دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران
نوع مقاله : علمی-پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشیار گروه حقوق بین الملل دانشکده حقوق دانشگاه شهید بهشتی تهران، ایران
2 دانشجوی دکتری حقوق تجارت و سرمایه گذاری بین المللی، دانشکدة حقوق، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی تهران ، ایران
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله English
نویسندگان English
An examination of the position of national security exeptrion in the World Trade Organization and international case law is of great importance, especially as we have recently witnessed unprecedented references by states to the national security exeption as a means to avoid fulfilling their obligations. The continuation of this trend in the near future will undoubtedly present significant challenges to the international legal system. In this context, the most important questions include: the conditions for invoking the national security exception, its legal implications, and ultimately the mechanisms to address the challenges ahead. By analyzing the latest findings from international judicial practices, particularly the Russia Transit case in the World Trade Organization and the Certain Iranian Assets case in the International Court of Justice, it can be concluded that a state is exempt from fulfilling its obligations under the guise of national security only when the invocation of national security is "necessary," the actions taken are "proportional" to the goal of maintaining national security, and they have been taken in "good faith." The establishment of a balance between conflicting interests by the court and the acceptance of the invocation of national security within the limits of rationality are two mechanisms to counter the challenges posed by the national security exception.
کلیدواژهها English
الف) کتابها
ب) مقالات
