دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران
نوع مقاله : علمی-پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشیار حقوق جزا و جرمشناسی دانشگاه قم، قم، ایران
2 دانشجوی دکتری حقوق جزا و جرمشناسی دانشگاه قم، قم، ایران
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله English
نویسندگان English
Following the amendment of Article 157 of the [Iranian] Constitution in 1989 whereby it was provided that the Iranian judiciary will presided over by a single person – called the Head of the Judiciary- instead of the Supreme Judicial Council, one important challenge was the judicial competence of the head of the judiciary which had proponents and opponents at the time. However, after the amendment of Article 157, the Consultative Assembly (the Iranian parliament) adopted laws that recognized the judicial competence of the head of the judiciary. This approach led to the adoption of Article 477 of the Criminal Procedure Code. By studying the negotiations of the Constitutional Revision Council, this paper aims to find the intention of the constitutional legislator about the existence or lack thereof the judicial competence of the head of the judiciary. It will also evaluate Article 477 of the Criminal Procedure Code as the latest law which approves the judicial competence of the head of the judiciary. We conclude that the Consultative Assembly conferring judicial competence to the head of the judiciary is contrary to the text and spirit of the Constitution and has no functional rationale.
کلیدواژهها English
الف) کتابها
ب) مقالات
ج) سایت
nazarat.shora-rc.ir/Forms/frmMosavabat.aspx
الف) کتابها
