1. فارسی

الف) کتاب‌ها

1. زمانی، سیدقاسم (۱۳۹۳). حقوق سازمان‌های بین‌المللی. چ دوم، تهران: شهر دانش.
2. سیفی، سیدجمال (۱۴۰۱). حقوق مسئولیت بین‌المللی: گفتارهایی در مسئولیت بین‌المللی دولت. تهران: شهر دانش.
3. کاتوزیان، ناصر (۱۳۹۰). وقایع حقوقی، مسئولیت مدنی. چ ششم، تهران: شرکت سهامی انتشار.

ب) مقالات

4. سیفی، سیدجمال؛ زرگری‌نژاد، نسیم (۱۴۰۱). ملاحظاتی انتقادی بر یکسان‌انگاری ارکان تحقق مسئولیت بین‌المللی دولت‌ها و سازمان‌های بین‌المللی. فصلنامة مطالعات حقوق عمومی، ۲۵(۹۸)، ۶۹-۹۴.
5. ستایش‌پور، محمد؛ حدادی، مهدی (۱۳۹۶). کنکاش در لزوم وجود نهاد «مسئولیت اشتقاقی» در آورده‌های کمیسیون حقوق بین‌الملل. فصلنامۀ مطالعات حقوق عمومی، ۴۷(۳)، ۷۷۱-۷۹۵.
6. مومنی‌راد، احمد؛ ستایش‌پور، محمد (۱۳۹۸). دامنة مفهومی مسئولیت اشتقاقی سازمان‌های بین‌المللی در حقوق بین‌الملل. فصلنامة مطالعات حقوق عمومی، ۹۴(۳)، ۶۳۵-۶۵۵.
7. قدیرلی، نرگس؛ حسینی اکبرنژاد، حوریه (۱۴۰۰). دکترین «حمایت برابر» تنزل در اصل «تفکیک» در نظام مسئولیت بین‌المللی سازمان‌ها. پژوهش حقوق عمومی، ۲۲(۷،) ۳۴۶-۳۷۳.

2. انگلیسی
3. A) Books
4. Crawford, J. (2013). State Responsibility: The General Part. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Lanovoy, V. (2016). Complicity and Its Limits in the Law of International Responsibility. Studies in International Law, Oxford: Hart Publishing.
6. Voulgaris, N. (2019). Allocating International Responsibility between Member States and International Organisations. Oxford: Hart Publishing.

1. B) Articles
2. d’Aspremont, J. (2012). The Articles on the Responsibility of International Organizations: Magnifying the Fissures in the Law of International Responsibility, International Organizations Law Review, 9(1), 25-113.
3. d’Aspremont, J. (2017). International Responsibility and the Constitution of Power: International Organizations Bolstered. In International Organizations and Member State Responsibility, edited by Ana Sofia Barros, Cedric Ryngaert, and Jan Wouters: Leiden, Brill/Nijhoff, 95-113.
4. Dominicé, C. (2010). Attribution of Conduct to Multiple States and the Implication of a State in the Act of another State. In The Law of International Responsibility, edited by James Crawford, Alain Pellet, Simon Olleson, and Kate Parlett: Oxford, Oxford University Press, 281-291.
5. Fry J. (2014). Attribution of Responsibility. In Principles of Shared Responsibility in International Law: An Appraisal of the State of the Art, edited by André Nollkaemper and Ilias Plakokefalos, Cambridge University Press, 98 – 133.
6. Klein, P. (2010). The Attribution of Acts to International Organizations. In The Law of International Responsibility, edited by James Crawford, Alain Pellet, Simon Olleson, and Kate Parlett: Oxford, Oxford University Press, 297-317.
7. Kuijper, P. J. (2010). Amsterdam Center for International Law Introduction to the Symposium on Responsibility of International Organizations and of (Member) States: Attributed or Direct Responsibility or Both. International Organizations Law Review, 7 (1), 9–33.
8. Nolte, G. 2002. From Dioniso Anzilotti to Roberto Ago: The Classical International Law of State Responsibility and the Traditional Primacy of a Bilateral Conception of Inter-State Relations, European Journal of International Law, 13(5), 1083-1098.
9. Palchetti, P. (2017). Litigating Member State Responsibility: The Monetary Gold Principle and the Protection of Absent Organizations. In The Law of International Responsibility, edited by James Crawford, Alain Pellet, Simon Olleson, and Kate Parlett: Oxford, Oxford University Press, 178–192.
10. Pomson O. (2019). Does the Monetary Gold Principle Apply to International Courts and Tribunals Generally? Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 10(1), 88–125.
11. Simma, (1994). From Bilateralism to Community Interest in International Law Recueil des Cours de l'Académie de Droit International, 250, 295-430.
12. Voulgaris, N. (2014). Rethinking Indirect Responsibility, International Organizations Law Review, 11(1), 5-52.

1. C) Documents
2. ILC (2011). Draft Articles on Responsibility of International Organizations with commentaries, A/66/10.
3. ILC, ILC Draft Articles on International Responsibility of States with commentaries. A/56/10.

1. D) Case law
2. Certain Phosphate Lands in Nauru (Nauru v. Australia), Preliminary Objections, Judgment, ICJ. Reports 1992
3. Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Croatia v. Serbia), Judgment, ICJ. Reports 2015.
4. Application of the Interim Accord of 13 September 1995 (the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia v. Greece), Judgment of 5 December 2011, ICJ. Reports 2011
5. Bosphorus Hava Yolları Turizm ve Ticaret Anonim Şirketi v. Ireland, Application no. 45036/98,30, ECTHR, June 2005
6. Gasparini v Italy and Belgium, No. 10750/03, Admissibility Decision, ECTHR, 12 May 2009
7. Waite and Kennedy v Germany, App No 26083/94, ECTHR, 18 February 1999

1. E) Website
2. European Commission (2022). Statement by Executive Vice-President Dombrovskis on EU Decision to Stop Treating Russia as a Most-Favoured-Nation at the WTO, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/commissioners/2019-2024/dombrovskis/announcements/statement-executive-vice-president-dombrovskis-eu-decision-0_en.