نویسندگان
1 دانشیار، گروه حقوق عمومی، دانشکدۀ حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
2 دانش آموخته دکتری حقوق بین الملل، دانشکدۀ حقوق، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله English
نویسندگان English
Today, the forced migration of individuals has significantly affected European countries. In principle, individuals should not face persecution or violence in their homeland due to reasons such as race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political beliefs. In this context, the European Court of Human Rights has facilitated the protection of refugees by interpreting Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights. In this paper, through a descriptive-analytical method, we have examined and analyzed the legal dimensions of the principle of "non-refoulement" and the judicial practices of the European Court of Human Rights in supporting refugees by studying relevant international and European treaties. By comparing the laws of the European Union and the protective standards for refugees in the European Convention on Human Rights, differences can be observed that have been addressed in this research. It is believed that this contradiction has led to the dual approach of member states of the Union in this regard and has resulted in differing rulings in similar refugee cases.
کلیدواژهها English
الف) کتابها
ب) مقالات
ج) کنوانسیونها و معاهدات بینالمللی