نوع مقاله : علمی-پژوهشی
نویسنده
دانشآموختۀ دکتری حقوق بینالملل، دانشکدۀ حقوق، پردیس فارابی دانشگاه تهران، قم، ایران؛ عضو مرکز وکلا، کارشناسان و مشاوران خانواده قوه قضائیه.
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله English
نویسنده English
Provisional measures constitute an integral part of international proceedings including those conducted by judicial and quasi-judicial bodies dealing with human rights complaints. As international legal proceedings have proved to be time-consuming, one could expect the rights asserted by one of the parties to the dispute would incur irreparable prejudice while the final judgment is pending. This would justify issuance of provisional measures. International judicial and quasi-judicial bodies have made provisional measures contingent upon satisfactions of certain requirements. The most important of these requirements are the risk of irreparable prejudice and urgency of the measures requested, because they provide the basis for legitimacy of provisional measures. In the present article, the concepts of the risk of irreparable prejudice and temporal urgency of the risk are analyzed through the jurisprudence of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. The study reveals that the said requirements are ascertained by these two human rights bodies through a careful consideration of the facts and circumstances of a given case and the interpretation of the claimed rights in line with the protection of the beneficiaries’ rights with emphasis on clear and convincing evidence in terms of plausibility of the alleged harm.
کلیدواژهها English
الف) مقالات
ب) رساله
Doucments