دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران

نوع مقاله : علمی-پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استاد، گروه حقوق عمومی ، دانشکدۀ حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

2 پژوهشگر دورۀ دکتری، گروه حقوق عمومی، دانشکدۀ حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

10.22059/jplsq.2023.351392.3222

چکیده

از سال 1980 تا پایان سال 2022 وضع تحریم‌ بخش چشمگیری از سیاست ایالات ‌متحدة آمریکا در قبال جمهوری اسلامی ایران بوده است. در اواخر دهۀ 1990 رویکرد آمریکا از وضع تحریم‌های کلی به وضع تحریم‌های هدفمند تغییر کرد و تحریم‌ها را به‌طور مشخص علیه اشخاص شامل نهاد‌ها، افراد، کشتی‌ها و هواپیما‌ها وضع کرد. تعداد زیادی از این اشخاص ایرانی و غیرایرانی از چگونگی استیفای حقوق تضییع‌شدة خود یا خروج نام خود از فهرست تحریم‌ها اطلاعی ندارند. در این پژوهش به این پرسش پاسخ داده شده است. برای یافتن پاسخ این پرسش حقوقی، ابتدا شالودۀ حقوقی نظام تحریم‌های یکجانبة آمریکا به‌طور کلی، سپس به‌طور خاص نظام تحریم‌ها علیه اشخاص مرتبط با جمهوری اسلامی ایران و متعاقباً جامعۀ آماری مربوط  به اشخاص تحریم‌شده بررسی شده است. در پایان پس از بررسی الزامات و ساختار اداری و قضایی داخلی آمریکا، مشخص می‌شود که در صورت احراز شرایط مشخص اشخاص مذکور، برای دادخواهی موفق یا خروج نامشان از فهرست تحریم‌های آمریکا می‌توانند از ظرفیت‌های اداری و قضایی داخلی آمریکا استفاده کنند، اما با وجود نمونه‌های موفق در این زمینه عمدة تلاش‌ها به‌علت پایبندی نهادهای اداری و قضایی از سیاست خارجی آمریکا موفقیت‌آمیز نیستند. 

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Pleading by the Islamic Republic of Iran's affiliated sanctioned persons against the sanctions at The United States of America's Legal Regime

نویسندگان [English]

  • Abasali Kadkhodaee 1
  • Saeid Baghban Kondori 2

1 Professor of Public Law, Department of Public law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

2 Phd. Researcher, Department of Public law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

چکیده [English]

From 1980  to the end of 2022 the imposition of sanctions has been a significant part of the policy of the U.S. towards the I.R. of Iran. In the late 1990s the U.S. approach changed from imposing comprehensive sanctions to targeted sanctions; US imposed sanctions specifically against persons including entities, individuals, vessels, and aircrafts. A significant number of these Iranian and non-Iranian persons do not know how to be delisted from U.S.’ sanctions list or legally challenge the sanctions. In order to  answer to this legal question, the legal basis of the U.S. unilateral sanctions regime, the regime of sanctions against persons affiliated to the I.R. of Iran and, statistics of sanctioned persons is reviewed. In the end, after examining the administrative and judicial requirements and structure of the U.S. legal system, the researcher comes to the conclusion that the aforementioned persons, if certain conditions are met, may resort to the U.S. domestic administrative and judicial capacities to successfully challenge the sanctions. However, despite the existence of successful examples in this field, most of the efforts are not successful due to the compliance by administrative and judicial institutions with the U.S. foreign policy.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • United States of America
  • Iran
  • sanctions
  • Pleading
  • administrative
  • judicial
  1. فارسی

- پایان‌نامه

  1. جلیلی، محمدعلی (1398). کارامدی تحریم‌های آمریکا و راهکارهای حقوقی مقابله با آن. پایان‌نامۀ کارشناسی ارشد.

 

  1. انگلیسی
  2. A) Books
  3. Anglim, C. (2022). International Sanctions: A Legal Research Guide. William S. Hein & Co.
  4. Barnes, R. (2016). United States Sanctions: Delisting Applications, Judicial Review and Secret Evidence. M Happold and P Eden (Eds). Economic Sanctions and International Law.Hart Publishing.
  5. Gordon, R.(2019). Sanctions Law. Bloomsbury Publishing.

 

  1. B) Legislations

- Codes of Federal Regulations

  1. CFR § 17.17 - Judicial proceedings. Available at: https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/28/17.1728 U.S. Code § 1331. [accessed 1 January 2023]
  2. CFR § 501.806 - Procedures for unblocking funds believed to have been blocked due to mistaken identity. Available at: .https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/31/501.80631 CFR § 501.807. [accessed 1 January 2023]
  3. CFR § 510.326 - United States person; U.S. person. Available at: https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/31/510.32631 CFR § 542.319. [accessed 1 January 2023]
  4. CFR § 595.315 - United States person; U.S. person. Available at: https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/31/595.315. [accessed 1 January 2023]

 

- United States Codes

  1. U.S. Code § 2401 - Time for commencing action against United States. Available at: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/24015 U.S. Code § 702. [accessed 1 January 2023]
  2. U.S. Code § 704 - Actions reviewable. Available at: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/5/7045 US Code § 706. [accessed 1 January 2023]
  3. U.S. Code § 1701 - Unusual and extraordinary threat; declaration of national emergency; exercise of Presidential authorities. Available at: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/1701. [accessed 1 January 2023]
  4. U.S. Code § 1702 - Presidential authorities. Available at: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/1702. [accessed 1 January 2023]
  5. U.S. Code § 1189 - Designation of foreign terrorist organizations. Available at: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1189. [accessed 1 January 2023]

 

- Judicial Practices

  1. Al Haramain v. Treasury Department 686 F 3d 965 9th Cir (2012). Available at: https://casetext.com/case/al-haramain-islamic-found-inc-v-us-dept-of-the-treasury. [accessed 1 January 2023]
  2. Bennett v. Spear (95-813), 520 U.S. 154 (1997). Available at: https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/95-813.ZO.html. [accessed 1 January 2023]
  3. Mathews v. Eldridge 424 U.S. 319, 334–35 (1976). Available at: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/424/319/. [accessed 1 January 2023]
  4. National Council of Resistance of Iran v. Department of State 251 F 3d 192 (2001). Available at: https://casetext.com/case/national-council-of-resistance-v-dept-of-st. [accessed 1 January 2023]
  5. People’s Mohajedin Organization of Iran v. Department of State 182 F 3d 17 (1999). Available at: https://www.refworld.org/cases,USA_CA_DC,4152e0ff0.html. [accessed 1 January 2023]
  6. People’s Mohajedin Organization of Iran v. Department of State 613 F 3d 220 (2010). Available at: https://casetext.com/case/in-re-peoples-mojahedin-org-of-iran. [accessed 1 January 2023]
  7. Reiter v. Cooper, 507 U.S. 258 (1993). Available at: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/507/258/. [accessed 1 January 2023]
  8. United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez, 494 U.S. 259 (1990). Available at: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/494/259/. [accessed 1 January 2023]
  9. Zevallos v. Obama 10 F Supp 3d 111 (2014). Available at: https://casetext.com/case/zevallos-v-obama-4. [accessed 1 January 2023]
  10. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe 401 U.S. 402, 416 (1971). Available at: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/401/402/. [accessed 1 January 2023]
  11. Havlish v. 650 Fifth Ave. Co., Docket Nos. 17-3278(L). August 09, 2019. United States Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit). Available at: https://case-law.vlex.com/vid/havlish-v-650-fifth-889164209. [accessed 1 January 2023]
  12. Holy Land Foundation v Ashcrof 333 F 3d 156 (2003). Available at: https://casetext.com/case/holy-land-foundation-v-ashcroft
  13. Kadi v Geithner 42 F Supp 3d (2012). Available at: https://casetext.com/case/kadi-v-geithner-1. [accessed 1 January 2023]
  14. Kindhearts for Charitable Humanitarian Dev., Inc. v Geithner 647 F Supp 2d 857 (2009). Available at: https://casetext.com/case/kindhearts-for-charitable-human-devel-v-geithner. [accessed 1 January 2023]
  15. Islamic American Relief Agency (IARA–USA) v Gonzales 477 F 3d 728 (2007). Available at: https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-dc-circuit/1083378.html. [accessed 1 January 2023]

 

 

- UN Documents

  1. A/HRC/51/33/Add.4. “Human Rights Council Fifty-first session 12 September–7 October 2022 Agenda item 3 Promotion and protection of all human rights, civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights, including the right to development”. 13 September 2022. Available at: https://daccess-ods.un.org/tmp/6211303.47251892.html.