دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران
نوع مقاله : علمی-پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری حقوق عمومی، واحد تهران شمال، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
2 استاد، گروه حقوق عمومی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران
3 دانشیار گروه فلسفه، واحد تهران شمال، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
4 استاد گروه حقوق، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
5 استادیار گروه حقوق، واحد تهران شمال، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله English
نویسندگان English
The confrontation between the two theories of direct and indirect democracy is one of the contentious topics surrounding democratic implementation models. In direct democracy, citizens exclusively have the right to enact laws. In contrast, the idea of indirect democracy claims that due to citizens' ignorance and the high costs associated with directly consulting them in any matter, representatives can better fulfill this responsibility. The arguments for the latter have gained more traction due to a closer connection to reality (at least until now); however, with the extensive changes brought about by technological advancements known as the Fourth Industrial Revolution, the possibility of altering these assumptions seems plausible. In this context, the present paper, seeks to answer the question: how the achievements of the Fourth Industrial Revolution can help address the gaps in the idea of direct democracy? This research suggests that if the predictions are realized, access for the general public will become much easier and less costly, and even with the help of new technologies, citizens' preferences can be extracted without direct consultation. Additionally, with the assistance of artificial intelligence, it is expected that the general public will have an even greater ability to participate in drafting programs or selecting proposals that align with their desired interests; developments that effectively negate the advantages of the indirect democracy concept.
کلیدواژهها English
الف) کتابها
ب) مقالات
