1. فارسی

- مقالات

1. اسلامی، رضا؛ گل‏ریحان، نسرین (1389). حمایت از آزادی هنر در نظام بین‏المللی حقوق بشر. نشریة حقوق اساسی، 7(14)، 1-27.
2. امینی، عبدالله (1401). تأملی بر رابطة هنر با زندگی در تفکر دیویی (با تکیه بر مفهوم تجربه). پژوهش‏های فلسفی، دانشگاه تبریز، 16(38)، 616-643. DOI: 10.22034/jpiut.2022.49573.3092
3. سادات‏اخوی، سیدعلی (1385). قاعدة قانون مطلوب‏تر به‏عنوان ضابطة حل تعارض میان معاهدات حقوق بشری. مجلة دانشکدة حقوق و علوم سیاسی، (72)، 201-219.
4. شهبازی، آرامش (1395). لزوم رعایت حریم خصوصی- درمانی قربانیان کاربرد سلاح‏های شیمیایی جنگ عراق علیه ایران. فصلنامة مطالعات حقوق عمومی، 46(2)، 417-440. DOI: 10.22059/jplsq.2016.58204
5. شهبازی، آرامش (1389). هتک حرمت ساحت مقدس قرآن کریم در ترازوی حقوق بین الملل. مجلة حقوقی بین‏المللی، 27(43)، 39-61.
6. ملکی‏زاده، امیرحسین؛ موسوی‏فر، سید حسین (1401). نگرشی بر دکترین حاشیة صلاحدید در تفسیر. مطالعات حقوق عمومی، 52(42)، 2057-2074. DOI:10.22059/jplsq.2020.261378.1783

2. انگلیسی و فرانسوی
3. A) Books
4. Arnheim, (1992). To the Rescue of Art: Twenty-Six Essays, To the Rescue of Art: Twenty-Six Essays. Berkeley, California University of California Press.
5. Kearns, P. (2013). Freedom of Artistic Expression: Essays on Culture and Legal Censure. Oxford, Hart Publishing.
6. Krenn Martin(2019). Dialogical Interventions – Art in the Social Realm, Berlin, Walter de Gruyter.
7. McCarthy, A. L. S. (1998). The International Law of Human Rights and States of Exception: With Special Reference to the Travaux Preparatories and Case-Law of the International Monitoring Organs. London, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
8. Nicole, F. M., & Silhol, O. (2014). Droit de l’art. Paris, ELLIPSES; 2ème edition.
9. Polymenopoulou, E. (2023). Introduction. In Artistic Freedom in International Law. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
10. Regli, C. (2018). The subversive art form: When performance art challenges the conventions of established art by embracing experience in real time/space as artistic value, Zurich, University of the Arts.
11. Tricoire, A. (2011). Petit traité de la liberté artistique. Paris, La Découverte.
12. Whyatt, S. (2023). Free to Create: Artistic Freedom in Europe: Council of Europe Report on the Freedom of Artistic Expression, Strasbourg, Council of Europe Publishing.

1. B) Articles
2. Bieczyński, M. M. (2021). The History of Artistic Freedom as a Legal Standard in Western Culture: An Attempt at Periodization of the Process of Its Formation. Santander Art and Culture Law Review, (7), 145-170. DOI:10.4467/2450050XSNR.21.010.14599.
3. Cseporán, Z. (2017). International and Foreign Trends Regulating the Freedom of Artistic Expression. Pécs Journal of International and European Law, (2), 71-83.
4. Cuny, L. (2023). Progressive autonomy of artistic freedom in international law: The contribution of the UN in promoting new economic, social, and cultural rights-based approaches. Chapters, in: Fiana Gantheret & Nolwenn Guibert & Sofia Stolk (ed.), Art and Human Rights, chapter 4, pp. 76-97, Edward Elgar Publishing.
5. Danchin, P.G. (2008). Of Prophets and Proselytes: Freedom of Religion and the Conflict of Rights in International Law. Harvard International Law Journal, 49(2).
6. Djajić, S., & Dubravka, L. (2021). Artistic expression: freedom or curse? Some thoughts on jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights from the theoretical perspective of visual and performance arts and rationales behind freedom of political expression. The Age of Human Rights Journal, (17), 97-124. DOI: 10.17561/tahrj.v17.6269
7. Eberle, E. J. (2007–2008). Art as Speech. University of Pennsylvania Journal of Law and Social Change, (11), 1-28.
8. Flauss, Jean-François (2009). "The European Court of Human Rights and the Freedom of Expression," Indiana Law Journal, (84), 809-849.
9. Fourlon Armelle, Boris Khalvadjian (2009). Art, liberté, responsabilité. Exposé juridique d’une affaire de concessions. Marges, (9), 68-83.
10. Gaut, B. (2005). The Cluster Account of Art Defended”, The British Journal of Aesthetics, 45(3), 273–288, DOI:10.1093/aesthj
11. Geiger, C. (2018). Freedom of Artistic Creativity and Copyright Law: A Compatible Combination?. UC Irvine Law Review, (8), 413-458.
12. Geiger, C. (2021). Fair Use through Fundamental Rights: When Freedom of Artistic Expression allows Creative Appropriations and Opens up Statutory Copyright Limitations . in: S. Balganesh, W.L. Ng-Loy and H. Sun (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Copyright Limitations and Exceptions, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 174-194 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3725013.
13. Gerards, J. (2013). How to improve the necessity test of the European Court of Human Rights. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 11(2), 466–490. DOI:1093/icon/mot004
14. Henkin, L. (1995). Group Defamation and International Law. in: Monroe H Freedman & Eric M Freedman(eds). Group Defamation and Freedom of Speech: The Relationship Between Language and Violence,Westport, Praeger.
15. Khatchadourian Haig(1965).“The Expression Theory of Art: A Critical Evaluation”, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 335-352.
16. O'Neil, R. M. (1990) Artistic Freedom and Academic Freedom. Law and Contemporary Problems, (53), 177-193.
17. Pluwak, A. (2020). Beyond Outrage: Approaching Arts Controversy in Post communist Poland. East European Politics and Societies, 35(3), 682-702. DOI: 10.1177/0888325420928417.
18. Polymenopoulou, E. (2016). Does One Swallow Make a Spring? Artistic and Literary Freedom at the European Court of Human Rights. Human Rights Law Review, 16(3), 511–539. DOI: 10.1093/hrlr/ngw011.

1. C) Documents &Websites
2. A/C.3/69/SR.31, available at: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/788267?ln=en#record-files-collapse-header(Last Visited: Oct.2023
3. A/C.3/70/SR.28, available at: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/812171?ln=en#record-files-collapse-header(Last Visited: Oct.2023).
4. Artistic Freedom, available at: https://en.unesco.org/creativity/sites/creativity/files/artistic_freedom_pdf_web.pdf, Last Visited: Oct.2023).
5. Guide on Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, Freedom of expression, Updated on 31 August 2022, available at: https://echr.coe.int/Documents/Guide_Art_10_ENG.pdf.(Last Visited: Oct.2023).
6. Human Rights Council, A/HRC/23/24/2013, Para. 25-32, Rabat Plan of Action.
7. Khan Irene, UN Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the rights to freedom of opinion and expression, in the state of artistic freedom 2022, Freemuse, defining artistic freedom, 2022.
8. Rabat Plan of Action, A/HRC/22/17/Add.4 https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Issues/Opinion/SeminarRabat/Rabat_draft_outcome.pdf (Last Visited: Oct.2023).
9. Shaheed, Farida(2013) Report of the Special Rapporteur in the field of cultural rights, the right to freedom of artistic expression and creativity, A/HRC/23/34.
10. The European Court Of Human Rights From The Theoretical Perspective Of Visual And Performance Arts And Rationales Behind Freedom Of Political Expression. The Age of Human Rights Journal, 17, 2021, ISSN: 2340-9592 DOI: 10.17561/tahrj.v17.6269 97.
11. The Rabat Plan of Action: A global blueprint for combating “hate speech, European Human Rights Law Review 2, 2014.

1. D) Cases
2. Handyside v UK, 7 December 1976, Series A No 24.
3. Handyside v United Kingdom Application No 5493/72, Merits, 7 December 1976.
4. Karataş V. Turkey Judgment, Available at https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/62840b/pdf/(Last Visited: Oct.2023).
5. Müller and Others v Switzerland, Judgement, ECtHR, 24 May 1988, No 10737/84.
6. Otto-Preminger-Institut V. Austria, Application no. 13470/87, Judgment Strasbourg, September 1994, Available at https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-57897%22]}.(Last Visited: Oct.2023).
7. Stern Taulats and Roura Capellera v. Spain, No. 51168/15, 13 March 2018.
8. Tatár and Fáber v. Hungary, nos. 26005/08 and 26160/08, 12 June 2012.
9. Vereiningung Bildender Kunstler v. Austria, No. 68354/01, 25 January 2007