1. فارسی

الف) مقالات

1. ایزدی، علی (1394)، «نگاه تطبیقی به اجرای حقوق بین‌الملل در محاکم ملی»، فصلنامة مطالعات حقوق عمومی، دورة 45، ش 3، ص 529-497.
2. سهرابلو، علی؛ طجرلو، رضا (1398)، اثرپذیری حقوق داخلی از قواعد و هنجارهای حقوق بین‌الملل، مطالعات حقوق عمومی، دورة 49، ش 2، ص 499-470.
3. کدخدایی، عباسعلی؛ مقامی، امیر (1397)، «پیامدهای خوانش دستورگرایانه از حقوق بین‌المللی»، مجلة حقوقی بین‌المللی، دورة 35، ش 59، ص 38-7.
4. والتر، سوزان (1384)، «احیا و بازسازی تاریخ اعلامی، حقوق جهانی حقوق بشر»، ترجمة عباس خلجی، مجلة دانشکدة علوم انسانی (دانشگاه امام حسین)، سال چهاردهم، ش 61، ص 192-161.

ب) آرا

5. رأی شمارة 02264/99 مورخ ۱۱/۱۰/۹۹ شعبة 13 دادگاه تجدیدنظر استان مازندران
6. رأی شمارة 00839/98 مورخ 17/5/98 شعبة 19 دادگاه تجدیدنظر استان مازندران
7. رأی شمارة 01283/97 مورخ 7/12/97 شعبة 13 دادگاه تجدیدنظر استان کرمانشاه

8 . رأی شمارة 00317/98 مورخ 4/4/98 شعبة 13 دادگاه تجدیدنظر استان کرمانشاه

9 . رأی شمارة 1055/97 مورخ 15/10/98 شعبة 13 دادگاه تجدیدنظر استان کرمانشاه

10. رأی شمارة 00011/99شعبة اول دادگاه عمومی حقوقی شهرستان دشتی (خورموج)

2. انگلیسی
3. A) Books
4. Sloss, David & Van Alstine Michael (2015), International Law in Domestic Courts, Santa Clara Digital Commons, doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511635458, Available at: http://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/facpubs/889,
5. Sloss, David (2009), "the role of Domestic court in treaty Enforcement, a comparative study, Santa Clara University School of Law, New York, Cambridge University press

B (Articles

3. Altwicker, Tilmann (2018), "Transnationalizing Rights: International Human Rights Law in Cross-Border Contexts", the European Journal of International Law, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 581–606 DOI:10.22059/jplsq.2018.240446.1573.
4. Amos, Merris (2017), "The Value of the European Court of Human Rights to the United Kingdom", The European Journal of International Law, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 763–785.
5. 5. Focarelli, Carlo (2005), "Denying Foreign State Immunity for Commission of International Crimes: The Ferrini Decision", International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 54, pp.951-958.
6. Glanvill, Luke (2017)." The Responsibility to Protect beyond Borders in the Law of Nature and Nations", The European Journal of International Law,Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 1069– 1095.
7. Hasanat, Abul, (2013)."Using International Law in National Courts: Bangladesh Perspective"13 (1 &2) Bangladesh Journal of Law", Vol. 13, pp. 49-73.
8. Hathaway, Oona A. (2002)." Do Human Rights Treaties Make a Difference?", The Yale Law Journal, Vol. 111, pp.1935-2042.
9. Krep, Sarah Elizabeth & Arena, Anthony clark (2006),"Why states follow the rules: toward a positional theory of adherence to international legal regimes", duke journal of comparative &international law, Vol. 16, pp.331-414.
10. Kunz, Raffaela (2020), "Judging International Judgments Anew? The Human Rights Courts before Domestic Courts", the European Journal of International Law, Vol. 30, pp.1129- 1163.
11. Laith K. Nasrawin (2016), "an International Constitutional Court: Future Roles & Challenges" Digest of Middle East Studies,Vol. 25, pp.210–226 DOI: 10.1111/dome.12090.
12. Niels, Petersen (2017), " The International Court of Justice and the Judicial Politics of Identifying Customary International Law", the European Journal of International Law, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 357–385.
13. Outi, Korhone (2017), " Within and Beyond Interdisciplinarity in International Law and Human Rights", The European Journal of International Law, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 625–648.
14. Roberto, Arthur & Giannattasio, Capella (2018), "the Interaction between International and Domestic Legal Orders: Framing the Debate according to the Post-Modern Condition of International Law "German law journal, Vol.19, No.01 pp.1-20.
15. Sandlotz, Wayne (2015), "How domestic courts use international law?", Fordham international law journal, Vol, 38, issue 2 article 5, pp. 595-636.
16. Shelton, Dinah (2003(, "Boundaries of Human Rights Jurisdiction in Europe", duke journal of comparative &international law, Vol. 13, pp. 95-142.
17. Sloss, David (2011), “Domestic Application of Treaties”, Santa Clara Law Digital Commons, pp. 1-27 Available at: http://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/facpubs/63526.
18. Woolaver, Hannah (2019), "From Joining to Leaving: Domestic Law’s Role in the International Legal Validity of Treaty Withdrawal" The European Journal of International Law, Vol. 30, No. 1, 73–104

C (cases

19. A.I.R, 1997, Vishaka v. The State of RajasthanS.C. 3011 para.13 (India)
20. Court of Appeal Florence, 2002, Ferrini v. Germany, Arezzo Tribunal No. 1403198
21. Court of Cassation decision, 2004, no: 5044/4, ILDC 19, 128 ILR. 658.
22. ECHR, 1996, loizidou v. Turkey, judgment (merits), para, 43 and 52
23. House of lords, 1999, opinions of the lords of appeal for judgment in the cause Regina v. Bartle and the commissioner of police for the metropolis and others (appellants) ex parte found on the following web site: http://www.publications.parliament.uk. HRNZ, 1994, Simpson v. Attorney General, at 42-43
24. ICJ Reports, 2004, Advisory opinion about legal consequences of the construction of a wall in the occupied Palestinian territory, para 1570
25. P.C.I.J. Reports, 1935, the Greco-Bulgarian Communities Case Series B No.10 (
26. P.C.I.J. Reports, 1932, Free Zones Case series A/B No. 46
27. P.C.I.J, 1931, The Polish Nationals in Danzing case, series A/B, No. 44.
28. S.C.R, 1989, Slaight Communications Inc. v. Davidson, 1. 1038 (Can.)
29. Verwaltungsgerichtsh of Baden Württemberg, 1996, Judgment, 10 S 1765/96, in particular, pp. 11-16

1. D) Other Documents
2. Human Rights in the Administration of Justice: A Manual on Human Rights for Judges, Prosecutors and Lawyers Chapter1 international human rights law and the role of the