نوع مقاله : علمی-پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 استادیار حقوق بینالملل عمومی، گروه حقوق، دانشکدۀ علوم انسانی، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان. ایران.
2 دانشآموختۀ دکتری حقوق بینالملل، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله English
نویسندگان English
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has jurisdiction over all matters involving two parties bringing their case to the Court, as well as over specific cases anticipated by the United Nations Charter or current treaties and agreements. Essentially, advisory opinions are not binding on the international organs and institutions that request them on behalf of their respective governments. Nonetheless, the statutes of international organizations or conventions may stipulate that advisory opinions shall be binding. Section 2 of Article 94 of the UN Charter specifies judgments. Advisory opinions possess a binding character similar to treaties, statutes, and charter interpretations, achieved through adversarial proceedings, the role of requesting organs, or customary rules. However, rather than being two separate and independent entities, judgments and advisory opinions share many commonalities as well as differences. The present research draws on library and online materials, as well as documents from the International Court of Justice, to scrutinize the interactive function of judgments and advisory opinions of the ICJ and their role in the evolution of international law.
کلیدواژهها English
الف) کتابها
ب) مقالات
DOI: 10.22066/CILAMAG.2004.18001
bayanbox.ir/id/2284399125669879036?download
ج) پایاننامهها
12.عیسائی، شمسالله (1375). حدود تأثیر یا دامنۀ شمول نظریات مشورتی دیوان بینالمللی دادگستری. پایاننامة کارشناسی ارشد. به راهنمایی محمدرضا ضیائی بیگدلی. تهران: دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، دانشکدة حقوق و علوم سیاسی، تاریخ دفاع 1375.