دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران
نوع مقاله : علمی-پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 استاد، گروه حقوق عمومی، دانشکدۀ حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
2 دانشجوی دکتری حقوق عمومی دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
3 دانشآموختۀ کارشناسی ارشد حقوق عمومی دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله English
نویسندگان English
Article 153 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran, recognizing the bitter experience of the past, resulting from the conclusion of hegemonic treaties, has prohibited any contract that causes foreign domination of natural resources, economy, culture, etc. This Article seems to need to redefine the instances of contracts subject to domination because it can lead to misunderstandings. However, this paper seeks to redefine the instances of article 153 while defining "domination" and the scope of the concept of "alien", as well as answer the ambiguities in this field using an analytical-descriptive method, with library resources and opinions of the Guardian Council. This paper is based on the premise that the objectification of article 153 requires the relevant laws and its explanation and completion by the parliament, and the emptiness of ordinary law in defining the instances of article 153 makes the mentioned principle one of the suspended and silent articles. Therefore, the main finding of the present article is that the instances of the mentioned principle, including "other affairs of the country", can lead to misunderstandings and interpretations that can have profound effects on national interests.
کلیدواژهها English
الف) کتابها
6.جعفری لنگرودی، محمدجعفر (1372)، ترمینولوژی حقوق، چ ششم، تهران: گنج دانش.
7.دهخدا، علیاکبر (1385)، فرهنگ متوسط دهخدا، چ اول، تهران: مؤسسۀ انتشارات و چاپ دانشگاه تهران.
ب) مقالات
