نوع مقاله : علمی-پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشیار گروه حقوق عمومی، دانشکدۀ حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه مازندران، بابلسر، ایران
2 دانشیار گروه حقوق عمومی، دانشکدۀ حقوق دانشگاه قم، قم، ایران
3 دانشیار گروه حقوق بشر و حقوق محیط زیست، دانشکدۀ حقوق، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران
4 دانشجوی دورۀ دکترای حقوق عمومی،دانشکدۀ حقوق، دانشگاه قم، قم، ایران
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله English
نویسندگان English
Today, respect for cultural diversity is considered essential for the implementation of the universality of human rights. However, there is a conceptual divergence between cultural diversity and universality in the field of human rights, with respect for cultural diversity appearing closer to relativism at first glance. Nevertheless, a contextual interpretation of human rights is an approach that can effectively bridge the concepts of universality and cultural diversity. This interpretation implies that in recognizing, applying, and safeguarding universal human rights, the cultural, social, and economic contexts of societies must be taken into account. Utilizing this interpretation of human rights requires certain prerequisites, and the existence of a public dialogue is one of these prerequisites. Additionally, public dialogue fosters greater convergence in value domains and can lead to the creation of shared beliefs and values. This research seeks to examine the extent to which and how public dialogue can be effective in providing a contextual interpretation of human rights. Such dialogues occur at the national level among individuals, groups, ethnicities, and subcultures to achieve consensus and a shared understanding of fundamental human rights values.
کلیدواژهها English
- مقالات