نوع مقاله : علمی-پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 استاد حقوق بین الملل، عضو هیأت علمی دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران
2 دکتری حقوق بینالملل، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
3 دانشجوی دکتری حقوق بینالملل، واحد تهران شمال، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله English
نویسندگان English
In international arbitration, arbitrators may encounter allegations of corruption from one of the parties or find evidence during document review that raises a strong suspicion of corrupt practices. Typically, arbitrators prefer to resolve disputes within the framework of the parties’ claims and pleadings, avoiding such issues. However, passivity in the face of corruption not only invites abuse of the arbitration process but can also turn it into a tool for legitimizing illegal contracts and agreements. This study examines whether arbitrators should adopt a proactive approach in confronting corruption or continue proceedings neutrally, in accordance with the parties’ agreements. Some arbitrators, while recognizing their jurisdiction, actively address corruption by applying established anti-corruption standards. By analyzing selected awards in international arbitration, this study demonstrates the value and desirability of a proactive approach in dealing with corruption.
کلیدواژهها English
- مقالات