Public Law Studies Quarterly

Explaining the Status of Development Planning in the Legal System of the Islamic Republic of Iran

Document Type : Article

Author

Mahdie Saneei

Department of Financial – Economic law, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22059/jplsq.2021.321154.2735
Abstract
Development law is a branche of law that facilitates human achievement of basic needs and is of interest to various nations. Achieving development requires planning that takes place in the form of a planning system. There are various models for achieving development through which governments exercise sovereignty and public authority, based on the ideology, ideals, principles and goals of society. Based on the constitution and other upstream instruments, governments plan for development according to a purposeful element. Using a descriptive-analytical method, this paper seeks to explain the legal status of development planning in the Iranian legal system and identifies different patterns of development and finally answers the question which development modell matches the legal system of the Islamic Republic of Iran? The findings of this study show that development planning in Iran is not consistent with current economic models and by explaining the legal system of development planning in Iran, an appropriate model will be proposed.

Keywords

development pattern
development planning
development law
planning system
Subjects

  1. English

    1. A) Books
    2. Hall, p. (2002). Urban and Regional Planning. 4th ed, London, Routledge.
    3. Ikelegbe, A. O. (2006). Public Policy Analysis: Concept, Issues and Cases. Lagos: Imprint Services.
    4. Kingsbury, R., Mckay, John and Hunt (2004). key Issue in Development . (New York: Palgrave.
    5. Krugman, P., & Obstfeld, M. (2010). International Economics, Theory and Policy, Pearson Series in Economics. 9th
    6. Simon, W. (2006). Toyota jurisprudence: legal theory and rolling rule regimes. In Law and New Governance in the EU and the US, eds.de Burca and J Scott. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
    7. Todar M., & Smith, S. (2012). Economic Development, 11th ed Boston, Mass; Addision-Wesely.

     

    1. B) Article
    2. Allmendinger, P. (2002). Towards a post-positivist typology of planning theory. Planning theory, 1(1), 50-85.
    3. Anderson, E. (2000). Beyond Homo Economicus: New Developments in Theories of Social Norms. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 29(2), 49-73.
    4. Brion, D., J .(2000), Norms and Values in Law and Economics. in Bouckaert. Boudwijn and De Gerrit (eds), Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, Chentelham:Edward Elgar, 1, 230-268.
    5. Black, J. (2008). Decentering Regulation: Understanding the Role of Regulation and Self-Regulation in a Post-Regulatory World, Current legal Problems, 54, 150-189.
    6. Colin, H. (2004). Re-stating Politics Re-Politicizing the state. Neoliberalism Issue of the Political Quarterly, 75, 50-95.
    7. Hobbes, T. (2016). Liberal Neutrality. planning theory, 2(1), 101-146.
    8. Klase,Matthias & Esther-Mirjam, S. (2005). Conceptual History of the Emergence of Bounded Rationality. History of Political Economy, 37(1), 120-158.
    9. Lowndes,V. (2015). Institutionalism, Theory in Political Science. Perspective on Politics 2nd Edition, 3, 48-83.
    10. North Douglass C., Chrysostomos Mantzavinos and Syed Sharing (2004). Learning Institutions and Economic Performance. Perspective on Politics, 2(1), 10-43.
    11. Melser, D. (2004).The Act of Thinking. The MIT Press, 78-130.
    12. Myers, D. (2000). Constructing the future in planning university of southern California. paper fotthcoming in the Journal of planning education and research, 1-45.
    13. Rebelo, S. (2005). Real business cycle models:past,present and future. The Scandinavian journal of economics, 107(2), 217-238
    14. Simon, H.(2011). Rational Decision Making in Business Organizations. Nobel Memorial Lecture of 8 December 1978. Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 65-90
    15. Sapru, R.(2006). Administration Theories and Management Thought. Delhi, Published by Prentice Hall of India, 2(3), 30-68.

     

    References In Persian:

    1. A) Books
    2. Ejlali, P., Asgari, A., Rafieian, M., & Naroui (2015). The Experience of Planning in the World. Origin and Evolution, Tehran (In Persian).
    3. Mr. Toogh, Muslim and Shams, Erfan and Faryadi, Massoud and Mashhadi, Ali (2010)
    4. Alvin Soo (2007). Social Change and Development. translated by Mahmoud Habibi Mazaheri, Tehran (In Persian).
    5. Barmaki, A. (2014). Pathology of Development Plans after the Islamic Revolution, Tehran: Deputy of Planning (In Persian).
    6. Tashkini, Ahmad; Hoseini, Seyed SHamsodin; Oryani, Bahare, & Faghih Nasiri, Marjan (2009). Development Planning: Principles. Concepts and Comparative Study of the Experience of Selected Countries and Iran (In Persian).
    7. Shakeri, A. (2015). About the Sixth Development Plan. Planning Problems in Iran, Tehran (In Persian).
    8. Ghasemi, M., Panahi, A., & Khezri, M. (2008). Budgeting in Iran, Budget and Stakeholders. Vol.1,Tehran: Research Center of the Islamic Consultative Assembly (In Persian).
    9. Groniogen, J., Spithaven, A., & Antoine van Berg (2012). An Introduction to Institutional Economics (In Persian).

    9.Modaresi, M. (2006). Descriptive Dictionary of Development Planning Vocabulary (In Persian).

    1. Research Center of the Islamic Consultative Assembly (2010). A Study of the Economic Planning System in Iran, Tehran (In Persian).
    2. Research Center of the Islamic Consultative Assembly (2012). A Comparative Study of Planning Systems in Iran. Tehran (In Persian).
    3. Parliamentary Research Center, Office of Program and Budget Studies (2012) (In Persian).

    13.Mazaheri, M.(2006). Education and Human Development (In Persian).

    1. North, Douglas C. (1998). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Tehran (In Persian).
    2. Noor Mohammadi, K. (2002). Challenges of using experts. researchers and theorists in the process of formulating (In Persian).

     

    1. B) Article

    16.Tehrani Skin Sales, I., & Ramz Yar, H. (2010). General Evaluation of Development Plans after the Revolution (In Persian).

    1. Hosseini Sadrabadi, I. (2017). Concept, features and characteristics of program law in Iranian and French legal systems, economic law in public policy (In Persian).
    2. Jafari, A., & Ghanbari, H. (2017). Study of Barriers to Economic Development of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Research of Nations, 21, 47-61 (In Persian).
    3. Khandozi, S. E. (2010). Evaluation of Development Programming Method in Iran (In Persian).
    4. Rostami, V., & Ebrahimi, M. (2018). The Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran and the Planning System. No. 19, 49-72 (In Persian).

    21.Tahan Nazif, H., Hadizadeh, A. (2018). The nature of development program laws in the Iranian legal system (In Persian).

    1. Gholami, A., & Bahadori Jahromi, A.(2013). Concept, nature and supervision of the implementation of general policies of the system. Quarterly Journal of Public Law Studies (In Persian).
    2. Kurdbacheh, M. (2008). A Review of the History of Planning in Iran (In Persian).
    3. Malmiri Center (2011). Reflections on the Boundaries of Policy and Legislation Case Study: The Provisions of the Fifth Development Plan Law in the Field of Culture (In Persian).
    4. Mirjalili, S. H. (2018). Book Development of Economic Development. Critical Research Journal of Humanities Texts and Programs, 18(1), 275-299 (In Persian).
Public Law Studies Quarterly
Volume 54, Issue 1
Spring 2024
Spring 2024
Pages 685-704

  • Receive Date 28 March 2021
  • Revise Date 08 August 2021
  • Accept Date 03 October 2021

Home

Journal Process Ethics

Peer Review Process

Submission

Indexing and Abstracting

Contact Us