دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران
نوع مقاله : علمی-پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی مقطع دکتری تخصصی حقوق بینالملل عمومی، گروه حقوق عمومی و بینالملل، دانشکدۀ حقوق، الهیات و علوم سیاسی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
2 عضو هیأت علمی بازنشستۀ دانشگاه علوم قضایی و مدعو گروه حقوق عمومی و بینالملل، دانشکدة حقوق و علوم سیاسی، واحد علوم تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
3 استادیار گروه تخصصصی حقوق عمومی و بینالملل، دانشکدۀ حقوق، الهیات و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله English
نویسندگان English
In times of civil conflict, UN peacekeeping operations play a vital role in safeguarding human rights norms and ensuring security in the affected countries. Ensuring security and upholding norms in these operations leads to a dual approach: one that emphasizes human rights principles and another that focuses on guaranteeing and restoring lasting peace and stability in the host country. This dual approach ultimately places the legitimacy of the operation in conflict between "procedural legitimacy"—based on norms and principles—and "output legitimacy"—based on the effectiveness of the actions taken. This results in a dual identity for UN actions, influencing how the international community judge the legitimacy of these actions. It can also lead to distrust in the efficiency of the UN. The peacekeeping operations in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Liberia, and East Timor serve as clear examples of these functional disorders, which have even been interpreted as "organizational hypocrisy" in some international legal commentary. This article, using an inductive analytical method, examines the challenges in analyzing the criteria of legitimacy for the actions of UN peacekeepers and emphasizes the need for a comprehensive view of this issue.
کلیدواژهها English
الف) کتابها
ب) مقالات
- پایاننامه
