). The Concept of Law. 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
    14. Raz, J. (2009). The Authority of Law. 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
    15. Reed, C. (2012). Making Laws for Cyberspace. British Library Cataloguing in publication Data.
    16. Tikk, E. (2011). Comprehensive Legal Approach to Cyber Security. (University of Tartu)
    17. Wamala, F. (2011). ITU National Cybersecurity Strategy Guide. PHD theses, CISSP.
    18. Elsner G., & Natarajan, A. (2020). Regulating the Cyberspace: Perspectives from Asia.Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung.

     

    1. B) Articles
    2. Benkler, Y. (2000). From Consumers to Users: Shifting the Deeper Structures of Regulation toward Sustainable Commons and User Access.Federal Communications Law Journal, 52(3), 561–579.
    3. Johnson, D.R., & David G. Post (1996). Law And Borders-The Rise of Law in Cyberspace. Stanford Law Review..
    4. Klaić, A., & Perešin, A.(2016). The Impact of the National Information Security Regulation Framework on Cyber Security in Global Environment. An International Journal, 34(1), 37-55.
    5. Lessig, L. (1999). The Law of the Horse: What Cyberlaw Might Teach. Harvard Law Review, 113.
    6. Millwood-hargrave, M. (2007). report for Working group 3 of the Conference of Experts for European Media policy, More Trust in Content – The potential of Co- and Self-regulation in Digital Media. 60-61.
    7. Murray, A.(2002). and Colin Scott, "Controlling the New Media: Hybrid Responses to New Forms of Power. The Modern Law Review, 65(4,) 491–516.
    8. Porter, M. E., & Claas van der Linde (1995). The relationship between environmental goals and industrial competitive. The journal of Economic Perspective, 9(4), 97-115.
    9. Tyler, T. R. ,& Darley, J.M. (2000). Building a Law-abiding Society: Taking Public Views about Morality and the Legitimacy of Legal Authorities into Account when Formulating Substantive Law.28 Hofstra Law Review, 707, 713:
    10. Wingfield, T. C., & Tikk, E. (2010). Frameworks for International Cyber Security: The Cube, the Pyramid, and the Screen. 2nd International Conference on Cyber Conflict, June, 16–22.
    11. Tan, Eugene EG and Benjamin Ang(2023). ASEAN Ambiguity on International Law and Norms for Cyberspace. Balfic Yearbook of Internafional, 133-162.
    12. Ashwin, s. (2022). Cyberspace Regulatory Models and their Feasibility. Enhelions blogs, 3-18.

     

    References in Persian:

    1. A) Books
    2. Andrew, M. (2018). Regulation of cyberspace: control in the online environment. translator: Mohammad Reza Hosseini and Naseeb Elah Dosti Mutlaq, Tehran: Legal Publications (In Persian).
    3. Gholami, R. (2018). The Hexagonal Models of Governance in Cyberspace. Tehran: National Center of Cyberspace (In Persian).
    4. Mehdizadeh, S. M. (2015). Media theories, popular ideas and critical views, Tehran: Hamshahri Publishing House (In Persian).
    5. Mirzapour, H. (2018). Challenges of governance and regulation of virtual space in the Iran. Tehran: Sharif governance think tank (In Persian).

     

    1. B) Articles
    2. Alwani, S. M., Khanfir, H., & Haji Malamirzaei, H. (2013). Development of the Iran's Cyberspace policy model. Social and Cultural Strategy Quarterly, 4(13), 75-100 (In Persian).
    3. Hafez Nia, M. R. (2013). Conceptualization of Geopolitics of the Internet and Cyberspace. International Scientific-Research Quarterly of Geopolitics, 7(21), Tehran: Iran’s Geopolitical Association, 1-13 (In Persian).
    4. Hedavand, M. (2016). entrance on social regulation. Public Law Quarterly, 2, 48-63 (In Persian).
    5. Kian Khah, E. (2017). Strategic challenges of governance with the expansion of cyberspace. Scientific Quarterly of National Security, 9(34) (In Persian).
    6. Kiankhah, E. (2016). Explaining the nature and components of cyber space based on Islamic thinking. PhD thesis, Tehran: National Defense University (In Persian).
    7. Mahmoudi Maimand, M.; Shayan, A. and Kalantari, N. (2012). The Framework for Policy Development of Information and Communication Technology in Iran. Scientific Research Quarterly Journal of Iran Science and Information Technology Institute, 3(27), 617-639 (In Persian).
    8. Yavari, A. (2013). Introduction to the concept of legal regulation. Comparative Law Studies Quarterly, 5(2), 629-647 (In Persian).
    9. Ziyai, S. Y., & Shakibnejad, E. (2016). Legislation in cyber space: the approach of International law and Iran’s law. International Law Journal, 34(57), 227-247 (In Persian).