نوع مقاله : علمی-پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دورۀ دکتری حقوق بینالملل دانشکدۀ حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران
2 استاد دانشکدۀ حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله English
نویسندگان English
In recent years, G20 has emerged as a relatively new, yet influential actor on the world stage which brings together the leaders of the twenty systemically most important economies. Its informality and flexible character warrant the use of the term ‘Informal International Lawmaking. ‘Informal International Lawmaking’ (or “IN-LAW”) comprises networks of global cooperation that are distinct from ‘traditional’ international law as they display fewer formal characteristics; the actors are not necessarily diplomats or heads of state, the process is not necessarily structured by formal proceedings and the output is not (always) an internationally binding legal instrument. Implementation is underway. But how binding are the commitments? Are they any more than soft law? Are the commitments enforceable in their own right? Can they be enforced through other existing obligations or structures? This Article sets out a framework for analyzing G20 commitments under international law, namely, as unilateral declarations, customary international law, or interfacing with general principles of law including reciprocity and estoppel.
کلیدواژهها English
الف) کتابها
ب) مقالات