دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران
نوع مقاله : علمی-پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 استادیار گروه حقوق عمومی، دانشکدۀ حقوق دانشگاه علوم قضایی و خدمات اداری، تهران، ایران
2 دانشجوی دکتری حقوق عمومی، گروه حقوق عمومی و بینالملل، دانشکدۀ حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله English
نویسندگان English
This article seeks to evaluate the relationship between inconsistencies in the legislation with Shari'a and inconsistencies in the legislation with the Constitution in the opinions of the Constitutional Council. For this Purpose, this Study reviews some of the opinions of this Council. The legal system of the Islamic Republic of Iran is organized on the basis of Shari'a, and on this basis, it is necessary that laws and regulations conform to Shari'a standards or at a minimum not contradict them. This task has been assigned to the Constitutional Council. Based on the two mentioned duties, this institution can be considered to be a combination of two bodies: the Shari'a Review Body and the Constitutional Review Body. On the other hand, although the Shari'a has supremacy over the legislative process, it does not necessarily mean that inconsistencies in the legislation with the Costitutional automatically translate into inconsistencies in the legislation with Shari'a and as a result, the discussion of the relationship between Shari’a, and the law remains one of the fundamental issues of the legal system of the Islamic Republic of Iran. The question which now presents itself is that what is the relationship between inconsistencies in the legislation with Shari'a and inconsistencies in the legislation with the Constitution in thr practice of the Guardian council? The present research aims to clarify the Constitutional Council’s point of view in the regard by examining several comments from the council.
کلیدواژهها English
