دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران
نوع مقاله : علمی-پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری حقوق جزا و جرم شناسی، دانشکدۀ حقوق، دانشکدگان فارابی، قم، ایران
2 دانشجوی دکتری حقوق عمومی، دانشکدۀ حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
3 عضو هیأت علمی پژوهشکدۀ شورای نگهبان و دکتری حقوق عمومی دانشگاه تهران، دانشکدۀ حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله English
نویسندگان English
According to article 34 of the [Iranian] Constitution, everyone has the right to bring their claims before a court of law, and based on this right, the judiciary is tasked with examining and judging claims under article 156 of the constitution. To achieve a fair trial, the role of the Guardian Council as the interpreter of the Constitution is of great importance. In fact, the fair trial concept in the constitution is an ideal that requires the determination of standards that the constitutional judge expresses during the examination of legislative approvals. Accordingly, this research seeks to answer the question: what are the requirements for achieving an optimal fair trial according to the opinions of the Guardian Council? This study, using library data and an analytical-descriptive method, aims to identify the requirements of an optimal trial in three stages of judicial proceedings: 'before the judgment is issued,' 'issuing the judgment,' and 'executing the judgment.' The research concludes that the Guardian Council has implicitly and explicitly determined the guarantees and requirements for a fair trial and has deemed the legislative approvals of the Majlis incompatible with these standards in several instances.
کلیدواژهها English
الف) کتابها
ب) مقالات
