نوع مقاله : علمی-پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشیار دانشکدۀ علوم اداری و اقتصاد، دانشگاه اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران
2 پژوهشگر پسادکترای حقوق کیفری و جرمشناسی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران
3 دانشجوی دکتری حقوق کیفری و جرمشناسی، دانشگاه میبد، تهران، ایران
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله English
نویسندگان English
This paper examines rules governing restrictions on internet access referred to as “internet filtering” in light of the right to freedom of communication and with a view to the approach of the Council of Europe as well as Japan and Belgium. It presents an optimal solution for Iranian legislators to deal with filtering cases. Results of this paper indicate internet filtering is basically a phenomenon contrary to the requirements of the right to freedom of communication, and therefore, taking action against this freedom should be considered an exceptional topic and based on sufficient rational evidence and wise action by governments that respect freedom of communication of citizens. In addition, the most notable exceptional cases in which internet filtering is permissible include: occurrence of terrorist attacks or security risks, access by minors to immoral data and systems, and access to systems and data that lead to crime. Also, since lawful internet filtering is considered to be the exception, rules governing lawful filtering include: predictability, ability to appeal, monitoring, limited period, necessity, and legality. Accordingly, the Iranian legislator should aim to enact an internet filtering law which enumerates the cases where internet filtering would be permissible and its governing rules.
کلیدواژهها English
الف) کتابها
ب) مقالات
ج) پایاننامهها
صفری، ملیکا(1399)، رویه دیوان اروپایی حقوق بشر پیرامون حق دسترسی آزاد به اینترنت. پایاننامه کارشناسی ارشد حقوق بشر. به راهنمایی رضا اسلامی. تهران: دانشکده حقوق، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی.