1. فارسی

الف) کتاب‏ها

1. زرنشان، شهرام (1392). شکل‏گیری و شناسایی حقوق بین‏الملل عرفی. تهران: گنج دانش.
2. شیروی، عبدالحسین (1392). حقوق تطبیقی. تهران: سمت.

ب) مقالات

3. بایرز، مایکل (1997). دعوای پینوشه: معجونی از حقوق و سیاست. ترجمۀ محمدجواد میرفخرایی(1379). مجلۀ حقوقی، 18(25)، 85-125.
4. برادلی و اِوینگ (2006). منابع ماهیت قانون اساسی انگلستان. ترجمۀ توکّل حبیبزاده (1385 و 1386). مجلۀ حقوق اساسی، 4(6 و 7)، 321-356.
5. جهانگیری، نبی‏الله (1397). مصونیت دیپلماتیک از منظر فقه. نشریۀ معارف قرآن و عترت، 4(8)، 199-223.
6. رضازاده، حسین و امین‏زاده، الهام (1398). مصونیت مستشاران نظامی ایران در عراق و سوریه. فصلنامۀ مطالعات حقوق عمومی، 49(3)، 675-693.
7. ضیایی بیگدلی، محمدرضا (1378). پیوندهای بنیادین عرف و معاهده در حقوق بین‏الملل. پژوهش حقوق عمومی، 1(1)، 9-22.
8. کدخدایی، عباسعلی و عابدینی، عبدالله (1394). مصونیت دولت و قاعدۀ آمره: استثنای در حال ظهور؟. فصلنامه مطالعات حقوق عمومی، 45(1)، 35-62.
9. سیداشرفی، میرمصطفی؛ محبی، محسن؛ هنجنی، سیدعلی و نیاورانی، صابر (1399). مصونیت کیفری مقامات رسمی نزد محاکم خارجی در طرح کمیسیون حقوق بین‏الملل. فصلنامۀ دیدگاه‏های حقوق قضایی، 25(89)، 251-273.

• منصوری، فرنگیس (1395). بررسی لغو مصونیت کیفری سران دولت‏ها به عنوان یک قاعده حقوق بین‏الملل عرفی. فصلنامه سیاست خارجی، 30(3)، 77-104.
• موسی‏زاده، رضا و رضایی استخرویه، محمد (1394). تحول مفهوم مصونیت دیپلماتیک: ملاحظات امنیتی و حقوق بشری. نشریۀ امنیت‏پژوهی، 14(51)، 189-216.
• نواری، علی (1390). مصونیت قضایی دولت و نقض حقوق بشر در پرتو عملکرد دولت‏ها، رویۀ قضایی و دکترین. فصلنامۀ سیاست خارجی، 25(4)، 1053-1085.

1. انگلیسی
2. A) Book
3. Bankas, E. (2005). The State Immunity Controversy in International Law. Heidelberg: Springer.
4. Crawford, J. (2014). Chance, Order, Change: The Course of International Law, General Course on Public International Law. Leiden: Brill–Nijhoff.
5. Fatima, Sh. (2005). Using International Law in Domestic Courts. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
6. Gragl, P. (2018). Legal Monism: Law, Philosophy, and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. Haljan, D. (2013). Separating Powers: International Law Before National Courts. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press.
8. Lepard, B. (2010). Customary International Law: A New Theory with Practical Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Schabas, W. (2021). The Customary International Law of Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. Shaw, M. (2017). International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Shelton, D. (2011). International Law and Domestic Legal Systems: Incorporation, Transformation, and Persuasion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12. Sloss, D. (2009). The Role of Domestic Courts in Treaty Enforcement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Weill, Sh. (2014). The Role of National Courts in Applying International Humanitarian Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. Youngs, R. (2014). English, French and German Comparative Law. London: Routledge.

1. B) Article
2. Baker, R. (2010). Customary International Law in the 21st Century: Old Challenges and New Debates. The European Journal of International Law. 21(1), 173-204.
3. Benvenisti, E. (1993). Judicial Misgivings Regarding the Application of International Law: An Analysis of Attitudes of National Courts. European Journal of International Law. 4(2), 159-183.
4. Brierley, J. (1935). International Law in England. Law Quarterly Journal. 51, 24-35.
5. Capps, P. (2007). The Court as Gatekeeper: Customary International Law in English Courts. The Modern Law Review. 70(3), 458-483.
6. Dugard, J. (1982). The Application of Customary International Law Affecting Human Rights by National Tribunals, American Society of International Law. 76, 245-251. (https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272503700030755)
7. Fairweather, C. (1998). Obstacles to Enforcing International Human Rights Law in Domestic Courts. C. Davis Journal of International Law & Policy. 4(2), 119-146.
8. Francioni, F. (2001). International Law as a Common Language for National Courts. Texas International Law Journal. 36(3), 587-598.
9. Khalastchi, R. (1999). International Environmental Law in the Courts of the United Kingdom, Review of European, Comparative and International Environmental Law. 8(3), 301-308. (https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9388.00214)
10. Kirby, M. (2010). The Common Law and International Law: A Dynamic Contemporary Dialogue. Legal Studies. 30(1), 30-60. (https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-121X.2009.00138.x)
11. Okowa, Ph. (2010). Interpreting Constitutive Instruments of International Criminal Tribunals: Reflections on the Special Court for Sierra Leone. In Treaty Interpretation and the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: 30 Years on, Edited by Fitzmaurice M. & Okowa, Ph.. Leiden: Brill–Nijhoff. 333-356.
12. Roberts, A. (2011). Comparative International Law? The Role of National Courts in Creating and Enforcing International Law. International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 60(1), 57-92. (https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589310000679)
13. Ryngaert, C. & Siccama D. (2018). Ascertaining Customary International Law: An Inquiry into the Methods Used by Domestic Courts. Netherland International Law Review. 65(1), 1-25. (DOI:10.1007/s40802-018-0104-y)
14. Singh, R. (2005). The Use of International Law in The Domestic Courts of The United Kingdom. Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly. 56(2), 119-134.
15. Thomas, K. R. (2006). The Changing Status of International Law in English Domestic Law. Netherlands International Law Review. 53(3), 371-398. (DOI:10.1017/S0165070X06003718)
16. Trapp, K. (2014). The Interaction of the International Terrorism Suppression Regime and IHL in Domestic Criminal Prosecutions: The UK Experience. In Applying International Humanitarian Law in Judicial and Quasi- Judicial Bodies International and Domestic Aspects. Edited by Jinks, D., Maogoto, J., & Solomon, S.. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press., 165-181.
17. Tzanakopoulos, A. (2011). Domestic Courts in International Law: The International Judicial Function of National Courts. Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review. 34(1), 133-168.
18. Tzanakopoulos, A. (2016). The Influence of English Courts on the Development of International Law. In British Influences on International Law: 1915-2015. Edited by McCorquodale, R. & Gauci, J.. Leiden: Brill–Nijhoff. 9-27.
19. Tzanakopoulos, A. & Tams, Ch. (2013). Domestic Courts as Agents of Development of International Law. Leiden Journal of International Law. 26(3), 531-540. (https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156513000228)
20. Wuerth, I. (2012). International Law in Domestic Courts and The Jurisdictional Immunities of The State Case. Melbourne Journal of International Law. 13, 819-837.

1. C) Dissertation
2. Amit, Roni (2004). Judges without Border: International Human Rights in Domestic Courts. Washington: University of Washington.

1. D) Cases
2. Al-Adsani v United Kingdom (2002) 34 EHRR 11. (United Kingdom)
3. Al-Juffali v Estrada [2016] EWCA Civ 176. (United Kingdom)
4. Benkharbouche v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2017] UKSC 62. (United Kingdom)
5. Jones v Saudi Arabia [2006] UKHL 26. (United Kingdom)
6. HRH Prince Abdul Aziz Bin Fahd Bin Abdul Aziz v Harb [2015] EWCA Civ 481. (United Kingdom)
7. Keyu & Ors v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs & Anor [2015] UKSC 69. (United Kingdom)
8. KL v R. [2014] EWCA Crim 1729. (United Kingdom)
9. Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. Italy: Greece intervening), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 2012. (International Court of Justice)
10. R (Abbasi) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2003] UKHRR 76. (United Kingdom)
11. R (Faisal Attiyah Nassar Al-Saadoon, Khalaf Hussain Mufdhi) v The Secretary of State for Defence [2009] EWCA Civ 7. (United Kingdom)
12. R v. Mohammed Gul [2012] EWCA Crim 280. (United Kingdom)
13. R (European Roma Rights Centre) v Immigration Officer at Prague Airport [2004] UKHL 55 [2005] 2 WLR 1. (United Kingdom)
14. (on the application of the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament) v. Prime Minister and others [2002] EWHC 2777 (Admin., [2002] All ER (D) 245. (United Kingdom)
15. Reyes v Al-Malki & Anor [2017] UKSC 61. (United Kingdom)
16. Sultan of Pahang, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 616. (United Kingdom)
17. The Freedom and Justice Party & Ors, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs & Anor [2016] EWHC 2010 (Admin). (United Kingdom)
18. The Freedom and Justice Party & Ors, R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs & Anor (Rev 2) [2018] EWCA Civ 1719. (United Kingdom)