1. فارسی

الف) کتاب‌ها

1. رشیدیان، عبدالکریم (1403). دریدا در متن. چ دوم، تهران: نی..
2. دولی، مارک (1400). فلسفۀ دریدا. ترجمۀ نادر خسروی. چ دوم، تهران: نی.

ب) مقالات

3. حسینی، سیده لطیفه (1398). بررسی انتقادی آرای اخیر دادگاه اروپایی دادگستری و دادگاه اروپایی حقوق بشر در خصوص آزادی مذهب در چارچوب دکترین حاشیۀ صلاحدید. فصلنامه مطالعات حقوق بشر، (17)، 45-53.
4. قاری سیدفاطمی، سیدمحمد؛ طاهرخانی، مصطفی (1401). ژاک دریدا و واسازی قانون. مجلۀ تحقیقات حقوقی، (100)، 59-85.
5. پارسانیا، حمید؛ حافظیان، نرگس (1396). استراتژی واسازی و امکان تحقق عدالت. مجلۀ اسلام و مطالعات اجتماعی، (17)، 82-105.
6. راغب، نیلوفر (1394). میان‌کنش دکترین صلاحدید و عرف بین‌المللی. پژوهشنامۀ حقوق بین‌الملل، (29)، 157-165.
7. سواری، حسن (1395). اعمال حاشیۀ صلاحدید در پرتو مکاتب حقوقی و رویۀ دیوان اروپایی حقوق بشر. مجلۀ حقوق تطبیقی، (50)، 120-140.
8. حسین پناهی، فردین؛ شیخ احمدی، سیداسعد (1396). زبان، استعاره، حقیقت (بررسی نقش استعاره در تکوین پساساختارگرایی: با تکیه بر آرای دریدا). مجلۀ فنون ادبی، (19)، 103-118.
9. عبدی، ایوب؛ زمانی، سیدقاسم (1397). پروتکل شمارۀ 15 و اصلاح نظام اروپایی حقوق بشر. فصلنامۀ پژوهش‌های حقوق تطبیقی، (43)، 42-56.
10. فلاح، سارا (1401). بررسی دکترین حاشیۀ صلاحدید از منظر فلسفۀ حقوق. مجلۀ پژوهش‌های حقوقی.

2. انگلیسی
3. A) Books
4. Agamben, G. (2005). State of Exception. University of Chicago Press, 1st edition.
5. Arai-Takahashi, Y. (2002). The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine and the Principle of Proportionality in the Jurisprudence of the ECHR. Intersentia.
6. Bates, Ed. (2010). The Evolution of the European Convention on Human Rights: From Its Inception to the Creation of a Permanent Court of Human Rights. Oxford University Press.
7. Baxi, U. (2008). The Future of Human Rights. Oxford University Press.
8. Cahill, M. (2011). Human Rights in Europe: A Comparative Approach. Oxford University Press.
9. Culler, J. (1982). On Deconstruction: Theory and Criticism after Structuralism. Cornell University Press.
10. Derrida, J. (1976). Of Grammatology. Johns Hopkins University Press.
11. Derrida, J. (1978). Writing and Difference. University of Chicago Press.
12. Derrida, Jacques. (1981). Dissemination. University of Chicago Press.
13. Derrida, Jacques. (1981). Positions. Translated by Alan Bass. University of Chicago Press.
14. Derrida, J. (1992). Given Time: I. Counterfeit Money. Translated by Peggy Kamuf. University of Chicago Press.
15. Derrida, J. (1992). The Other Heading: Reflections on Today’s Europe. Indiana University Press}$) \times 2$.
16. Derrida, J. (1994). Spectres of Marx: The State of the Debt, the Work of Mourning, and the New International. Routledge.
17. Derrida, J. (1997). A Taste for the Secret. Polity Press.
18. Derrida, J. (1997). Limited Inc. Northwestern University Press.
19. Derrida, J. (2002). Margins of Philosophy. University of Chicago Press.
20. Derrida, J. (2002). The Gift of Death. University of Chicago Press.
21. Derrida, J. (2003). Rogues: Two Essays on Reason. Stanford University Press.
22. Douzinas, C. (2000). The End of Human Rights: Critical Legal Thought at the Turn of the Century. Hart Publishing.
23. Dyzenhaus, D. (2006). The Constitution of Law: Legality in a Time of Emergency. Cambridge University Press.
24. Greer, S. (2000). The Margin of Appreciation: Interpretation and Discretion under the European Convention on Human Rights. Council of Europe Publishing.
25. Habermas, J. (2003). The Future of Human Nature. Polity Press.
26. Hutchinson, A. (2006). Human Rights and the Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in the European Court of Human Rights. Oxford University Press.
27. Ignatieff, M. (2001). Human Rights as Politics and Idolatry. Princeton University Press.
28. Kadi, F. (2009). The Doctrine of Margin of Appreciation: A Comparative Study. Routledge.
29. Kennedy, D. (1997). A Critique of Adjudication (fin de siècle). Harvard University Press.
30. Koskenniemi, M. (2005). From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument. Cambridge University Press.
31. Letsas, G. (2007). A Theory of Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights. Oxford University Press.
32. McGoldrick, D. (1994). The Human Rights Committee: Its Role in the Development of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Oxford University Press.
33. McVeigh, S. (2011). Jurisprudence of Jurisdiction. 1st Edition, Routledge.
34. Menke, C. (1994). The Philosophy of Law and the Concept of Justice in Contemporary Legal Theory. Springer.
35. Mouffe, C. (2000). The Democratic Paradox. Verso.
36. Mowbray, A. (2005). The European Convention on Human Rights: Text and Commentary. Oxford University Press.
37. Schwabe, C. (2012). Law and Discrimination in the European Court. Hart Publishing.
38. Weber, M. (2014). Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. University of California Press.
39. Zerjal, M. (2022). The Margin of Appreciation in European Human Rights Law: Theoretical and Practical Perspectives. Oxford University Press.

1. B) Articles
2. Alston, P. (2007). Making Human Rights Count: The Role of the United Nations and Other Actors in the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights. In Making Human Rights Real: A Symposium on Human Rights Law.
3. Anker, D. (2019). Cultural Traditions and Human Rights: The Conflict Between National Interests and Individual Rights. Yale Law Review, 128(2), 112–139.
4. Benvenisti, E. (1999). Margin of Appreciation and the Democratic Sovereignty of States. European Journal of International Law, 10(2), 509–543.
5. Benvenisti, E. (1999). Margin of Appreciation, Consensus, and Universal Standards. NYU Journal of International Law and Politics, 31(4), pp. 843–854.
6. Brems, E. (1996). The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in the Case-Law of the European Court of Human Rights. Heidelberg Journal of International Law, 56(2), 240–283.
7. Derrida, J. (1990). Force of Law: The ‘Mystical Foundation of Authority’. Cardozo Law Review, 11(5), 947–1045.
8. Derrida, J. (1990). The Politics of Naming. In Dissemination (949–951). University of Chicago Press.
9. Derrida, J. (1992). Force of Law: The ‘Mystical Foundation of Authority’. In Deconstruction and the Possibility of Justice, eds. Drucilla Cornell, Michel Rosenfeld, and David Carlson, Routledge, 3–67.
10. Helfer, L. R. (1993). Consensus, Coherence, and the European Convention on Human Rights. Cornell International Law Journal, 26(1), 133–165.
11. Helfer, L. R. (1999). The Margin of Appreciation and the Role of the State in Human Rights Law. International Journal of Human Rights, 3(1), 45–65.
12. Letsas, G. (2006). Two Concepts of the Margin of Appreciation. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 26(4), 705–732.
13. Letsas, G. (2012). The ECHR as a Living Instrument: Its Meaning and Legitimacy. In A. Føllesdal, B. Peters & G. Ulfstein (Eds.), Constituting Europe: The European Court of Human Rights in a National, European and Global Context. Cambridge University Press.
14. Letsas, G. (2013). The Doctrine of Margin of Appreciation and the European Court of Human Rights. Human Rights Law Review, 13(3), 495–529.
15. Letsas, G. (2013). The ECHR as a Living Instrument: Its Meaning and Legitimacy. Law and Philosophy, 32(6), 753–785.
16. Mahoney, P. (1998). From Strasbourg with Love: The Future of Human Rights in Europe. Human Rights Quarterly, 20(1), 63–81.
17. Mahoney, P. (1998). The Margin of Appreciation: A Review of the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights. Human Rights Law Journal, 19(1), 38-63.
18. Scheppele, K. L. (2004). Law in a Time of Emergency: States of Exception and the Temptations of 9/11. University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, 6(5), 1001–1083.
19. Shany, Y. (2005). Toward a General Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in International Law? European Journal of International Law, 16(6), 907–940.
20. Theilen, R. (2021). The Inflation of Human Rights: A Deconstruction. Leiden Journal of International Law, (34), 831–854.
21. Weber, E. (2005). Deconstruction is Justice. German Law Journal, 6(1), 180–184.

1. C) Cases
2. Al-Saadoon and Mufdhi v. United Kingdom (2010). No. 61498/08, ECtHR.
3. Animal Defenders International v. United Kingdom (2013). App.No. 48876/08. ECtHR.
4. Cengiz and Others v. Turkey (2015). App.No. 48226/10. ECtHR.
5. H. and Others v. Czech Republic (2007). App.No. 57325/00. ECtHR.
6. B. v. France (2008). App.No. 43546/02. ECtHR.
7. Gas and Dubois v. France (2012). App.No. 25951/07. ECtHR.
8. Handyside v. The United Kingdom (1976). App.No. 5493/72. ECtHR.
9. Hatton and Others v. the United Kingdom (2003). No. 36022/97. ECtHR.
10. Kokkinakis v. Greece (1993). App.No. 14307/88. ECtHR.
11. Leyla Şahin v. Turkey (2005). App.No. 44774/98. ECtHR.
12. Lautsi v. Italy (2011). App.No. 30814/06. ECtHR.
13. Open Door and Dublin Well Woman v. Ireland (1992). No. 14234/88. ECtHR.
14. Vinter and Others v. United Kingdom (2013). App.No. 66069/09. ECtHR.