دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران
نوع مقاله : علمی-پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دبیر اندیشکدۀ حقوق بانکی و دانشجوی مقطع دکتری حقوق عمومی دانشگاه امام صادق(ع)؛ تهران، ایران
2 دانشیار گروه حقوق عمومی و بینالملل دانشکدۀ معارف اسلامی و حقوق، دانشگاه امام صادق(ع)؛ تهران، ایران
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله English
نویسندگان English
Despite the institutional design of banks as vehicles for monetary operations within national and international economic frameworks, factors such as negative real interest rates have driven them toward alternative profit-generating practices. These practices, commonly termed in legal-economic contexts as "business ownership," "commercial investments," or "banking-related legal partnerships," have proliferated. While this systemic issue has become markedly prevalent in Iran, the legislature, in a delayed response, initially enacted Articles 16 and 17 of the Act on Removing Obstacles to Competitive Production. However, nearly a decade after their adoption, these provisions have not only failed to resolve the problem of banks’ commercial engagements but have also led to stricter regulatory measures under Article 8 of the Seventh Development Plan Law. The research hypothesizes is that Articles 16 and 17 of the aforementioned law have inadequately regulated banks’ commercial activities due to critical legislative flaws, including deficient legislative understanding of the issue’s complexity, ineffective legal drafting (e.g., ambiguous terminology, lack of coherence, perpetually exploitable exceptions, absence of illustrative case examples), unverifiable provisions, and lax regulatory standards that conflict with legislative objectives, compounded by institutional conflicts of interest. To validate this hypothesis, the authors employ a descriptive-analytical methodology to define the scope and multidimensional nature of banks’ commercial activities and retrospectively assess the law’s impact during the post-implementation phase. The analysis reveals that Articles 16 and 17 adopt an excessively prohibitive approach toward banks’ commercial engagements, failing to establish a framework for effective regulation. This conclusively corroborates the hypothesis that structural deficiencies in legislative design and implementation have rendered these provisions ineffective.
کلیدواژهها English
الف) کتابها
ب) مقالات
ج) گزارشهای پژوهشی
د) روزنامهها
