1. فارسی
الف) کتاب‌ها
1. تقی‌زاده انصاری، مصطفی (1394)، ترمینولوژی حقوق بین‌المللی، چ اول، تهران: خرسندی.
2. خلیل‌زاده، مونا (1393)، مسئولیت بین‌المللی دولتها در قبال حملات سایبری: تهران: مجمع علمی و فرهنگی مجد.
3. کازرونی، سید مصطفی (1393)، مسئولیت حمایت در حقوق بین‌الملل، چ اول، تهران: نگاه بینه.
ب) مقالات
4. اصلانی، جبار؛ رنجبریان، امیرحسین (1394)، «بررسی تطبیقی و تحلیل تعریف حملۀ سایبری از منظر دکترین، رویۀ کشورها و سازمان‌های بین‌المللی در حقوق بین‌الملل»، فصلنامۀ تحقیقات حقوقی دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، ش 71، ص 278-257.
5. جاوید، محمدجواد؛ محمدی، عقیل (1392)، «نسبت اصل عدم مداخله در حقوق بین‌الملل معاصر و اصل حاکمیت از مستضعفین در حقوق اسلامی»، مجلۀ مطالعات حقوقی دانشگاه شیراز، دورۀ پنجم، ش 1، ص 88-49.
6. خلف رضایی، حسین (1392)، «حملات سایبری از منظر حقوق بین‌الملل (مطالعۀ موردی استاکس نت)»، فصلنامۀ مجلس و راهبرد، سال بیستم، ش 73، ص 153-125.
7. صادقی حقیقی، دیدخت (1390)، «تحول در مفهوم اصل عدم مداخله»، فصلنامۀ مطالعات روابط بین‌الملل، دورۀ 4، ش 16، ص 128-93.
8. کمالی‌نژاد، حسن (1391)، «بند 7 مادۀ 2 منشور ملل متحد: رویکردهای نوین مجمع عمومی ملل متحد»، مجموعه مقالات همایش نقش مجمع عمومی سازمان ملل متحد در تدوین و توسعۀ تدریجی حقوق بین‌الملل، انجمن ایرانی مطالعات سازمان ملل متحد، ص 282-244.
2. انگلیسی
A) Books
9. Oxford, Anne (2003), Reading Humanitarian Intervention, Human Rights and the Use of Force in International Law, Cambridge University Press.
10. Simma, Bruno and Daniel Erasmus Khan and George Nolte and Andreas Paulus, (2012), The Charter of the United Nations, A Commentary, Third Edition, Vol. 1, Oxford University Press.
B) Articles
11. Buchan, Russell, (2012), “Cyber Attacks: Unlawful Uses of Force or Prohibited Interventions”, Journal of Conflict & Security Law, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 211-227.
13. Gervais, Michael, (2012), “Cyber Attacks and the Laws of War”, Berkeley Journal of International Law, Vol. 30, Issue 2, pp. 525-579.
14. Hathaway, Oona A., & Rebecca Crootof, (2012), “The Law of Cyber-Attack”, California Law Review, Vol. 100, pp. 817-886.
15. Heaton, Major J. Ricou, (2005), “Civilians at War: Reexamining the Status of Civilians Accompanying the Armed Forces”, The Air Force Law Review, Vol. 57, pp. 155-209.
16. Jamnejad, Maziar & Michael Wood, (2009), “The Principle of Non-intervention”, Leiden Journal of International Law, Vol. 22, Issue 2, pp. 345-381.
17. Kesan, Jay P. & Carol M. Hayes, (2012), “Mitigative Counterstriking: Self-Defense and Deterrence in Cyberspace”, Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, Vol. 25, NO. 2, pp. 429-543.
18. Kilovaty, Ido (2014), “Cyber Warfare and the Jus Ad Bellum Challenges: Evaluation in the Light of the Tallinn Manual on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Warfare”, American University National Security Law Brief, Vol. 5, Issue 1, pp. 91-124.
19. Kirsch, Cassandra M., (2012), “Science Fiction No More: Cyber Warfare and the United States”, Denver Journal of International Law and Policy, Vol. 40:4, pp. 620-647.
20. Kozlowski, Andrzej (2014), “Comparative Analysis of Cyberattacks on Estonia, Georgia and Kyrgyzstan”, European Scientific Journal /SPECIAL/ edition, Vol.3, pp. 237-245.
21. Lotrionte, Catherine (2015), “Countering State-Sponsored Cyber Economic Espionage under International Law”, North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation, Vol. XL, pp. 443-541.
22. Mattessich, William (2016), “Digital Destruction: Applying the Principle of Non-Intervention to Distributed Denial of Service Attacks Manifesting No Physical Damage”, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, Vol. 54, pp. 873-896.
23. Schmitt, Michael N., (2014), “Below the threshold” Cyber Operations: The Countermeasures Responses Option and International Law”, Virginia Journal of International Law, Vol. 54:3, pp. 697-732.
24. Stockburger, Peter Z., (2016), “Known Unknowns: State Cyber Operations, Cyber Warfare, and the Jus Ad Bellum”, American University International Law Review, Vol. 31, Issue 4, pp. 545-591.
25. Watts, Sean, (2014), “Low-intensity Cyber Operations and the Principle of Non-intervention”, Baltic Yearbook of International Law Online, Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2479609, Visited on 10 August 2016, pp. 137-161
C) Documents
26. Charter of Economic Rights and Duties of States, A/RES/29/3281, 12 December 1974
27. Declaration on Principles of International Law Concerning Friendly Relations among States in accordance with Charter of the United Nations, A/RES/25/2625, 24 October 1970
28. Declaration on the Inadmissibility of Intervention and Interference in the Internal Affairs of States, A/RES/36/103, 9 December 1981
29. Dogrul, Murat and Adil Aslan, Eyyup Celik, (2011),
Developing an International Cooperation on Cyber Defense and Deterrence Against Cyber Terrorism, 2011, 3rd International Conference on Cyber Conflict C. Czosseck, E. Tyugu, T. Wingfield (Eds.) Tallinn, Estonia, 2011 © CCD COE Publications, p. 34, Available at:
https://ccdcoe.org/ICCC/materials/proceedings/dogrul_aslan_celik.pdf
30. Heinegg, Wolff Heintschel von, (2012), Legal Implications of Territorial Sovereignty in Cyberspace, 2012 4th International Conference on Cyber Conflict, NATO Publications, Tallinn, pp. 7-19
31. Joubert, Vincent, (2012),
Five Years after Estonia’s Cyber Attacks: Lessons Learned for NATO?, Research Paper, Research Division, NATO Defense College, Rome, No. 76, , Available at:
https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/143191/rp_76.pdf, Visited on 10 August 2016
32. Lipson, Howard F, (2002), Tracking and Tracing Cyber-Attacks: Technical Challenges and Global Policy Issues, Carnegie Mellon Software Engineering Institute, Special Report CMU/sei-2002-sr-009
35. Tallinn Manual on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Warfare, (2013), Prepared by International Group of Experts at the Invitation of NATO Cooperative Cyber Defence Centre of Excellence (edited by M. N. Schmitt), Cambridge University Press
36. Targeted cyber-attacks, The dangers faced by your corporate network, GFI White Paper, Microsoft Gold Certificate Paper, p. 8, Available at: http://www.gfi.com/whitepapers/cyber-attacks.pdf, Visited on September 2016
38. Vienna Convention on the law of treaties (1969)
39. Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties between States and International Organizations or between International Organizations (1986)
D) Cases
41. Case concerning Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua, (1986), Judgement of International Court of Justice
42. Separate Opinion of Judge Sette-Camara, pp. 199, 200, Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America)
E) Websites
)