1. فارسی

الف) مقالات

1. قناد، فاطمه؛ شریف، الهام (1400). مطالعة اجمالی حمایت از داده‌های شخصی در نظام حقوقی ایران و سند مقررات عمومی حفاظت از داده‌های اتحادیة اروپا. حقوق فناوری‌های نوین، 2(4) ،1-22.
2. مرکز پژوهش‌های مجلس شورای اسلامی؛ دفتر مطالعات ارتباطات و فناوری‌های نوین (1397). بررسی قوانین حفاظت از داده‌های کاربران در کشورهای منتخب، شمارة مسلسل 15877.
3. لطیف‌زاده، مهدیه؛ قبولی درافشان، سیدمحمدمهدی؛ محسنی، سعید؛ عابدی، محمد (1402). حمایت از دادة شخصی در حقوق اتحادیة اروپا و امکان‌سنجی آن در نظام حقوقی ایران. فصلنامة مطالعات حقوق عمومی، 53(2)، 981-1005.
4. لطیف‌زاده، مهدیه؛ قبولی درافشان، سید محمدمهدی؛ محسنی، سعید؛ عابدی، محمد (1400)، تحلیل بستر قانونی حمایت از دادۀ شخصی در اتحادیة اروپا. پژوهشنامة پردازش و مدیریت اطلاعات،37(2)، 439-472.

2. انگلیسی
3. A) Articles
4. Chen, Y., Ahn, M.J., & Wang, Y. F. (2023). Artificial Intelligence andPublic Values: Value Impacts and Governance in the Public Sector.Sustainability,15(6),1-22.
5. Chandler, L (2020). A Legal Comparative Analysis of Automated Decision-Making and Reasonableness in Administrative Law. SSRN Electronic Journal, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3817043. 
6. Cluzel-Métayer, L. (2020).The Judicial Review of the Automated Administrative Act. European Review of Digital Administration & Law, 1(1-2), 101-103.
7. Cobbe, J (2019). Administrative Law and the Machines of Government: Judicial Review of Automated Public-Sector Decision-Making. Legal Studies, 39(4), 636-655.
8. Demetzou, K. (2021).At the intersection of AI and data protection law: Automated Decision-Making rules, a global perspective (CPDP LATAM PANEL).available at: https://fpf.org/blog/at-the-intersection-of-ai-and-data-protection-law-automated-decision-making-rules-a-global-perspective-cpdp-latam-panel/
9. Edwards, L., Williams, R., & Binns, R. (2021). Legal and regulatory frameworks governing the use of automated decision making and assisted decision making by public sector bodies. Workshop briefing paper, England :The Legal Education Foundation
10. Finck, M (2020). Automated Decision-Making and Administrative Law.in the Oxford Handbook of Comparative Administrative Law. edited by Peter Cane and others. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 656–676.
11. Fraenkel-Haeberle, C (2020).Fully Digitalized Administrative Procedures in the German Legal System. European Review of Digital Administration & Law, 1(1-2), 105-111.
12. Gamero-Casado,E (2023).Automated Decision-Making Systems in Spanish Administrative Law. CERIDAP's Review, 1-2023, 24-40
13. Heras Ballell,T. R. (2022). Guiding Principles for Automated Decision-Making in the EU, ELI Innovation Paper, Austria, European Law Institute.
14. Hou, x. (2021). the application of Artificial Intelligence in Public Administration. Published in: 2^nd international conference on Artificial Intelligence and Education, Institute of Electrical and electronics Engineers, Dali, China, 278-282.
15. Monarcha-Matlak, A. (2021). Automated decision-making in public administration.Procedia Computer Science, 192, 2077–2084.
16. Park,K. B., Kyoung Ko, H., Chae, S., & Min Son, K. (2023). Data protections & privacy.South Korea: Trends and Developments. available at: https://www.leeko.com/upload/news/research/184/20230412111745466.pdf
17. Malgieri, G. (2019). Automated decision-making in the EU Member States: The right to explanation and other suitable safeguards in the national legislations, Computer Law & Security Review, 35(5), 1 -26.
18. Pszczyński, M. (2020). Administrative Decisions in the Era of Artificial Intelligence. Adam Mickiewicz University Law Review, 11, 253-271.
19. Reichel, J. (2023). Regulating Automation of Swedish Public Administration. CERIDAP's Review, 1-2023, 75-94.
20. Schneider, J-P. Enderlein, F (2023). Automated Decision-Making Systems in German Administrative Law.CERIDAP's Review, 1-2023 95-115.
21. Suksi, M. (2021). Administrative due process when using automated decision‑making in public administration: some notes from a Finnish perspective. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 29, 87–110.
22. Vale, S., & Zanfir-Fortuna, G. (2022). Automated Decision Making Under the GDPR, Practical Cases from Courts and Data Protection Authorities.Available at : https://fpf.org/wp content/uploads/2022/05/FPF-ADM-Report-R2-singles.pdf.
23. Weitzenboeck, E.M.(2021). Simplification of Administrative Procedures through Fully Automated Decision-Making: The Case of Norway. Administrative Sciences, 11(4), 1-23.
24. Williams, R. (2022). Rethinking Administrative Law for Algorithmic Decision Making. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 42(2), 468–494.
25. Wolswinkel, J. (2022). Comparative study on administrative law and the use of artificial intelligence and other algorithmic systems in administrative decision-making in the member states of the council of Europe. Strasbourg :Council of Europe Publishing, 1-43.
26. B) Dissertations
27. Rohl, U.B.U (2022). Automated, Administrative Decision-making and Good Administration: Friends, Foes or Complete Strangers?, Denmark, Aalborg University Press

1. C) Electronic Refrences
2. Law Commission of Ontario (2022).Accountable AI. Toronto.available at: https://www.lco-cdo.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/LCO-Accountable_AI_Final_Report.pdf
3. Directive on Automated Decision-Making, available at: https://www.tbs-sct.canada.ca/pol/doc-eng.aspx?id=32592
4. European Commission(2017).Guidelines on Automated individual decision-making and Profiling for the purposes of Regulation 2016/679, Available at : https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/article29/items/612053
5. Hofmann,H C.H. (2021).An Introduction to Automated Decision Making (ADM) and Cyber-Delegation in the Scope of EU Public Law.University of Luxembourg Law Research Paper No. 2021-008, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3876059or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3876059